Developing a Rapid Seismic Performance based Rating System in Safety Assessment of Buildings

Author(s): Esmaili, Omid | Advisor(s): Zareian, Farzin; Grant Ludwig, Lisa | Abstract: This dissertation is a collection of research studies that address challenges in Performance-based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE) and provides solutions to issues of concern to practicing engineers, researchers, city planners, and the insurance industry alike in implementation of PBEE for building structures. Contributions made within this research are four fold: i) An applied solution is provided to reduce the number of ground motion records required to reliably estimating Intensity Measure-Engineering Demand Parameters (IM-EDP) relationship used for building loss estimation. This solution employs classical linear modal analysis to develop a first estimate (i.e. a priori) of IM-EDP relationships, followed by utilizing Bayesian statistics to update these estimates using a small number of nonlinear response history analyses of a detailed model of the building (i.e., posterior). ii) An applied hazard based Regional Seismic Loss Assessment (RSLA) method for buildings is formulated. In contrast to previous research in this field, the proposed RSLA method utilizes a regional rapid seismic hazard disaggregation tool and is computationally efficient and sufficient. iii) A new seismic design methodology is formulized and presented. A set of preliminary Performance-based Seismic Design (PPBSD) tools are developed for four-story reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame (RC-SMRF) office buildings, located in Los Angeles at 475 year ground motion return period by which stakeholders can make informed decisions with regards to the potential risk they may adopt against future earthquakes. iv) An earthquake loss rating system is provided that maps a building's seismic performance to a rating value/index. This outcome can transfer seismic risk metrics to non-engineers in an effective communicative way.

[1]  Laura N. Lowes,et al.  Evaluation, calibration, and verification of a reinforced concrete beam-column joint model , 2007 .

[2]  J. Moehle,et al.  SHEAR STRENGTH MODEL FOR LIGHTLY REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS , 2004 .

[3]  Farzin Zareian,et al.  Decision support for conceptual performance‐based design , 2006 .

[4]  E. Miranda,et al.  Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2004 .

[5]  Thomas H. Heaton Northridge 20 Years After , 2014 .

[6]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probabilistic Response Assessment for Building-Specific Loss Estimation , 2003 .

[7]  L. Ibarra Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations , 2003 .

[8]  Judith Mitrani-Reiser,et al.  AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION: PROBABILISTIC LOSS ESTIMATION FOR PERFORMANCE - BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING , 2007 .

[9]  J. Baker,et al.  A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon , 2005 .

[10]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  3D GROUND MOTION SIMULATION IN BASINS , 2005 .

[11]  Abbie B. Liel,et al.  The effect of near‐fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk , 2012 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Elwood,et al.  Seismic loss estimation of non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings , 2013 .

[13]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[14]  Thalia Anagnos,et al.  Development of a National Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology , 1997 .

[15]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  A Computationally Efficient Ground-Motion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance , 2011 .

[16]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings , 2010 .

[17]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Damage Scenarios Simulation for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Zones , 1996 .

[18]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 2005 .

[19]  Kenneth J. Elwood,et al.  Modelling failures in existing reinforced concrete columns , 2004 .

[20]  Carlos Marcelo Ramirez Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering , 2009 .

[21]  Keith Porter,et al.  An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .

[22]  William A. Bryant,et al.  A Site-Conditions Map for California Based on Geology and Shear-Wave Velocity , 2000 .

[23]  B. John Garrick,et al.  Recent Case Studies and Advancements in Probabilistic Risk Assessment , 1984 .

[24]  L. Lowes,et al.  Modeling Reinforced-Concrete Beam-Column Joints Subjected to Cyclic Loading , 2003 .

[25]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations , 2008 .

[26]  Farzin Zareian,et al.  Sensitivity of Collapse Potential of Buildings to Variations in Structural Systems and Structural Parameters , 2007 .

[27]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[28]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Accuracy of approximate methods of uncertainty propagation in seismic loss estimation , 2010 .

[29]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  An Assessment to Benchmark the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced-Concrete Moment-Frame Building , 2008 .

[30]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology To Performance-Based Engineering , 2020 .