A Rigorous Semantics for BPMN 2.0 Process Diagrams

This book provides the most complete formal specification of the semantics of the Business Process Model and Notation 2.0 standard (BPMN) available to date, in a style that is easily understandable for a wide range of readers not only for experts in formal methods, but e.g. also for developers of modeling tools, software architects, or graduate students specializing in business process management. BPMN issued by the Object Management Group is a widely used standard for business process modeling. However, major drawbacks of BPMN include its limited support for organizational modeling, its only implicit expression of modalities, and its lack of integrated user interaction and data modeling. Further, in many cases the syntactical and, in particular, semantic definitions of BPMN are inaccurate, incomplete or inconsistent. The book addresses concrete issues concerning the execution semantics of business processes and provides a formal definition of BPMN process diagrams, which can serve as a sound basis for further extensions, i.e., in the form of horizontal refinements of the core language. To this end, the Abstract State Machine (ASMs) method is used to formalize the semantics of BPMN. ASMs have demonstrated their value in various domains, e.g. specifying the semantics of programming or modeling languages, verifying the specification of the Java Virtual Machine, or formalizing the ITIL change management process. This kind of improvement promotes more consistency in the interpretation of comprehensive models, as well as real exchangeability of models between different tools. In the outlook at the end of the book, the authors conclude with proposing extensions that address actor modeling (including an intuitive way to denote permissions and obligations), integration of user-centric views, a refined communication concept, and data integration.

[1]  Suzanne M. Ward Books on Demand , 2002 .

[2]  Kees M. van Hee,et al.  History-Based Joins: Semantics, Soundness and Implementation , 2006, Business Process Management.

[3]  Ekkart Kindler,et al.  On the Semantics of EPCs: A Framework for Resolving the Vicious Circle , 2004, Business Process Management.

[4]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Handbook of Conceptual Modeling - Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges , 2011 .

[5]  Verena Geist,et al.  A layered approach for actor modelling in business processes , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[6]  Verena Geist,et al.  Event-Based Gateways: Open Questions and Inconsistencies , 2012, BPMN.

[7]  Stephen A. White,et al.  BPMN modeling and reference guide : understanding and using BPMN : develop rigorous yet understandable graphical representations of business processes , 2008 .

[8]  Bruce Silver,et al.  Bpmn Method And Style , 2009 .

[9]  Egon Börger,et al.  BPMN Core Modeling Concepts: Inheritance-Based Execution Semantics , 2011, Handbook of Conceptual Modeling.

[10]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Process instantiation , 2009, Data Knowl. Eng..

[11]  Jakob Freund,et al.  Praxishandbuch BPMN 2.0 , 2010 .

[12]  Jan Recker,et al.  Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN , 2010, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[13]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  A Method for Verifiable and Validatable Business Process Modeling , 2007, Lipari Summer School.

[14]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  On Defining the Behavior of OR-joins in Business Process Models , 2009, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Egon Börger,et al.  Abstract State Machines. A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis , 2003 .

[16]  Moe Thandar Wynn,et al.  Verifying Workflows with Cancellation Regions and OR-Joins: An Approach Based on Reset Nets and Reachability Analysis , 2006, Business Process Management.

[17]  Christine Natschläger,et al.  Towards a BPMN 2.0 Ontology , 2011, BPMN.

[18]  Moe Thandar Wynn Semantics, verification, and implementation of workflows with cancellation regions and OR-joins , 2006 .