Development of a Team-Based Method for Assuring the Quality of Assistive Technology Documentation

Good practice in assistive technology (AT) service delivery targeting children with disabilities has come increasingly to include providing AT stakeholders with a final text record that documents the rationale and procedures behind the recommendations made during the AT assessment process (AT documentation). In the present case study of one AT service provider, we developed a team-based approach for conducting an evaluation of the quality of the AT documentation. A service-specific scale for the evaluation of AT documentation was developed following a five-step approach. The scale was employed to review AT documentation utilizing specific review criteria in order to evaluate the quality of AT documentation practices with regard to the service investigated. Two independent reviewers examined the AT documentation for 130 cases of AT service provision. Weighted kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were employed as a measure of inter-rater agreement. The results of the documentation evaluation allowed AT professionals to objectively assess the quality of the AT documentation produced by the service under investigation, identify shortcomings in the documentation process, and make related corrections. AT services may benefit from the employment of strategic approaches for the evaluation of service provision. Possible applications to other AT service providers are discussed.

[1]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health measurement scales , 2008 .

[3]  Michael L Boninger,et al.  A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  Diana Sale An introduction to quality assurance , 1990 .

[6]  Michelle Brasure,et al.  Wheeled Mobility (Wheelchair) Service Delivery: Scope of the Evidence , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[8]  Renzo Andrich,et al.  IPPA: Individually Prioritised Problem Assessment , 2002 .

[9]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  Treatment Theory, Intervention Specification, and Treatment Fidelity in Assistive Technology Outcomes Research , 2010, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[10]  Albert M. Cook,et al.  Essentials of Assistive Technologies , 2012 .

[11]  E. Manias,et al.  The role of documents and documentation in communication failure across the perioperative pathway. A literature review. , 2011, International journal of nursing studies.

[12]  K. Cullen,et al.  Research on the provision of Assistive Technology in Ireland and other countries to support independent living across the life cycle , 2012 .

[13]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Jacquie Ripat,et al.  Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: stakeholder perspectives and preferences , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  Lauren E Rosen,et al.  RESNA Wheelchair Service Provision Guide. , 2011 .

[16]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. , 2002 .

[17]  Renzo Andrich Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: A position paper , 2013 .

[18]  Gerald Craddock,et al.  Delivering an AT service: a client-focused, social and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[20]  J. Jutai,et al.  A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs) , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[21]  Lorenzo Desideri,et al.  Assessing children with multiple disabilities for assistive technology: A framework for quality assurance , 2013 .

[22]  L. Desideri,et al.  Recommending assistive technology (AT) for children with multiple disabilities: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of models and instruments for AT professionals , 2013 .

[23]  Stephen M Bauer,et al.  Provision of assistive technology services method (ATSM) according to evidence-based information and knowledge management , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  Sigrid Østensjø Assistive Devices for Children with Disabilities , 2009 .

[25]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  R Weiss-Lambrou,et al.  Item Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) , 2000, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[27]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  Classification of assistive technology services: Implications for outcomes research , 2012 .