Genomic divergence of zebu and taurine cattle identified through high-density SNP genotyping

BackgroundNatural selection has molded evolution across all taxa. At an arguable date of around 330,000 years ago there were already at least two different types of cattle that became ancestors of nearly all modern cattle, the Bos taurus taurus more adapted to temperate climates and the tropically adapted Bos taurus indicus. After domestication, human selection exponentially intensified these differences. To better understand the genetic differences between these subspecies and detect genomic regions potentially under divergent selection, animals from the International Bovine HapMap Experiment were genotyped for over 770,000 SNP across the genome and compared using smoothed FST. The taurine sample was represented by ten breeds and the contrasting zebu cohort by three breeds.ResultsEach cattle group evidenced similar numbers of polymorphic markers well distributed across the genome. Principal components analyses and unsupervised clustering confirmed the well-characterized main division of domestic cattle. The top 1% smoothed FST, potentially associated to positive selection, contained 48 genomic regions across 17 chromosomes. Nearly half of the top FST signals (n = 22) were previously detected using a lower density SNP assay. Amongst the strongest signals were the BTA7:~50 Mb and BTA14:~25 Mb; both regions harboring candidate genes and different patterns of linkage disequilibrium that potentially represent intrinsic differences between cattle types. The bottom 1% of the smoothed FST values, potentially associated to balancing selection, included 24 regions across 13 chromosomes. These regions often overlap with copy number variants, including the highly variable region at BTA23:~24 Mb that harbors a large number of MHC genes. Under these regions, 318 unique Ensembl genes are annotated with a significant overrepresentation of immune related pathways.ConclusionsGenomic regions that are potentially linked to purifying or balancing selection processes in domestic cattle were identified. These regions are of particular interest to understand the natural and human selective pressures to which these subspecies were exposed to and how the genetic background of these populations evolved in response to environmental challenges and human manipulation.

[1]  J E Pryce,et al.  Evidence for pleiotropism and recent selection in the PLAG1 region in Australian Beef cattle. , 2013, Animal genetics.

[2]  Daniel Helmer,et al.  Identifying early domestic cattle from Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites on the Middle Euphrates using sexual dimorphism , 2005 .

[3]  Paolo Ajmone-Marsan,et al.  On the origin of cattle: How aurochs became cattle and colonized the world , 2010 .

[4]  David H. Alexander,et al.  Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. , 2009, Genome research.

[5]  Mathieu Gautier,et al.  A whole genome Bayesian scan for adaptive genetic divergence in West African cattle , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[6]  A. Ibelli,et al.  Resistance of cattle of various genetic groups to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus and the relationship with coat traits. , 2012, Veterinary parasitology.

[7]  M. Goddard,et al.  A genome-wide association study of meat and carcass traits in Australian cattle. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[8]  K. Worley,et al.  The Genome Sequence of Taurine Cattle: A Window to Ruminant Biology and Evolution , 2009, Science.

[9]  Mathieu Gautier,et al.  Footprints of selection in the ancestral admixture of a New World Creole cattle breed , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[10]  Tad S Sonstegard,et al.  Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds. , 2010, Genome research.

[11]  D. Gianola,et al.  Application of site and haplotype-frequency based approaches for detecting selection signatures in cattle , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[12]  Bertrand Servin,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of the World's Sheep Breeds Reveals High Levels of Historic Mixture and Strong Recent Selection , 2012, PLoS biology.

[13]  W. Barendse,et al.  Effect of SNP origin on analyses of genetic diversity in cattle , 2010 .

[14]  S. Hiendleder,et al.  Complete mitochondrial genomes of Bos taurus and Bos indicus provide new insights into intra-species variation, taxonomy and domestication , 2008, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[15]  Mathieu Gautier,et al.  The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt,et al.  Mitochondrial genomes of extinct aurochs survive in domestic cattle , 2008, Current Biology.

[17]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Prediction of breed composition in an admixed cattle population. , 2012, Animal genetics.

[18]  A. Reverter,et al.  Candidate Genes Associated with Testicular Development, Sperm Quality, and Hormone Levels of Inhibin, Luteinizing Hormone, and Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 in Brahman Bulls1 , 2012, Biology of reproduction.

[19]  G Fordyce,et al.  Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[20]  C. J. O'Neill,et al.  Comparative evaluation of beef cattle breeds of African, European and Indian origins. 2. Resistance to cattle ticks and gastrointestinal nematodes , 1998 .

[21]  Stephen F. Schaffner,et al.  The X chromosome in population genetics , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  S. Wright,et al.  Genetical Structure of Populations , 1950, Nature.

[23]  Omer Gokcumen,et al.  Exploring the role of copy number variants in human adaptation. , 2012, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[24]  William Barendse,et al.  Genome wide signatures of positive selection: The comparison of independent samples and the identification of regions associated to traits , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[25]  Mark Daly,et al.  Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps , 2005, Bioinform..

[26]  Thomas J. Nicholas,et al.  Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  David R. Kelley,et al.  A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus , 2009, Genome Biology.

[28]  W. Barris,et al.  Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[29]  A. Reverter,et al.  Finding genes for economically important traits: Brahman cattle puberty , 2012 .

[30]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  G. McVean A Genealogical Interpretation of Principal Components Analysis , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[32]  Paolo Ajmone-Marsan,et al.  Identification of Selection Signatures in Cattle Breeds Selected for Dairy Production , 2010, Genetics.

[33]  Tom Druet,et al.  Variants modulating the expression of a chromosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine stature , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[34]  Robert D Schnabel,et al.  Genome-Wide Survey of SNP Variation Uncovers the Genetic Structure of Cattle Breeds , 2009, Science.

[35]  D. Bradley,et al.  Genetics and domestic cattle origins , 1998 .

[36]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Assessing population differentiation and isolation from single‐nucleotide polymorphism data , 2002 .

[37]  Robert D Schnabel,et al.  Copy number variation of individual cattle genomes using next-generation sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[39]  Anushya Muruganujan,et al.  PANTHER version 7: improved phylogenetic trees, orthologs and collaboration with the Gene Ontology Consortium , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  T. Gasser,et al.  A Flexible and Fast Method for Automatic Smoothing , 1991 .

[41]  P. Visscher,et al.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[42]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.