Measuring boundary-layer height under clear and cloudy conditions using three instruments

Abstract Boundary-layer height (BLH) under clear, altostratus and low stratus cloud conditions were measured by GPS sounding, wind profiler radar, and micro-pulse lidar during the atmospheric radiation measurement experiment from Sep. to Dec. 2008 in Shouxian, Anhui, China. Results showed that during daytime or nighttime, regardless of cloud conditions, the GPS sounding was the most accurate method for measuring BLH. Unfortunately, because of the long time gap between launchings, sounding data did not capture the diurnal evolution of the BLH. Thus, wind profile radar emerged as a promising instrument for direct and continuous measurement of the mixing height during the daytime, accurately determining BLH using the structure parameter of the electromagnetic refractive index. However, during nighttime, radar was limited by weak signal extraction and did not work well for determining the BLH of the stable boundary layer, often recording the BLH of the residual layer. While micro-pulse lidar recorded the evolution of BLH, it overestimated the BLH of the stable boundary layer. This method also failed to work under cloudy conditions because of the influence of water vapor. Future work needs to develop a method to determine BLH that combines the complimentary features of all three algorithms.

[1]  Allen B. White,et al.  Boundary-layer depth and entrainment zone characterization with a boundary-layer profiler , 1994 .

[2]  R. Stull.  An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[3]  Jean-Pierre Wolf,et al.  Use of lidar measurements and numerical models in air pollution research , 1990 .

[4]  Timothy Martin,et al.  The daytime mixing layer observed by radiosonde, profiler, and lidar during MILAGRO , 2007 .

[5]  C. Fairall,et al.  Radar Observations of Humidity Variability in and above the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1991 .

[6]  George C. Holzworth,et al.  Mixing Depths, Wind Speeds and Air Pollution Potential for Selected Locations in the United States , 1967 .

[7]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height , 2000 .

[8]  Lindsay J. Bennett,et al.  Observations of the Evolution of the Nocturnal and Convective Boundary Layers and the Structure of Open-Celled Convection on 14 June 2002 , 2010 .

[9]  J. Parikh,et al.  Systematic tracking of boundary layer aerosols with laser radar , 2002 .

[10]  A. Delany,et al.  The Flatland Boundary Layer Experiments , 1998 .

[11]  F. Fehsenfeld,et al.  Wind profiler mixing depth and entrainment measurements with chemical applications , 1994 .

[12]  George C. Holzworth,et al.  ESTIMATES OF MEAN MAXIMUM MIXING DEPTHS IN THE CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES , 1964 .

[13]  C. Bhumralkar,et al.  Parameterization of the Planetary Boundary Layer in Atmospheric General Circulation Models - A Review , 1975 .

[14]  C. Flamant,et al.  Urban boundary-layer height determination from lidar measurements over the paris area. , 1999, Applied optics.

[15]  C. Flamant,et al.  LIDAR DETERMINATION OF THE ENTRAINMENT ZONE THICKNESS AT THE TOP OF THE UNSTABLE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER , 1997 .

[16]  Martin Gallagher,et al.  Boundary layer dynamics over London, UK, as observed using Doppler lidar during REPARTEE-II , 2011 .

[17]  Jens Bange,et al.  Determination of boundary-layer parameters using wind profiler/RASS and sodar/RASS in the frame of the LITFASS project , 2002 .

[18]  R. L. Coulter,et al.  Micropulse lidar‐derived aerosol optical depth climatology at ARM sites worldwide , 2013 .

[19]  David D. Turner,et al.  Full-Time, Eye-Safe Cloud and Aerosol Lidar Observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Sites: Instruments and Data Analysis , 2013 .