A new genome‐driven integrated classification of breast cancer and its implications

Breast cancer is a group of heterogeneous diseases that show substantial variation in their molecular and clinical characteristics. This heterogeneity poses significant challenges not only in breast cancer management, but also in studying the biology of the disease. Recently, rapid progress has been made in understanding the genomic diversity of breast cancer. These advances led to the characterisation of a new genome‐driven integrated classification of breast cancer, which substantially refines the existing classification systems currently used. The novel classification integrates molecular information on the genomic and transcriptomic landscapes of breast cancer to define 10 integrative clusters, each associated with distinct clinical outcomes and providing new insights into the underlying biology and potential molecular drivers. These findings have profound implications both for the individualisation of treatment approaches, bringing us a step closer to the realisation of personalised cancer management in breast cancer, but also provide a new framework for studying the underlying biology of each novel subtype.

[1]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Subtyping of Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry to Investigate a Relationship between Subtype and Short and Long Term Survival: A Collaborative Analysis of Data for 10,159 Cases from 12 Studies , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[2]  I. Ellis,et al.  An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer , 2007, Genome Biology.

[3]  Jason I. Herschkowitz,et al.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  D. Miles,et al.  Safety of bevacizumab (BV) plus docetaxel (D) in patients (pts) with locally recurrent (LR) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who developed brain metastases during the AVADO phase III study. , 2009 .

[5]  Z. Werb,et al.  Zeppo1 is a novel metastasis promoter that represses E-cadherin expression and regulates p120-catenin isoform expression and localization. , 2011, Genes & development.

[6]  R. Bast,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[8]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Quantitative Image Analysis of Cellular Heterogeneity in Breast Tumors Complements Genomic Profiling , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  Van,et al.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[11]  BCL2 in breast cancer: A favourable prognostic marker across molecular subtypes and independent of adjuvant therapy received: Dawson S-J, Makretsov N, Blows FM, et al (Univ of Cambridge, UK; et al) Br J Cancer 103:668-675, 2010 , 2011 .

[12]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  X. Chen,et al.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  Ryan D. Morin,et al.  Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution , 2009, Nature.

[15]  J. Troge,et al.  Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing , 2011, Nature.

[16]  A. Krasnitz,et al.  Genomic Architecture Characterizes Tumor Progression Paths and Fate in Breast Cancer Patients , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[17]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  S. Fox,et al.  Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Shu Ichihara,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer. , 2006, Genome research.

[21]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Molecular Classification of Breast Carcinomas Using Tissue Microarrays , 2003, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[22]  P Mukonoweshuro,et al.  Audit of the histological definition of cervical transformation zone. , 2005, Journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  C. Caldas,et al.  Triple negative breast cancers: clinical and prognostic implications. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[24]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  Protein expression profiling identifies subclasses of breast cancer and predicts prognosis. , 2005, Cancer research.

[25]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  ZNF703 gene amplification at 8p12 specifies luminal B breast cancer , 2011, EMBO molecular medicine.

[26]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  COMPLEX LANDSCAPES OF SOMATIC REARRANGEMENT IN HUMAN BREAST CANCER GENOMES , 2009, Nature.

[27]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Cancer sequencing unravels clonal evolution , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[30]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  A. Mes-Masson,et al.  Subtype‐specific mutation of PPP2R1A in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas , 2011, The Journal of pathology.

[32]  G. Ball,et al.  High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[33]  Albert J. Fornace,et al.  Amplification of PPM1D in human tumors abrogates p53 tumor-suppressor activity , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[34]  A. Nobel,et al.  The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[35]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The Life History of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[36]  S. Tavaré,et al.  High-resolution aCGH and expression profiling identifies a novel genomic subtype of ER negative breast cancer , 2007, Genome Biology.

[37]  J. Blenis,et al.  mTOR Controls Cell Cycle Progression through Its Cell Growth Effectors S6K1 and 4E-BP1/Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[38]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[39]  B. Dutrillaux,et al.  Two‐color FISH characterization of i(1q) and der(1;16) in human breast cancer cells , 1993, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[40]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[41]  C. Caldas,et al.  Aurora kinase A outperforms Ki67 as a prognostic marker in ER-positive breast cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  Irmtraud M. Meyer,et al.  The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers , 2012, Nature.

[43]  Nicholas J. Wang,et al.  Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. , 2009, Cancer research.

[44]  S. Paik,et al.  Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer , 2012, Nature.

[46]  Diego Miranda-Saavedra,et al.  TGFβ induces the formation of tumour-initiating cells in claudinlow breast cancer , 2012, Nature Communications.

[47]  Gottfried Konecny,et al.  Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[48]  A. Hanby,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. , 1999, Cancer research.

[49]  R. Pearson,et al.  mTOR-Dependent Regulation of Ribosomal Gene Transcription Requires S6K1 and Is Mediated by Phosphorylation of the Carboxy-Terminal Activation Domain of the Nucleolar Transcription Factor UBF† , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[50]  Qiang Yu,et al.  B55β-associated PP2A complex controls PDK1-directed myc signaling and modulates rapamycin sensitivity in colorectal cancer. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[51]  Yudong D. He,et al.  A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer , 2002 .

[52]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Whole Genome Analysis Informs Breast Cancer Response to Aromatase Inhibition , 2012, Nature.

[53]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Genome Remodeling in a Basal-like Breast Cancer Metastasis and Xenograft , 2010, Nature.

[54]  J. Blenis,et al.  Mammalian cell size is controlled by mTOR and its downstream targets S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E. , 2002, Genes & development.

[55]  Fergus J. Couch,et al.  The 17q23 Amplicon and Breast Cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[56]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  A robust classifier of high predictive value to identify good prognosis patients in ER-negative breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[57]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes , 2012, Nature.

[59]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[60]  F M Blows,et al.  BCL2 in breast cancer: a favourable prognostic marker across molecular subtypes and independent of adjuvant therapy received , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[61]  Luke Hughes-Davies,et al.  EMSY Links the BRCA2 Pathway to Sporadic Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2003, Cell.

[62]  A. Kallioniemi,et al.  High-level amplification at 17q23 leads to coordinated overexpression of multiple adjacent genes in breast cancer , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[63]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  ZNF703 is a common Luminal B breast cancer oncogene that differentially regulates luminal and basal progenitors in human mammary epithelium , 2011, EMBO molecular medicine.

[64]  M. Stratton,et al.  A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[65]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  E. Gabrielson,et al.  High levels of the Mps1 checkpoint protein are protective of aneuploidy in breast cancer cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  G. Azabdaftari,et al.  Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types , 2009 .

[68]  F. Markowetz,et al.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.

[69]  Mark T. W. Ebbert,et al.  A Comparison of PAM50 Intrinsic Subtyping with Immunohistochemistry and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Tamoxifen-Treated Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[70]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.