Sequence-dependent cooperative binding of p53 to DNA targets and its relationship to the structural properties of the DNA targets

The prime mechanism by which p53 acts as a tumor suppressor is as a transcription factor regulating the expression of diverse downstream genes. The DNA-binding domain of p53 (p53DBD) interacts with defined DNA sites and is the main target for mutations in human primary tumors. Here, we show that the CWWG motif, found in the center of each consensus p53 half-site, is a key player in p53/DNA interactions. Gel-mobility-shift assays provide a unique opportunity to directly observe the various oligomeric complexes formed between p53DBD and its target sites. We demonstrate that p53DBD binds to p53 consensus sites containing CATG with relatively low cooperativity, as both dimers and tetramers, and with even lower cooperativity to such sites containing spacer sequences. p53DBD binds to sites containing CAAG and CTAG with measurable affinity only when imbedded in two contiguous p53 half-sites and only as tetramers (with very high cooperativity). There are three orders-of-magnitude difference in the cooperativity of interaction between sites differing in their non-contacted step, and further two orders-of-magnitude difference as a function of spacer sequences. By experimentally measuring the global structural properties of these sites, by cyclization kinetics of DNA minicircles, we correlate these differences with the torsional flexibility of the binding sites.

[1]  Alberto Inga,et al.  The expanding universe of p53 targets , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  R. Zeillinger,et al.  Alternative splicing of p53 and p73: the novel p53 splice variant p53δ is an independent prognostic marker in ovarian cancer , 2010, Oncogene.

[3]  P. Schuck Protein interactions : biophysical approaches for the study of complex reversible systems , 2007 .

[4]  Donald M. Crothers,et al.  High-throughput approach for detection of DNA bending and flexibility based on cyclization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  R J DUBOS,et al.  Health and disease. , 1960, JAMA.

[6]  M. Fried,et al.  Analysis of Protein-DNA Equilibria by Native Gel Electrophoresis , 2007 .

[7]  C. Klein,et al.  Cooperative binding of p53 to DNA: regulation by protein-protein interactions through a double salt bridge. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  J. Bourdon,et al.  The isoforms of the p53 protein. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[9]  Douglas A. Bell,et al.  Probing the Functional Impact of Sequence Variation on p53-DNA Interactions Using a Novel Microsphere Assay for Protein-DNA Binding with Human Cell Extracts , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[10]  Nicholas R. Cozzarelli,et al.  DNA topology and its biological effects , 1990 .

[11]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Definition of a consensus binding site for p53 , 1992, Nature Genetics.

[12]  A. Fersht,et al.  Comparative binding of p53 to its promoter and DNA recognition elements. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. E. Rubio,et al.  The Theory of Linear Systems , 1971 .

[14]  C. Klein,et al.  NMR Spectroscopy Reveals the Solution Dimerization Interface of p53 Core Domains Bound to Their Consensus DNA* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  G. Ya. Wiederschain,et al.  The proteomics protocols handbook , 2006, Biochemistry (Moscow).

[16]  D. Crothers,et al.  Statistical mechanics of sequence-dependent circular DNA and its application for DNA cyclization. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[17]  M. Oren,et al.  Decision making by p53: life, death and cancer , 2003, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[18]  P. Tegtmeyer,et al.  Interaction of p53 with its consensus DNA-binding site , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  Homer Jacobson,et al.  Intramolecular Reaction in Polycondensations. I. The Theory of Linear Systems , 1950 .

[20]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from protein-DNA crystal complexes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  DNA flexibility studied by covalent closure of short fragments into circles. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  T. Soussi,et al.  Splice mutations in the p53 gene: case report and review of the literature , 2003, Human mutation.

[23]  Ronen Marmorstein,et al.  Structure of the p53 Core Domain Dimer Bound to DNA*♦ , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  D. Crothers,et al.  DNA bending, flexibility, and helical repeat by cyclization kinetics. , 1992, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  Bei Wang,et al.  Redefining the p53 response element , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Yongheng Chen,et al.  Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. , 2010, Structure.

[27]  D. Rabinovich,et al.  The effect of the base sequence on the fine structure of the DNA double helix. , 1986, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[28]  W. Deppert,et al.  A Novel Human p53 Isoform Is an Essential Element of the ATR-Intra-S Phase Checkpoint , 2005, Cell.

[29]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  B-DNA twisting correlates with base-pair morphology. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  T. Haran,et al.  Signals for TBP/TATA box recognition. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  D. Bell,et al.  Noncanonical DNA Motifs as Transactivation Targets by Wild Type and Mutant p53 , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[32]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Four p53 DNA-binding domain peptides bind natural p53-response elements and bend the DNA. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  p53-induced DNA bending and twisting: p53 tetramer binds on the outer side of a DNA loop and increases DNA twisting. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  D. Rau,et al.  The flexibility of alternating dA-dT sequences. , 1985, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[35]  A. Fersht,et al.  Cooperative binding of tetrameric p53 to DNA. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  C. R. Calladine,et al.  Conformational characteristics of DNA: empirical classifications and a hypothesis for the conformational behaviour of dinucleotide steps , 1997, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[37]  C. Y. Huang Determination of binding stoichiometry by the continuous variation method: the Job plot. , 1982, Methods in enzymology.

