Socio-economic background and computer use: the role of computer anxiety and computer experience in their relationship

The proposition that socio-economic background relates to amount of current computer use indirectly, via its relationship with computer experience and computer anxiety, was tested with questionnaire data from a sample of 267 university students. The results supported the proposition, as they indicated a causal path model that contained a positive indirect relationship of socio-economic background with the amount of current computer use, via computer experience and computer anxiety. Socio-economic background had a direct positive relationship with computer experience and an indirect negative relationship with computer anxiety. The pattern of relationships was held over and above the variance accounted for by the set of control variables that included, among others, computer access and sex. The findings are supportive of the digital divide and they imply that information technology may in fact be increasing inequalities among social strata in their access to employment opportunities. The limitations of the study along with potential directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Effects of Marriage and a Working Wife on Occupational and Wage Attainment. , 1982 .

[2]  J. Webster,et al.  The Use of Technologies in the Recruiting, Screening, and Selection Processes for Job Candidates , 2003 .

[3]  R. Hudiburg,et al.  Relating Computer-Associated Stress to Computerphobia , 1990, Psychological reports.

[4]  Gordon W. Waugh,et al.  Assessing Computer Anxiety , 1989, Psychological reports.

[5]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[6]  Alexander Alonso,et al.  In with the New, Out with the Old: Has the Technological Revolution Eliminated the Traditional Job Search Process? , 2003 .

[7]  Thomas W. Dougherty,et al.  Generalizability of MBA degree and socioeconomic effects on business school graduates' salaries. , 1985 .

[8]  M. Brosnan.  Modeling technophobia: a case for word processing , 1999 .

[9]  R. Darin Ellis,et al.  Modeling Computer Interest in Older Adults: The Role of Age, Education, Computer Knowledge, and Computer Anxiety , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Treating technophobia: A longitudinal evaluation of the computerphobia reduction program , 1993 .

[11]  A. Anderson.  Predictors of Computer Anxiety and Performance in Information Systems , 1996 .

[12]  Jeffrey N. Browndyke,et al.  Computer-Related Anxiety: Examining the Impact of Technology-Specific Affect on the Performance of a Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment Measure , 2002, Applied neuropsychology.

[13]  Christa Reiser,et al.  Social stratification and the digital divide , 2003 .

[14]  J. Davis.  The Logic Of Causal Order , 1987 .

[15]  F. Hartwig,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2008, Using Science in Cybersecurity.

[16]  Gil Choi,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Social Workers: Differences by Access, Use, and Training , 2002 .

[17]  Chester C. Cotton.  Social Class as a Neglected Variable in Organizational Behavior , 1994 .

[18]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[19]  George N. Gordon.  The End of an Era in American Education , 1972 .

[20]  D. R. Heise.  Problems in Path Analysis and Causal Inference , 1969 .

[21]  Mark J. Brosnan,et al.  The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[22]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Development and Validation of a Measure of Computer Anxiety. , 1984 .

[23]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Computer experience and computer anxiety , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Rosemary E. Sutton.  Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research , 1991 .

[27]  Robin Kay,et al.  Predicting Student Teacher Commitment to the Use of Computers , 1990 .

[28]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The etiology of computerphobia , 1990 .

[29]  Tuvia Melamed,et al.  Validation of a Stage Model of Career Success , 1996 .

[30]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[31]  David A. Specht,et al.  On the evaluation of causal models , 1975 .

[32]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[33]  Richard J. Murnane,et al.  Teaching The New Basic Skills , 1996 .

[34]  Nikos Bozionelos,et al.  Causal path modeling: what it does and what it does not tell us , 2003 .

[35]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[36]  P. Okebukola,et al.  The gender factor in computer anxiety and interest among some Australian high school students , 1993 .

[37]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer Attitudes: An Investigation of Construct and Predictive Validity Issues , 1990 .

[38]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  J. Wagner,et al.  Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and Effect , 1994 .

[40]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Computer Anxiety in College Students , 1990 .

[41]  D. Berridge,et al.  Young People's Entry into Higher Education: Quantifying influential factors , 2002 .

[42]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Home Computers and School Performance , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[43]  Faith D. Gilroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety: Sex, Race and Age , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[44]  Mark A. Shields,et al.  Lost in Cyberspace? , 1996 .

[45]  Douglas A. Henderson,et al.  Stepwise Regression in Social and Psychological Research , 1989 .

[46]  Kevin Tierney,et al.  The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  S. Anderson,et al.  Technophobia and Personality Subtypes in a Sample of South African University Students , 2000 .

[48]  A. Murrell,et al.  The impact of negative attitudes toward computers on employees' satisfaction and commitment within a small company , 1993 .

[49]  Clive Payne,et al.  The Analysis of survey data , 1977 .

[50]  D. Mahar,et al.  Construct validity of computer anxiety as measured by the Computer Attitudes Scale , 1995 .

[51]  Nikos Bozionelos,et al.  Computer anxiety: relationship with computer experience and prevalence , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[53]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User acceptance of information technology , 2001 .

[54]  W. Whitely,et al.  The Relationship of Career Mentoring to Early Career Outcomes , 1993 .

[55]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Effects of an MBA and socioeconomic origins on business school graduates' salaries. , 1977 .

[56]  Matthew M. Maurer,et al.  Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: A literature review , 1994 .

[57]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective , 1995 .

[58]  LookerE. Dianne,et al.  Beyond the digital divide in Canadian schools , 2003 .

[59]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[60]  N. Schmitt.  Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement , 1994 .

[61]  William D. Berry.  Nonrecursive Causal Models , 1984 .

[62]  N. Bozionelos.  The relationship of instrumental and expressive traits with computer anxiety , 2001 .

[63]  Marjorie A. Cambre,et al.  Measurement and Remediation of Computer Anxiety. , 1987 .

[64]  Victor Thiessen,et al.  Beyond the Digital Divide in Canadian Schools , 2003 .

[65]  M. Egerton,et al.  Monitoring contemporary student flows and characteristics: secondary analyses using the Labour Force Survey and the General Household Survey , 2000 .

[66]  P. C. Chu,et al.  Validating the computer anxiety rating scale: Effects of cognitive style and computer courses on computer anxiety , 1991 .

[67]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[68]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[69]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Doug Mahar,et al.  The effects of computer anxiety, state anxiety, and computer experience on users' performance of computer based tasks , 1997 .

[71]  A. Raub.  CORRELATES OF COMPUTER ANXIETY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1981 .

[72]  Eric Riedel,et al.  Electronic Communities , 1998 .

[73]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Introduction to Structural Equation Models. , 1977 .

[74]  William D. Berry,et al.  Multiple regression in practice , 1985 .

[75]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Computer Availability, Computer Experience and Technophobia Among Public School Teachers , 1995 .

[76]  Heidi Julien,et al.  Source Selection among Information Seekers: Ideals and Realities. , 2013 .