Frogs Have Rules: Selective Attention Algorithms Regulate Chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae)

In various acoustic insects and frogs, females preferentially orient towards the leading of two or more males' advertisement signals that occur closely in time. Such preferences in receivers have apparently selected for timing mechanisms whereby male signallers actively refrain from calling immediately following the onset of a neighbour's call and thereby increase their production of leading calls. However, indiscriminate application of this inhibitory mechanism to all neighbours might severely reduce a male's calling rate, particularly in high density. Consequently, mechanisms of selective attention to only a subset of signalling neighbours are expected. Female Tungara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) exhibit strong preferences for leading male calls, and males refrain from calling immediately following a neighbour. Four-loudspeaker playback experiments demonstrated that males do selectively apply this inhibitory mechanism to only a subset of close signalling neighbours. Selective attention is regulated by a combination of sliding threshold and fixed number rules: (i) Attend to the loudest (nearest) conspecific neighbour and those additional ones whose calls are within 6–8 dB of the loudest one; (ii) attend to only two neighbours in total when the calls are weak or the second one is much farther than the first; (iii) attend to three neighbours when the calls are loud or all neighbours are approximately equidistant. The means by which such plasticity may be achieved and its potential adaptiveness are discussed.

[1]  Neville Passmore,et al.  Synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs , 1998, Nature.

[2]  H. Römer Environmental and Biological Constraints for the Evolution of Long-Range Signalling and Hearing in Acoustic Insects , 1993 .

[3]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Yikweon Jang,et al.  Mechanisms of selective attention in grasshopper choruses: who listens to whom? , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  R A Wyttenbach,et al.  Demonstration of the precedence effect in an insect. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  N. Aizawa Synchronous waving in an ocypodid crab, Ilyoplax pusilla : analyses of response patterns to video and real crabs , 1998 .

[7]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Psychoacoustics of female phonotaxis and the evolution of male signal interactions in Orthoptera , 1995 .

[8]  S. A. Perrill,et al.  Habituation in the green frog, Rana clamitans , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: inhibition, selective phonoresponse and signal competition , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice , 1993, Nature.

[11]  J. Buck Synchronous Rhythmic Flashing of Fireflies. II. , 1938, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[12]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Cooperation and Conflict in the Evolution of Signal Interactions , 1994 .

[13]  Patrick M. Zurek,et al.  The Precedence Effect , 1987 .

[14]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  J. Schwartz Why stop calling? A study of unison bout singing in a Neotropical treefrog , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  N. Passmore,et al.  Two-choice phonotaxis in Hyperolius marmoratus (Anura: Hyperoliidae): the effect of temporal variation in presented stimuli , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions , 1994 .

[19]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[20]  J Wang,et al.  Directional masking of phase locking in the amphibian auditory nerve. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  G. Pollack,et al.  Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.