Nanomanufacturing with DNA Origami: Factors Affecting the Kinetics and Yield of Quantum Dot Binding

Molecularly directed self-assembly has the potential to become a nanomanufacturing technology if the critical factors governing the kinetics and yield of defect-free self-assembled structures can be understood and controlled. The kinetics of streptavidin-functionalized quantum dots binding to biontinylated DNA origami are quantitatively evaluated and to what extent the reaction rate and binding efficiency are controlled by the valency of the binding location, the biotin linker length, and the organization, and spacing of the binding locations on the DNA is shown. Yield improvement is systematically determined as a function of the valency of the binding locations and as a function of the quantum dot spacing. In addition, the kinetic studies show that the binding rate increases with increasing linker length, but that the yield saturates at the same level for long incubation times. The forward and backward reaction rate coefficients are determined using a nonlinear least squares fit to the measured binding kinetics, providing considerable physical insight into the factors governing this type of self-assembly process. It is found that the value of the dissociation constant, Kd, for the DNA–nanoparticle complex considered here is up to seven orders of magnitude larger than that of the native biotin–streptavidin complex. This difference is attributed to the combined effect that the much larger size of the DNA origami and the quantum dot have on the translational and rotational diffusion constants.

[1]  R. Weiss,et al.  Binding of biotinylated DNA to streptavidin-coated polystyrene latex: effects of chain length and particle size. , 1996, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  Hao Yan,et al.  Template-directed nucleation and growth of inorganic nanoparticles on DNA scaffolds. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  D. Cramb,et al.  A two-photon excitation fluorescence cross-correlation assay for a model ligand-receptor binding system using quantum dots. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[4]  N. Seeman,et al.  Crystalline two-dimensional DNA-origami arrays. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  Lutz Trahms,et al.  Quantification of specific bindings of biomolecules by magnetorelaxometry , 2008, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[6]  S. Kim,et al.  N-hexanoyl chitosan stabilized magnetic nanoparticles: Implication for cellular labeling and magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[7]  Haim H Bau,et al.  Microfluidic, bead-based assay: Theory and experiments. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[8]  Chunhai Fan,et al.  In situ monitoring of single molecule binding reactions with time-lapse atomic force microscopy on functionalized DNA origami. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[9]  Hao Yan,et al.  Interconnecting gold islands with DNA origami nanotubes. , 2010, Nano letters.

[10]  J. Wendoloski,et al.  Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. , 1989, Science.

[11]  Hao Yan,et al.  DNA-origami-directed self-assembly of discrete silver-nanoparticle architectures. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[12]  Ryan J. Kershner,et al.  Placement and orientation of individual DNA shapes on lithographically patterned surfaces. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[13]  Hao Yan,et al.  Gold nanoparticle self-similar chain structure organized by DNA origami. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Programmed-assembly system using DNA jigsaw pieces. , 2010, Chemistry.

[15]  W. Reichert,et al.  Influence of biotin lipid surface density and accessibility on avidin binding to the tip of an optical fiber sensor , 1992 .

[16]  W. B. Knowlton,et al.  Programmable Periodicity of Quantum Dot Arrays with DNA Origami Nanotubes , 2010, Nano letters.

[17]  Ashutosh Chilkoti,et al.  Molecular Origins of the Slow Streptavidin-Biotin Dissociation Kinetics , 1995 .

[18]  Jones Ml,et al.  Noncooperativity of biotin binding to tetrameric streptavidin. , 1995 .

[19]  Wael Mamdouh,et al.  Single-molecule chemical reactions on DNA origami. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[20]  C R Cantor,et al.  Cooperative biotin binding by streptavidin. Electrophoretic behavior and subunit association of streptavidin in the presence of 6 M urea. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  Masayuki Endo,et al.  Inside Cover: Programmed‐Assembly System Using DNA Jigsaw Pieces (Chem. Eur. J. 18/2010) , 2010 .

[22]  G. López,et al.  Ligand Receptor Dynamics at Streptavidin-Coated Particle Surfaces: A Flow Cytometric and Spectrofluorimetric Study , 1999 .

[23]  G. López,et al.  Peptides, antibodies, and FRET on beads in flow cytometry: A model system using fluoresceinated and biotinylated beta-endorphin. , 1999, Cytometry.

[24]  Nadrian C. Seeman,et al.  An Overview of Structural DNA Nanotechnology , 2007, Molecular biotechnology.

[25]  David Neff,et al.  NTA directed protein nanopatterning on DNA Origami nanoconstructs. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  Erik Winfree,et al.  An information-bearing seed for nucleating algorithmic self-assembly , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  L. Stols,et al.  Sensitive fluorescence-based thermodynamic and kinetic measurements of DNA hybridization in solution. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[28]  C. Niemeyer,et al.  DNA‐Based Assembly of Metal Nanoparticles , 2005 .

[29]  Hao Yan,et al.  Toward reliable gold nanoparticle patterning on self-assembled DNA nanoscaffold. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  T. LaBean,et al.  Connecting the nanodots: programmable nanofabrication of fused metal shapes on DNA templates. , 2011, Nano letters.

[31]  P. Rothemund Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[32]  Thomas H. LaBean,et al.  Constructing novel materials with DNA , 2007 .

[33]  Jennifer N Cha,et al.  Large-area spatially ordered arrays of gold nanoparticles directed by lithographically confined DNA origami. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[34]  B. Lentrichia,et al.  Effects of diffusion limitation on binding of soluble ligand to avidin-coupled latex particles , 1989 .

[35]  Hao Yan,et al.  Self-assembled DNA nanostructures for distance-dependent multivalent ligand-protein binding. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[36]  C. Chignell,et al.  A spin label study of egg white avidin. , 1975, The Journal of biological chemistry.