Effects of Peyton's Four-Step Approach on Objective Performance Measures in Technical Skills Training: A Controlled Trial

Background: Although skills-lab training is widely used for training undergraduates in technical procedures, the way in which clinical skills are to be used and instructed remains a matter of debate. Purpose: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the learning outcome of two different instructional approaches in the context of acquiring procedural–technical skills. Methods: Volunteer 2nd- and 3rd-year medical students were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving instruction according to Peyton's Four-Step Approach (IG; n = 17) or to a control group receiving standard instruction (CG; n = 17). Both groups were taught gastric-tube insertion using a manikin. Following each of the two forms of instruction, participants’ first independent gastric-tube insertions were video recorded and scored by two independent video assessors using binary checklists and global rating forms. The time required for each instructional approach and for the first independent performance of the skill was measured. Results: A total of 34 students agreed to participate in the trial. There were no statistically significant group differences with regard to age, sex, completed education in a medical profession, or completed medical clerkships. The groups did not differ in terms of correct stepwise performance of the procedure as assessed by a binary checklist (p < .802). However, ratings based on global rating scales assessing professionalism and accompanying patient-doctor communication proved significantly better in IG (both ps < .001). The length of the different instructional approaches did not differ significantly between the two groups (IG: 605 ± 65 s; CG: 572 ± 79 s; p < .122), but the time needed for the first independent performance of gastric-tube placement on the manikin was significantly shorter in IG (IG: 168 ± 30 s; CG: 242 ± 53 s; p < .001). Conclusions: Peyton's Four-Step Approach is superior to standard instruction with respect to professionalism and accompanying doctor–patient communication and leads to faster performance when trainees perform the learned skill for the first time.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[2]  Fernando Bello,et al.  Training and Assessment of Procedural Skills in Context using an Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI) , 2007, MMVR.

[3]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  Can medical schools rely on clerkships to train students in basic clinical skills? , 1999, Medical education.

[4]  Jeanie Goddard,et al.  Teaching as Theatre , 2008 .

[5]  G. Regehr,et al.  OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  Jon Veloski,et al.  Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7 , 2006, Medical teacher.

[7]  L. Benjamin.  Selection, teaching and training in ophthalmology , 2005, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[8]  S. Zipfel,et al.  Undergraduate technical skills training guided by student tutors – Analysis of tutors' attitudes, tutees' acceptance and learning progress in an innovative teaching model , 2008, BMC medical education.

[9]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[10]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Motor Imagery in Physical Therapist Practice , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[11]  W. Herzog,et al.  Role-playing for more realistic technical skills training , 2005, Medical teacher.

[12]  A. Scherpbier,et al.  Correlation of a written test of skills and a performance based test: a study in two traditional medical schools , 2001, Medical teacher.

[13]  Michael Callaghan,et al.  Motor Imagery Boosts Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in the Attainment and Retention of Range-of -Motion at the Hip Joint. , 2004, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[14]  C. Nikendei,et al.  Peer‐assisted versus faculty staff‐led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial , 2009, Medical education.

[15]  C. Nikendei,et al.  Effects of basic clinical skills training on objective structured clinical examination performance , 2005, Medical education.

[16]  John Cohen.  Social Learning and Imitation , 1945, Nature.

[17]  Ara Darzi,et al.  The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training. , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  Marc Immenroth,et al.  Mental Training in Surgical Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[19]  Rafael E. Riveros,et al.  Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 2005 .

[20]  R. Brennan.  Coefficients and Indices in Generalizability Theory , 2003 .

[21]  K. Kudsk,et al.  Clinical costs of feeding tube placement. , 2007, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[22]  Jane Kidd,et al.  An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures , 2002, Medical education.

[23]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[24]  Brian Hodges,et al.  Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training , 2003, Medical education.

[25]  C. Ringsted,et al.  Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills , 2007, Medical teacher.

[26]  R. Clouse,et al.  Complications related to feeding tube placement , 2007, Current opinion in gastroenterology.

[27]  Jing Luo,et al.  Sport expert's motor imagery: Functional imaging of professional motor skills and simple motor skills , 2010, Brain Research.

[28]  R. Reznick,et al.  Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE‐format examination , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[29]  A. Darzi,et al.  Assessing procedural skills in context: exploring the feasibility of an Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI) , 2006, Medical education.

[30]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[31]  J. Hamdorf,et al.  Teaching on the run tips 5: teaching a skill , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[32]  P Bradley,et al.  One year's experience with a clinical skills resource centre , 1999, Medical education.

[33]  Robert Burton,et al.  A systematic review of medical skills laboratory training: where to from here? , 2007, Medical education.

[34]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice , 2006, Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Zipfel,et al.  Integration of role-playing into technical skills training: a randomized controlled trial , 2007, Medical teacher.

[36]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  Effectiveness of basic clinical skills training programmes: a cross‐sectional comparison of four medical schools , 2001, Medical education.

[37]  T. Schilling,et al.  Integriertes Skills-Lab-Konzept für die studentische Ausbildung in der Inneren Medizin , 2005 .

[38]  J. Dacre,et al.  The Development of a Clinical Skills Centre , 1996, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.