Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach

This paper describes a collaborative action research approach used to explore peer observation of teaching (POT) within the online environment. Although POT has become familiar in face-to-face teaching contexts, little is understood of its potential role in online settings. We conducted 'virtual' focus groups to explore the experience and views of 28 teachers and subjected our data to a thematic analysis. This informed the implementation of an innovative programme of POT, 'Peer-to-peer Reflection on Pedagogical Practice' (PROPP) among tutors of a Web-based MSc in International Primary Health Care at University College London. Modeled on an action learning set, the programme encourages collaborative reflection on teaching practices, based on participants' specific examples of online teaching. The PROPP model is consistent with Quality Enhancement, which we distinguish from Quality Assurance. Here, we describe the implementation of the PROPP programme within an action research framework and identify the factors that we consider critical to the success of peer observation within online courses. We highlight examples of aspects of teaching that have been discussed within the PROPP programme and offer suggestions of the kinds of evidence that could be incorporated into a portfolio to demonstrate the effectiveness of such an initiative.

[1]  Wolfgang Greiner,et al.  Health Technology Assessment (HTA) , 2008 .

[2]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  A ‘How‐To’ Guide and Checklist for Peer Appraisal of Teaching , 1998 .

[3]  Elizabeth Murphy.  Moving from theory to practice in the design of web-based learning from the perspective of Constructivism , 2003 .

[4]  Chris Watkins,et al.  Feedback between teachers , 2000 .

[5]  R M Pitkin,et al.  The peer-review system. , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  J. Warren,et al.  Issues in data generation using email group conversations for nursing research. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  Jane Frankland,et al.  Virtual Focus Groups , 2001 .

[8]  Susan Askew.  Learning about teaching through reflective, collaborative enquiry and observation , 2004 .

[9]  J. Gabbay,et al.  Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[10]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[11]  A. Kenny.  Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  Hazel Fullerton,et al.  Observation of Teaching , 2003 .

[13]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[15]  Jill Cosh,et al.  Peer Observation in Higher Education ‐‐ A Reflective Approach , 1998 .

[16]  J. Emanuel,et al.  Action Research for Health and Social Care: a guide to practice , 1997 .

[17]  S. Kemmis,et al.  Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research , 1986 .

[18]  David Gosling.  Guidelines for peer observation of learning and teaching , 2000 .

[19]  Maureen Bell,et al.  Supported reflective practice: a programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development , 2001 .