Airborne laser scanning for vegetation structure quantification in a south east Australian scrubby forest-woodland

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) has the potential to capture a range vegetation structural metrics, but most studies have focussed on conifer or mixed conifer-deciduous cool-temperate or boreal forests. This study focuses on a warm-temperate eucalypt forest, where two epochs of ALS data, captured approximately 2 years apart, were compared with plot and transect field data collected after the second ALS epoch. Linear regression was used to compare metrics from field and ALS data, and Student's t-tests were used to compare metrics from the two ALS epochs. Statistically significant relationships were found for tree height (R2 = 0.915; SE = 2.08 m; P < 0.01) and canopy cover (R2 = 0.508; SE = 16.4%; P < 0.01). Foliage projective cover was also significantly correlated (R2 = 0.916; SE = 4.5%; P < 0.01) at a 10-m stratification, but not at the typically computed 2-m stratification, because of the presence of a tall scrubby understorey. Statistically significant values were also obtained from ALS data captured 2 years earlier, although correlation was not as strong, most likely because of the greater interval between fieldwork and ALS capture. Importantly, significant agreement was found for all metrics when the two ALS epochs were compared, suggesting that the metrics are robust.

[1]  S. Ustin,et al.  Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling , 2003 .

[2]  Benoît St-Onge,et al.  Spatially explicit characterization of boreal forest gap dynamics using multi-temporal lidar data , 2008 .

[3]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[4]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic detection of harvested trees and determination of forest growth using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[5]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Assessing sensor effects and effects of leaf-off and leaf-on canopy conditions on biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data , 2005 .

[6]  C. Hopkinson The influence of flying altitude, beam divergence, and pulse repetition frequency on laser pulse return intensity and canopy frequency distribution , 2007 .

[7]  R. Specht,et al.  The balance between the foliage projective covers of overstorey and understorey strata in Australian vegetation , 1981 .

[8]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude , 2006 .

[9]  D. Weller,et al.  Assessment and monitoring of foliage projected cover and canopy height across native vegetation in Queensland, Australia, using laser profiler data , 2003 .

[10]  David Cheal,et al.  Assessing the quality of native vegetation: The 'habitat hectares' approach , 2003 .

[11]  Stuart E. Bunn,et al.  Flora and fauna assemblages vary with local topography in a subtropical eucalypt forest , 2001 .

[12]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Obtaining plotwise mean height and volume growth in boreal forests using multi‐temporal laser surveys and various change detection techniques , 2008 .

[13]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Development of a simulation model to predict LiDAR interception in forested environments , 2007 .

[14]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[15]  N. Coops,et al.  Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests , 2003 .

[16]  Klaus I. Itten,et al.  Assessment of the influence of flying altitude and scan angle on biophysical vegetation products derived from airborne laser scanning , 2008 .

[17]  Tomas Brandtberg Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[18]  P. Gibbons,et al.  An objective and quantitative methodology for constructing an index of stand structural complexity , 2006 .

[19]  E. Baafi,et al.  An evaluation of airborne laser scan data for coalmine subsidence mapping , 2007 .

[20]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Comparison of forest attributes extracted from fine spatial resolution multispectral and lidar data , 2004 .

[21]  D. Roberts,et al.  Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape , 2004 .

[22]  H. Shugart A Theory of Forest Dynamics , 1984 .

[23]  Mark Noonan,et al.  The post-fire measurement of fire severity and intensity in the Christmas 2001 Sydney wildfires , 2004 .

[24]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Change Detection Techniques for Canopy Height Growth Measurements Using Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 2006 .

[25]  The crown‐gap ratio (C) and crown cover: The field study , 1988 .

[26]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  Quantifying Australian forest floristics and structure using small footprint LiDAR and large scale aerial photography , 2006 .

[27]  Peter Bunting,et al.  Retrieving forest biomass through integration of CASI and LiDAR data , 2008 .

[28]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[29]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[30]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  A LiDAR-derived canopy density model for tree stem and crown mapping in Australian forests , 2007 .

[31]  Y. Hu,et al.  Mapping the height and above‐ground biomass of a mixed forest using lidar and stereo Ikonos images , 2008 .

[32]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[33]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  Patterns of tree species richness in relation to environment in southeastern New South Wales, Australia , 1996 .

[34]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimating forest growth using canopy metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2005 .

[35]  David A. Keith,et al.  Observer variation in field assessments of vegetation condition: Implications for biodiversity conservation , 2009 .

[36]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[37]  N. Coops,et al.  Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR , 2007, Trees.

[38]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[39]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Examining the Influence of Changing Laser Pulse Repetition Frequencies on Conifer Forest Canopy Returns , 2006 .

[40]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest with vertical foliage, using cover and fullframe fisheye photography , 2007 .

[41]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[42]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .