Optimization of System Parameters for Liquid Rocket Engines with Gas-Generator Cycles

System design of liquid rocket engines must consider engine performance, weight, cost, and reliability requirements. A general design optimization framework has been developed in this paper to select the best system parameters for liquid rocket engines with gas-generator cycles. The object is to maximize the specific impulse and vacuum thrust-to-weight ratio of the engine with given system requirements and design assumptions by changing thrust-chamber pressure and mixture ratio. The system analysis, along with the engine weight estimation, is based on a modular scheme. Multidisciplinary design optimization formulations including multidisciplinary feasible and collaborative optimization are used, evaluated, and compared during the optimization process. Several techniques of multi-objective processing are also used to identify the Pareto frontier and the optimal compromise solutions. A proposed cryogenic-propellant engine using liquid oxygen and hydrogen with a gas-generator cycle is studied as a specific example. Moreover, uncertainties in the engine operation, such as thrust-chamber pressure and mixture ratio, are taken into account as random variables in the reliability-based optimization. Results are presented to illustrate the tradeoff between the engine performance and reliability requirements.

[1]  A. C. Charania,et al.  REDTOP-2: Rocket Engine Design Tool Featuring Engine Performance, Weight, Cost, and Reliability , 2004 .

[2]  Lawrence L. Green,et al.  Probabilistic Methods for Uncertainty Propagation Applied to Aircraft Design , 2002 .

[3]  Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al.  Initial Results of an MDO Method Evaluation Study , 1998 .

[4]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .

[5]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design , 1996 .

[6]  Guoqiu Liu,et al.  The oxygen/hydrogen rocket engine for Long March vehicle , 1995 .

[7]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Execution of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approaches on Common Test Problems , 1997 .

[8]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Timothy K. Hasselman,et al.  Reliability based structural design optimization for practical applications , 1997 .

[10]  James Hulka,et al.  Cycles for Earth-to-Orbit Propulsion , 1998 .

[11]  St. Germain,et al.  Technique for the optimization of the powerhead configuration and performance of liquid rocket engines , 2003 .

[12]  J. P. Evans,et al.  Interdigitation for effective design space exploration using iSIGHT , 2002 .

[13]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  An updated survey of evolutionary multiobjective optimization techniques: state of the art and future trends , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[14]  Cai Guo.  Numerical simulation of C-H-O-N system liquid rocket engine nozzle flow , 2002 .

[15]  Wang Xiao.  Hybrid genetic algorithm and its application in multi-objective aerodynamic optimization design of airfoil , 2001 .

[16]  Kroo Ilan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design , 1994 .

[17]  John R. Olds,et al.  SCORES: Web-Based Rocket Propulsion Analysis for Space Transportation System Design , 1999 .

[18]  John Bradford,et al.  SCORES-II Design Tool for Liquid Rocket Engine Analysis , 2002 .

[19]  Armin Isselhorst.  euces: european cryogenic engineering software tool , 2006 .

[20]  Michael Binder.  An RL10A-3-3A rocket engine model using the Rocket Engine Transient Simulator (ROCETS) software , 1993 .

[21]  Tomoyuki Hiroyasu,et al.  NCGA: Neighborhood Cultivation Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems , 2002, GECCO Late Breaking Papers.

[22]  C.C.H. Borges,et al.  A non-generational genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[23]  M Alexandrov Natalia,et al.  Analytical and Computational Aspects of Collaborative Optimization , 2000 .

[24]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Numerical difficulties associated with using equality constraints to achieve multi-level decomposition in structural optimization , 1986 .

[25]  Christoph Goertz,et al.  A Modular Method for the Analysis of Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles , 1995 .