Stereotactic core biopsy: Comparison of 11 gauge with 8 gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy.

[1]  J. Meyer,et al.  Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast cancers. The impact on subsequent surgical excisions. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[2]  L. Liberman,et al.  Impact of core biopsy on the surgical management of impalpable breast cancer. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  T. Krebs,et al.  Evaluation of 14- and 11-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  C. Kaufman,et al.  Excising the Reexcision: Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy Decreases Need for Reexcision of Breast Cancer , 1998, World Journal of Surgery.

[5]  C. Lee,et al.  Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Darrell N. Smith,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  S. Goodman,et al.  Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy devices. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  T. Helbich,et al.  Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  S. Povoski,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted Mammotome® system for ultrasound-guided diagnostic biopsy and selective excision of breast lesions , 2007, World journal of surgical oncology.

[11]  D. Vanel.  The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[12]  D. Giri,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  I. Schreer,et al.  False-negative results after stereotactically guided vacuum biopsy , 2007, European Radiology.

[14]  D. Wallwiener,et al.  Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A comparison of 11-gauge and 8-gauge needles in benign breast disease , 2008, World journal of surgical oncology.

[15]  V. Girardi,et al.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[16]  C Marsault,et al.  Accuracy of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a 10-gauge hand-held system. , 2009, Breast.

[17]  J. Rosenberg,et al.  False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  C. Lehman,et al.  Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of two vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems: Mammotome and Vacora , 2009, La radiologia medica.

[20]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications. , 2010, Radiology.