A technology opportunities analysis model: applied to dye-sensitised solar cells for China

Technology opportunities analysis (TOA) can support policy-makers or managers in making strategic technical decisions so as to enhance their technological innovation capability and international competitiveness. This paper presents a multi-level framework to support and systematically identify technological opportunities. Patent data as a key component of technology innovation are used to enable TOA within the framework in the present research. At the research and development (R&D) level, we anticipate the directions of technology development based on technology morphology. Countries’ development emphases can also be investigated in order to help identify their R&D strengths and weaknesses and to seek promising development pathways. At the level of competition, we devise the assignee-technology analysis to obtain insight into competitive participants’ technical emphases and intents. It is also used to explore possible collaboration opportunities among them. At the market level, we apply patent family analysis to understand countries’ target markets and to assess prospects for the commercialisation of their technology. We pursue TOA to explore China's opportunities and challenges in dye-sensitised solar cells. The empirical case analysis supports the effectiveness of the TOA model. We believe it can be adapted well to fit other emerging technologies.

[1]  M. Grätzel,et al.  A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films , 1991, Nature.

[2]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Identifying Technology Commercialization Opportunities: The Importance of Integrating Product Development Knowledge , 2012 .

[4]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[5]  M. Nieto,et al.  Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort , 2005 .

[6]  Catalina Martínez,et al.  Patent families: When do different definitions really matter? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[7]  Johan G. Wissema,et al.  Morphological analysis: Its application to a company TF investigation , 1976 .

[8]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting , 2002 .

[9]  Giovanna Vertova,et al.  National technological specialisation and the highest technological opportunities historically , 2001 .

[10]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Text mining of information resources to inform Forecasting Innovation Pathways , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[11]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  An Inductive Method for “Term Clumping”: A Case Study on Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells , 2012 .

[12]  SU Jing-qin.  Visualization identify of technology innovation opportunities:empirical analysis based on patent bibliometric , 2008 .

[13]  J. Youtie,et al.  Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .

[14]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Metal Oxides for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells , 2009 .

[15]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Detecting signals of new technological opportunities using semantic patent analysis and outlier detection , 2011, Scientometrics.

[16]  B.C. Yoon,et al.  Morphology analysis approach for technology forecasting , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[17]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  Recent advances in sensitized mesoscopic solar cells. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[18]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis , 2005 .

[19]  A. Nagata,et al.  Determinant Factors of Innovation in Japan's Chemical Industry: Analysis of Its Technological Opportunities , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[20]  Anthony F. Breitzman,et al.  Technological Powerhouse or Diluted Competence: Techniques for Assessing Mergers Via Patent Analysis , 2002 .

[21]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[22]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Role of Technical Literature in Science and Technology Development and Exploitation , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting and Management of Technology , 1991 .

[24]  Darrell L. Mann,et al.  Better technology forecasting using systematic innovation methods , 2003 .

[25]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  Using patent data for technology forecasting: China RFID patent analysis , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[26]  Marisela Rodríguez Salvador,et al.  Technology mapping, business strategy, and market opportunities , 2000 .

[27]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  Innovation Effects of Science-Related Technological Opportunities / Innovationseffekte von technologischen Möglichkeiten aus dem Wissenschaftsbereich , 2002 .

[28]  Yongtae Park,et al.  On the Development and Application of a Self-Organizing Feature Map-Based Patent Map , 2002 .

[29]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A process for mining science & technology documents databases, illustrated for the case of "knowledge discovery and data mining" , 1999 .

[30]  Darrell Mann,et al.  Hands-on systematic innovation , 2002 .

[31]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[32]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  On the development of a technology intelligence tool for identifying technology opportunity , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Technology opportunities analysis , 1995 .