The coordination of limb movements with different kinematic patterns

The principles underlying the coordination of limb movements with different spatiotemporal features were explored. After an initial training session in which the same unidirectional movement had to be performed with both upper limbs, subjects attempted to coordinate two different movements in a second session, i.e., the learned unidirectional movement in the left limb and a new double reversal movement in the right limb. The findings uncovered a wide variety in patterns of interlimb dependence among and within subjects, going from a high degree of dependence to relative independence. The relationship between limbs was studied by means of a detailed analysis of the displacement and acceleration patterns and the electromyographic activity of the major muscles involved. The general underlying principle that appeared to account for the diversity in movement organization was this: higher independence between limb movements is achieved when subjects initiate the movements to be coordinated successively. This asynchrony in movement onset can possibly be viewed as an attempt to safeguard against interference.

[1]  J. Duncan Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  The attention demands of movements. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  E. Holst Die relative Koordination , 1939 .

[4]  Carol A. Putnam,et al.  On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  M. Peters Simultaneous performance of two motor activities: The factor of timing , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  M. Peters,et al.  Attentional Asymmetries during Concurrent Bimanual Performance , 1981 .

[7]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Paolo Cavallari,et al.  Preferential coupling between voluntary movements of ipsilateral limbs , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  D. Corcos,et al.  Two-Handed Movement Control , 1984 .

[10]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects , 1984 .

[11]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[12]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[13]  Easton Ta On the normal use of reflexes. , 1972 .

[14]  D. Allport,et al.  On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Shaffer Lh Rhythm and timing in skill. , 1982 .

[16]  Pietro Morasso,et al.  Coordination aspects of arm trajectory formation , 1983 .

[17]  M. Peters,et al.  Constraints in the performance of bimanual tasks and their expression in unskilled and skilled subjects , 1985 .

[18]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Michael Peters,et al.  Performance of a Rubato-like Task: When Two Things Cannot Be Done at the Same Time , 1985 .

[20]  Charles B. Walter,et al.  Temporal quantification of electromyography with reference to motor control research , 1984 .

[21]  J. Kelso,et al.  A Dynamical Basis for Action Systems , 1984 .

[22]  J. Černáček Contralateral motor irradiation--cerebral dominance. Its changes in hemiparesis. , 1961, Archives of neurology.

[23]  A. M. Gentile,et al.  Coordination of the upper and lower extremities , 1984 .

[24]  L. Cohen Interaction between limbs during bimanual voluntary activity. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  J. Cooke,et al.  Matching of movements made independently by the two arms in normal humans. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.