Cutting through the confusion of contemporary work

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the nature of contemporary work. There is much discussion surrounding the meaning of the term knowledge worker and the value these workers generate for the organisation. This paper agrees that the value to organisations of workers who possess knowledge is increasing but argues that the nature of the knowledge worker is unclear within current literature. It acknowledges that there is a high level of knowledge in contemporary work and that many workers can claim to be knowledgeable, however these workers while necessary to the firm do not provide it with competitive advantage.Design/methodology/approach – This paper argues that there are four tensions running through the literature on the nature of the knowledge worker and proposes that the elements that comprise knowledge work fall into three groups that are knowledge possession, knowledge activity and knowledge context. First, the nature of contemporary work and its relationship to traditional categorisati...

[1]  R. Reich The Work of Nations , 2006 .

[2]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[3]  Karen Shire,et al.  Re-Constituting Work: Trends towards Knowledge Work and Info-Normative Control , 1995 .

[4]  P. Bain,et al.  Taylorism, Targets and the Pursuit of Quantity and Quality by Call Centre Management , 2002 .

[5]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The New Realities , 1989 .

[6]  John Garrick,et al.  Knowledge work and the new demands of learning , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Hands, Hearts and Minds: Changing Work and Workers at the End of the Century , 1998 .

[8]  Chrissie Smith,et al.  Technical Workers: Class, Labourism and Trade Unionism , 1987 .

[9]  S. Barley The New World Of Work , 1996 .

[10]  E. Carayannis Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management , 1999 .

[11]  Paul Myers Knowledge Management and Organisational Design , 1996 .

[12]  P. Drucker The new society of organizations. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[13]  Eileen Appelbaum,et al.  The New American Workplace , 1993 .

[14]  F. Blackler KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[15]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[16]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[17]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Knowledge codifiability, resources, and science-based innovation , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  Alan Hudson,et al.  ‘Twenty years of schooling and you end up on the day shift’ , 2006 .

[19]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  The nonsense of knowledge management , 2002, Inf. Res..

[20]  D. Gallie Patterns of Skill Change: Upskilling, Deskilling or the Polarization of Skills? , 1991 .

[21]  P. Fleming,et al.  A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: getting below the surface of the growth of ‘knowledge work’ in Australia , 2004 .

[22]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[23]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  The process of knowledge management within organizations: a critical assessment of both theory and practice , 1999 .

[24]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[25]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[26]  Phil Taylor,et al.  ‘Bright Satanic Offices’: Intensification, Control and Team Taylorism , 1998 .

[27]  Kumar Krishan,et al.  Prophecy and Progress , 1978 .

[28]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[29]  P. Thompson,et al.  Ignorant Theory and Knowledgeable Workers: Interrogating the Connections between Knowledge, Skills and Services , 2001 .

[30]  N. D. Ahanotu,et al.  Empowerment and production workers: a knowledge‐based perspective , 1998 .

[31]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: Friends or foes? , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[32]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[33]  Mie Augier,et al.  Understanding context: its emergence, transformation and role in tacit knowledge sharing , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Odd Couple: Making Sense of the Curious Concept of Knowledge Management , 2001 .

[35]  Andrew L. Friedman,et al.  Industry and Labour , 1977 .

[36]  T. Friedman The Lexus and the Olive Tree , 1999 .

[37]  M. Boisot,et al.  Data, information and knowledge: have we got it right? , 2004 .

[38]  A. Fowler,et al.  Knowledge management in public service provision: the Child Support Agency , 2003 .

[39]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[40]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Catching the Wave: Workplace Reform in Australia , 1994 .

[41]  Bernard L. Rosenbaum Leading Today's Professional , 1991 .

[42]  Carl P. Zeithaml,et al.  Measuring organizational knowledge: a conceptual and methodological framework , 2003 .

[43]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[44]  Charles Despres,et al.  Human resource management in the knowledge age , 1995 .

[45]  D. Broadbent,et al.  On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge , 1984 .