Making those who cannot see look best: effects of visual resume formatting on ratings of job applicants with blindness.

OBJECTIVE Although general attitudes toward individuals with disabilities are often positive, these perceptions do not always lead to equal footing in the hiring process. This study examined stereotypes of job applicants perceived to be blind and the role of applicant blindness in hireability ratings made by human resource managers. Specifically, we highlighted a unique challenge for individuals who cannot see: the visual formatting of resumes. DESIGN Human resource managers (N = 249) evaluated the visually formatted or unformatted resumes of hypothetical job applicants who were portrayed as blind or sighted and rated applicant hireability and personality characteristics. RESULTS Although applicants perceived to be blind were perceived as more conscientious and agreeable by human resource managers, these positive evaluations did not translate into favorable hireability evaluations. CONCLUSION Because human resource managers severely penalize applicants who do not attend to visual, nonfunctional resume presentation, applicants who cannot see are apt to find themselves disadvantaged in the hiring process. The implications of these findings for organizations, job seekers, and rehabilitation professionals are discussed.

[1]  C. Crandall,et al.  Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  R. Perry,et al.  Reactions to stigmas among Canadian students : Testing an attribution-affect-help judgment model , 1998 .

[3]  A. Denisi,et al.  The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability–job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. , 1998 .

[4]  B. Rosen,et al.  Personnel Professionals' Reactions to Chronological and Functional Résumé Formats , 1987 .

[5]  Dianna L. Stone,et al.  A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations , 1996 .

[6]  Gwen E. Jones Advancement opportunity issues for persons with disabilities , 1997 .

[7]  J. Piliavin,et al.  The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction: the other side. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  K. Klein,et al.  Effects of disability, gender, and job level on ratings of job applicants. , 2001 .

[9]  Eva Louvet,et al.  Social judgment toward job applicants with disabilities: Perception of personal qualities and competences. , 2007 .

[10]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Helping the Handicapped: How Realistic is the Performance Feedback Received by the Physically Handicapped , 1979 .

[11]  Ladonna L. Rush Affective reactions to multiple social stigmas , 1998 .

[12]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments , 2008 .

[13]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[14]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[16]  M. Biernat,et al.  She Swings, She Hits, She’s Great, She’s Benched: Implications of Gender-Based Shifting Standards for Judgment and Behavior , 2002 .

[17]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  A. Denisi,et al.  The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: the role of disability-job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Brian K. Miller,et al.  Factors Influencing the Inflation of Task Performance Ratings for Workers With Disabilities and Contextual Performance Ratings for Their Coworkers , 2005 .

[20]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women , 2001 .

[21]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  The Efects of Physical Deviance upon Face-to-Face Interaction , 1966 .