Strategies for Linking Vertical Cooperative R&D to Commercialization in Korea

Abstract Since 1982, the government of Korea has actively promoted vertical cooperative R&D programs between government-sponsored research institutes (GRIs) and private firms. A number of firms participated in the programs because cooperative R&D could lower the risk and could contribute to rapid commercialization of many technologies. In this article, Chulwon Lee, Zong-Tae Bae, and Jinjoo Lee examine the effectiveness of participant firms' strategies for commercial utilization of cooperative R&D results, from the viewpoint of technology sourcing at the project level. The data have been obtained from 162 cases of vertical cooperative R&D projects from a diverse group of industries in Korea. Three different commercialization strategies are empirically derived through cluster analysis of the relative usage rates of cooperative R&D and of other supplementary technology acquisition methods. They find that the effectiveness of these strategy clusters varies significantly according to the types of innovation, that is, project-business relatedness. If the project belongs to an existing business area, in-house development augmented cooperative R&D strategy is the most effective. On the other hand, licensing-in supplemented cooperative R&D strategy is the most successful, if the project belongs to a new business area. Findings suggest that firms participating in cooperative R&D projects should try to utilize other supplementary technology acquisition methods in order to achieve commercial utilization of cooperative R&D results.

[1]  M. Aldenderfer Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Donald W. Barclay,et al.  Technology Transfer to the Private Sector: A Field Study of Manufacturer Buying behavior , 1992 .

[3]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application , 1983 .

[4]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The strategic management of R&D collaboration , 1992 .

[5]  E. Bohlin,et al.  External Technology Acquisition in Large Multi-Technology Corporations , 1992 .

[6]  F. Johne,et al.  Product development approaches in established firms , 1989 .

[7]  A.Bhanich Supapol,et al.  The commercialization of government-sponsored technologies: Canadian evidence , 1990 .

[8]  Zong-Tae Bae,et al.  Technology development processes: A model for a developing country with a global perspective , 1988 .

[9]  Jan P. Oosterveld,et al.  Managing technology alliances , 1988 .

[10]  Roy C. Herrenkohl,et al.  Factors affecting the transfer of technology from industry/university cooperatives to sponsoring companies , 1990 .

[11]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[12]  Robert A. Burgelman Managing innovating systems : a study of the process of internal corporate venturing , 1980 .

[13]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Inward Technology Licensing as an Alternative to Internal R&D in New Product Development: A Conceptual Framework , 1992 .

[14]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[15]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  R&D/marketing linkage and innovation strategy: some West German experience , 1988 .

[16]  A. H. Rubenstein,et al.  An exploration of factors affecting the integration of in-house R&D with external technology acquisition strategies of a firm , 1990 .

[17]  D. Mowery Economic theory and government technology policy , 1983 .

[18]  Christopher K. Bart,et al.  Organizing for New Product Development , 1988 .

[19]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  Transfer of indigenous technology--some indian cases , 1981 .

[20]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  A Typology of Industry—Government Laboratory Cooperative Research: Implications for Government Laboratory Policies and Competitiveness , 1989 .

[21]  E. C. Hodgman,et al.  A conceptual framework to guide nursing curriculum. , 1973, Nursing forum.

[22]  D. E. Blevins,et al.  Business and university technical research cooperation: Some important issues , 1986 .

[23]  David Ford,et al.  Make or buy—a key strategic issue , 1986 .

[24]  Jinjoo Lee,et al.  The impact of research sponsorship upon research effectiveness , 1991 .

[25]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[26]  A. H. Rubenstein,et al.  External technology and in-house R&D's facilitative role , 1989 .

[27]  Zong-Tae Bae,et al.  Performance and Adaptive Roles of the Government-supported Research Institute in South Korea , 1991 .

[28]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  An analysis of factors influencing the utilization of contract research in a developing country, Korea , 1980 .

[29]  John A. Alic,et al.  Cooperation in RD , 1990 .

[30]  A. Link,et al.  THE INDUCE VERSUS PURCHASE DECISION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL R&D* , 1983 .

[31]  A. W. Pearson,et al.  Licensing as an alternative to foreign direct investment an empirical investigation , 1988 .

[32]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .