The numerical simulation on ionospheric perturbations in electric field before large earthquakes

Abstract. Many observational results have shown electromagnetic abnormality in the ionosphere before large earthquakes. The theoretical simulation can help us to understand the internal mechanism of these anomalous electromagnetic signals resulted from seismic regions. In this paper, the horizontal and vertical components of electric and magnetic field at the topside ionosphere are simulated by using the full wave method that is based on an improved transfer matrix method in the lossy anisotropic horizontally stratified ionosphere. Taken account into two earthquakes with electric field perturbations recorded by the DEMETER satellite, the numerical results reveal that the propagation and penetration of ULF (ultra-low-frequency) electromagnetic waves into the ionosphere is related to the spatial distribution of electron and ion densities at different time and locations, in which the ion density has less effect than electron density on the field intensity. Compared with different frequency signals, the minimum values of electric and magnetic field excited by earthquakes can be detected by satellite in current detection capability have also been calculated, and the lower frequency wave can be detected easier.

[1]  G. A. Sobolev,et al.  The study of variations in geophysical fields near focal zones of Kamchatka , 1972 .

[2]  Z. Zhima,et al.  Possible Ionospheric Electromagnetic Perturbations , 2012 .

[3]  Satoshi Yagitani,et al.  Full Wave Analysis of the Australian Omega Signal Observed by the Akebono Satellite (Special Issue on 1992 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation) , 1993 .

[4]  C. E. Barton,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field : The seventh generation , 1997 .

[5]  Bodo W. Reinisch,et al.  International Reference Ionosphere 2000 , 2001 .

[6]  Dimitar Danov,et al.  Quasi-static electric fields phenomena in the ionosphere associated with pre- and post earthquake effects , 2008 .

[7]  V. Sorokin,et al.  Electrodynamic model of the lower atmosphere and the ionosphere coupling , 2001 .

[8]  Steven A. Cummer,et al.  Modeling electromagnetic propagation in the Earth-ionosphere waveguide , 2000 .

[9]  Isamu Nagano,et al.  Numerical calculation of electromagnetic waves in an anisotropic multilayered medium , 1975 .

[10]  Dieter Bilitza,et al.  International reference ionosphere , 1978 .

[11]  V. M. Chmyrev,et al.  Observation by space-borne detectors of electric fields and hydromagnetic waves in the ionosphere over an earthquake centre , 1989 .

[12]  Howard H. C. Chang,et al.  Radio waves in the ionosphere , 1962 .

[13]  J. Qian,et al.  The characteristics of quasistatic electric field perturbations observed by DEMETER satellite before large earthquakes , 2014 .

[14]  H. Lammer,et al.  Ionospheric conductivity effects on electrostatic field penetration into the ionosphere , 2008 .

[15]  M. Hayakawa,et al.  A perturbation of DC electric field caused by light ion adhesion to aerosols during the growth in seismic-related atmospheric radioactivity , 2007 .

[16]  H. Biernat,et al.  Decrease of the electric field penetration into the ionosphere due to low conductivity at the near ground atmospheric layer , 2010 .

[17]  K. C. Yeh,et al.  Theory of Ionospheric Waves , 1973 .

[18]  Sergey Pulinets,et al.  Quasielectrostatic Model of Atmosphere-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Coupling , 2000 .

[19]  R. Helliwell,et al.  Whistlers and Related Ionospheric Phenomena , 1965 .

[20]  F. Leblanc,et al.  ICE, the electric field experiment on DEMETER , 2006 .

[21]  M. Ladd,et al.  Low‐frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1990 .