An Exact Algorithm for Group Formation to Promote Collaborative Learning

Collaborative learning has been widely used to foster students’ communication and joint knowledge construction. However, the classification of learners into well-structured groups is one of the most challenging tasks in the field. The aim of this study is to propose a novel method to form intra-heterogeneous and inter-homogeneous groups based on relevant student characteristics. Such a method allows for the consideration of multiple student characteristics and can handle both numerical and categorical characteristic types simultaneously. It assumes that the teacher provides an order of importance of the characteristics, then it solves the grouping problem as a lexicographic optimization problem in the given order. We formulate the problem in mixed integer linear programming (MILP) terms and solve it to optimality. A pilot experiment was conducted with 29 college freshmen considering three general characteristics (i.e., 13 specific features) including knowledge level, demographic information, and motivation. Results of such an experiment demonstrate the validity and computational feasibility of the algorithmic approach. Large-scale studies are needed to assess the impact of the proposed grouping method on students’ learning experience and academic achievement.

[1]  Carla M. Firetto,et al.  Exploring the influence of homogeneous versus heterogeneous grouping on students’ text-based discussions and comprehension , 2017 .

[2]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  R. Pekrun,et al.  The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire: Validation for Pre-Adolescent Students , 2015 .

[4]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[5]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  An optimized group formation scheme to promote collaborative problem-based learning , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Group Formation in CSCL: A Review of the State of the Art , 2017, HEFA.

[7]  Tom V. Mathew Genetic Algorithm , 2022 .

[8]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[9]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the measurement of achievement goals: critique, illustration, and application , 2008 .

[10]  Freydis Vogel,et al.  Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2020, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[11]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Applying the genetic encoded conceptual graph to grouping learning , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  W. S. Monroe,et al.  The measurement of achievement. , 1930 .

[13]  R. Land,et al.  Assigning Students in Group Work Projects. Can We Do Better than Random? , 2000 .

[14]  Miroslav Maric,et al.  Efficiency of using VNS algorithm for forming heterogeneous groups for CSCL learning , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  John Sweller,et al.  Can Collaborative Learning Improve the Effectiveness of Worked Examples in Learning Mathematics? , 2017 .

[17]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation, and Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2017 .

[18]  Weigang Lu,et al.  An improved genetic approach for composing optimal collaborative learning groups , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[19]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[20]  Sabine Graf,et al.  Forming Heterogeneous Groups for Intelligent Collaborative Learning Systems with Ant Colony Optimization , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[21]  E. Fatas,et al.  Not all group members are created equal: heterogeneous abilities in inter-group contests , 2018, Experimental Economics.

[22]  F. Phillips,et al.  Instructor-Assigned and Student-Selected Groups: A View from Inside , 2010 .

[23]  Tobias Hecking,et al.  Using Differences to Make a Difference: A Study on Heterogeneity of Learning Groups , 2015, CSCL.