Accelerated folding in the weak hydrophobic environment of a chaperonin cavity: creation of an alternate fast folding pathway.

Recent experiments suggest that the folding of certain proteins can take place entirely within a chaperonin-like cavity. These substrate proteins experience folding rate enhancements without undergoing multiple rounds of ATP-induced binding and release from the chaperonin. Rather, they undergo only a single binding event, followed by sequestration into the chaperonin cage. The present work uses molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the folding of a highly frustrated protein within this chaperonin cavity. The chaperonin interior is modeled by a sphere with a lining of tunable degree of hydrophobicity. We demonstrate that a moderately hydrophobic environment, similar to the interior of the GroEL cavity upon complexion with ATP and GroES, is sufficient to accelerate the folding of a frustrated protein by more than an order of magnitude. Our simulations support a mechanism by which the moderately hydrophobic chaperonin environment provides an alternate pathway to the native state through a transiently bound intermediate state.

[1]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Alan M. Ferrenberg,et al.  Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. , 1989, Physical Review Letters.

[3]  A. Fersht,et al.  Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and secB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Helen R. Saibil,et al.  GroEL-GroES Cycling ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings , 1999, Cell.

[5]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex , 1996, Nature.

[6]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[7]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. , 1996, Folding & design.

[8]  S W Englander,et al.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.

[9]  M Karplus,et al.  The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Shea,et al.  Effects of confinement in chaperonin assisted protein folding: rate enhancement by decreasing the roughness of the folding energy landscape. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  K A Dill,et al.  A simple model of chaperonin‐mediated protein folding , 1996, Proteins.

[12]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[13]  Walid A Houry,et al.  In Vivo Observation of Polypeptide Flux through the Bacterial Chaperonin System , 1997, Cell.

[14]  A. Fersht,et al.  Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Shape of Confined Polymer Chains , 1997 .

[16]  S. Radford,et al.  GroEL accelerates the refolding of hen lysozyme without changing its folding mechanism , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[17]  Helen R Saibil,et al.  The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL , 1996, Cell.

[18]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Simulations of chaperone-assisted folding. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[19]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Viscosity Dependence of the Folding Rates of Proteins , 1997, cond-mat/9705309.

[20]  M. Gaestel,et al.  Small heat shock proteins are molecular chaperones. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  D Thirumalai,et al.  The nature of folded states of globular proteins , 1992, Biopolymers.

[22]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. Weissman,et al.  Characterization of the Active Intermediate of a GroEL–GroES-Mediated Protein Folding Reaction , 1996, Cell.

[24]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[25]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Intermediates can accelerate protein folding. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[27]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Simulations of β-hairpin folding confined to spherical pores using distributed computing , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Energetic frustration and the nature of the transition state ensemble in protein folding , 2000 .

[29]  F. Hartl,et al.  Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL‐mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[30]  R. Ellis.  Protein Folding: Importance of the Anfinsen Cage , 2003, Current Biology.

[31]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Dual Function of Protein Confinement in Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding , 2001, Cell.

[32]  A. Minton.  Confinement as a determinant of macromolecular structure and reactivity. II. Effects of weakly attractive interactions between confined macrosolutes and confining structures. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Shoji Takada,et al.  How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: Molecular simulations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  R. Berry,et al.  Simulation of mutation: Influence of a ''side group'' on global minimum structure and dynamics of a protein model , 1999 .

[35]  F. Hartl,et al.  The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP , 1993, FEBS letters.

[37]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein , 2002, Science.

[38]  RosemanAM ChenS FurtakK FentonWA SaibilHR HorwichAL RyeHS.  GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. , 1999 .

[39]  D A Agard,et al.  To fold or not to fold.... , 1993, Science.