[38]  D. Menendez,et al.  A Regulatory Loop Composed of RAP80-HDM2-p53 Provides RAP80-enhanced p53 Degradation by HDM2 in Response to DNA Damage* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  T. Haran,et al.  Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  R. Dickerson,et al.  DNA bending: the prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[42]  J. Shay,et al.  A transcriptionally active DNA-binding site for human p53 protein complexes , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[43]  D. Menendez,et al.  A Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in a Half-Binding Site Creates p53 and Estrogen Receptor Control of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[44]  Donald M. Crothers,et al.  Physical Chemistry: with Applications to the Life Sciences , 1979 .

[45]  Ting Wang,et al.  Groups of p53 target genes involved in specific p53 downstream effects cluster into different classes of DNA binding sites , 2002, Oncogene.

[46]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[47]  J. Bourdon,et al.  p53 and its isoforms in cancer , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[48]  R E Harrington,et al.  Bending and Torsional Flexibility of G/C-rich Sequences as Determined by Cyclization Assays (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  T. Haran,et al.  Repressor assembly at trp binding sites is dependent on the identity of the intervening dinucleotide between the binding half sites. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  J. Widom,et al.  Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics , 2001, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[51]  P. Hainaut,et al.  p53 isoforms - A conspiracy to kidnap p53 tumor suppressor activity? , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[52]  D. Menendez,et al.  A SNP in the flt-1 promoter integrates the VEGF system into the p53 transcriptional network , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  J. Michael Schurr,et al.  Dependence of the torsional rigidity of DNA on base composition , 1990, Nature.

[54]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. , 1994, Science.

[55]  M. Brenowitz,et al.  DNA structure and flexibility in the sequence-specific binding of papillomavirus E2 proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[57]  Xin Lu,et al.  Live or let die: the cell's response to p53 , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[58]  K. Struhl,et al.  GCN4, a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, binds as a dimer to target DNA. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[59]  M. Brenowitz,et al.  Determination of binding constants for cooperative site-specific protein-DNA interactions using the gel mobility-shift assay. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[60]  Z. Weng,et al.  A Global Map of p53 Transcription-Factor Binding Sites in the Human Genome , 2006, Cell.

[61]  Karen H. Vousden,et al.  p53 in health and disease , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[62]  J. Bourdon,et al.  p53 family members in cancer diagnosis and treatment. , 2010, Seminars in cancer biology.

[63]  M. Kitayner,et al.  Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[64]  T. Hupp,et al.  Regulation of p53 protein function through alterations in protein-folding pathways , 1999, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[65]  S. Neidle Oxford handbook of nucleic acid structure , 1998 .

[66]  K. Malecka,et al.  Crystal Structure of a p53 Core Tetramer Bound to DNA , 2008, Oncogene.

[67]  M G Fried,et al.  Electrophoretic analysis of multiple protein‐DNA interactions , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[68]  Vadim V. Demidov,et al.  Nucleic Acids: Structures, Properties and Functions , 2001 .

[69]  C. Prives,et al.  Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53 , 2009, Cell.

[70]  David P Lane,et al.  p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity. , 2005, Genes & development.

[71]  C. Prives,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by p53: one protein, many possibilities , 2006, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[72]  John M. Walker,et al.  The Proteomics Protocols Handbook , 2005, Humana Press.

[73]  J. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[74]  B. Honig,et al.  Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[75]  Antonina Andreeva,et al.  Core domain interactions in full-length p53 in solution , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  V. Rotter,et al.  Transcription regulation by mutant p53 , 2007, Oncogene.

[77]  T. Haran,et al.  TBP flanking sequences: asymmetry of binding, long-range effects and consensus sequences , 2006, Nucleic Acids Research.

[78]  A. Fersht,et al.  Recognition of DNA by p53 core domain and location of intermolecular contacts of cooperative binding. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[79]  K. McLure,et al.  How p53 binds DNA as a tetramer , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[80]  J. Carey,et al.  Gel retardation at low pH resolves trp repressor-DNA complexes for quantitative study. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  Francesca Storici,et al.  Differential Transactivation by the p53 Transcription Factor Is Highly Dependent on p53 Level and Promoter Target Sequence , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[82]  J. Cann Phenomenological theory of gel electrophoresis of protein-nucleic acid complexes. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[83]  D. Crothers,et al.  Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[84]  K. Kinzler,et al.  p53 tagged sites from human genomic DNA. , 1994, Human molecular genetics.

[85]  J. Ott,et al.  The p53MH algorithm and its application in detecting p53-responsive genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  M. Fried Measurement of protein‐DNA interaction parameters by electrophoresis mobility shift assay , 1989, Electrophoresis.

[87]  Yongli Zhang,et al.  Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  C. Prives,et al.  The N Terminus of p53 Regulates Its Dissociation from DNA* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.