Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?

In a lexical-decision task (LDT), Hino and Lupker (1996) reported a polysemy effect (faster response times for polysemous words [e.g., BANK]), and attributed this effect to enhanced feedback from the semantic system to orthographic units, for polysemous words. Using the same task, Pexman, Lupker, and Jared (in review) reported a homophone effect (slower response times for homophonic words [e.g., MAID]) and attributed this effect to inconsistent feedback from the phonological system to orthographic units, for homophones. In the present paper we test two predictions derived from this feedback explanation: Polysemy and homophone effects should (a) co-occur in a standard LDT (with pseudoword foils) and (b) both be larger with pseudohomophones (e.g., BRANE) as foils in LDT. The results supported both predictions.

[1]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[2]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[3]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  When Two Meanings Are Better Than One: Modeling the Ambiguity Advantage Using a Recurrent Distributed Network , 1994 .

[4]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[5]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[6]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[7]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed , 1975 .

[8]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY EFFECTS IN WORD IDENTIFICATION , 1996 .

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia , 1991 .

[10]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[11]  M. Gernsbacher Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[14]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .

[15]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Discussion of Wike and Church's comments , 1976 .

[16]  J. Ziegler,et al.  The Feedback Consistency Effect in Lexical Decision and Naming , 1997 .

[17]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[18]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[19]  R. Peereman,et al.  Is perception a two-way street ?: The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition , 1998 .

[20]  M. L. Millis,et al.  The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[21]  M. Masson A distributed memory model of semantic priming. , 1995 .

[22]  C. T. James The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[23]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[24]  Derek Besner,et al.  When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. , 1994 .

[25]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[26]  U. Hess,et al.  Transformations for within-subject designs: a Monte Carlo investigation. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  J. Jastrzembski Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Herbert Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings , 1971 .

[29]  G. Stone,et al.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[31]  R. Kreuz,et al.  The subjective familiarity of English homophones , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[33]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. , 1998 .

[34]  Derek Besner,et al.  Phonological recoding and lexical access , 1978 .

[35]  B. Abbott,et al.  The Psychology of Word Meanings. , 1992 .