Numerical investigation on the ram–scram transition mechanism in a strut-based dual-mode scramjet combustor

Abstract The ramjet and scramjet modes can be realized in the same flowpath using the thermal choking approach, and the dual-mode scramjet combustor has attracted an increasing attention. The ram-to-scram mode transition mechanism in a strut-based dual-mode scramjet combustor has been evaluated numerically, and the influences of the inlet boundary conditions at the entrance of the isolator, the injection strategy and the jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio on the mode transition have been investigated. At the same time, the numerical approach has been validated through a turbulent diffusion combustion problem, as well as the effectiveness of the hydrogen-air chemical reaction mechanism. The obtained results show that the inlet boundary conditions at the entrance of the isolator and the jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio both have a large impact on the ram-to-scram mode transition, and the flow upstream of the strut is subsonic when the jet-to-crossflow pressure is large enough, namely 10.0 and 15.0 in the current study. The thermal choking point first appears at the leading edge of the strut, namely nearly at x  = 0.25 m. The low freestream Mach number is beneficial for the ramjet mode operation, and the engine would convert into the scramjet mode with the increase of the flight velocity of the vehicle. The influence of the injection strategy employed in this paper can be neglected, and the Mach number distribution upstream of the leading edge of the strut has not been disturbed.

[1]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Influences of H2O mass fraction and chemical kinetics mechanism on the turbulent diffusion combustion of H2–O2 in supersonic flows , 2012 .

[2]  Zhang Yan,et al.  Influencing factors on the mode transition in a dual-mode scramjet , 2014 .

[3]  Wei Huang,et al.  Design exploration of three-dimensional transverse jet in a supersonic crossflow based on data mining and multi-objective design optimization approaches , 2014 .

[4]  Jun Liu,et al.  Effect of cavity location on combustion flow field of integrated hypersonic vehicle in near space , 2011, J. Vis..

[6]  Ye Tian,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations of combustion mode transition in a direct–connect scramjet combustor , 2015 .

[7]  E. Erdem,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of transverse injection flows , 2010 .

[8]  G. Sullins Demonstration of mode transition in a scramjet combustor , 1993 .

[9]  C. J. Jachimowski,et al.  An analytical study of the hydrogen-air reaction mechanism with application to scramjet combustion , 1988 .

[10]  Wen Bao,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of Combustion Mode Transitions in a Strut-Based Scramjet Combustor Model , 2013 .

[11]  Wei Huang,et al.  Parametric effects on the combustion flow field of a typical strut-based scramjet combustor , 2011 .

[12]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Performance of a Dual-Mode Combustor with Multistaged Fuel Injection , 2006 .

[13]  O. Dessornes,et al.  Tests of the JAPHAR dual mode ramjet engine , 2005 .

[14]  Michael Oevermann,et al.  Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling , 2000 .

[15]  Li Yan,et al.  Survey on the mode transition technique in combined cycle propulsion systems , 2014 .

[16]  Christopher P. Goyne,et al.  Experimental Study of Test-Medium Vitiation Effects on Dual-Mode Scramjet Performance , 2011 .

[18]  Wei Huang,et al.  Influence of jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio on nonreacting and reacting processes in a scramjet combustor with backward-facing steps , 2014 .

[19]  Anatole P. Kurkov,et al.  An Analytical and Experimental Study of Supersonic Combustion of Hydrogen in Vitiated Air Stream , 1973 .

[20]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[21]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  New Method for Computing Performance of Choked Reacting Flows and Ram-to-Scram Transition , 2013 .

[22]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Mode Change Characteristics of a Three-Dimensional Scramjet at Mach 8 , 2013 .

[23]  Daren Yu,et al.  Analysis of combustion mode and operating route for hydrogen fueled scramjet engine , 2013 .

[24]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows , 2012 .

[25]  Jing Lei,et al.  Numerical investigation on the shock wave transition in a three-dimensional scramjet isolator , 2011 .

[26]  Lin Ma,et al.  Flow-Field Analysis of a Typical Hydrogen-Fueled Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor , 2012 .

[27]  Corin Segal,et al.  The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics , 2009 .

[28]  Christopher P. Goyne,et al.  Test Gas Vitiation Effects in a Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor , 2007 .

[29]  Min Liu,et al.  A novel vibration isolation system for reaction wheel on space telescopes , 2014 .

[30]  R. Saravanan,et al.  Investigation of Supersonic Jet Interaction With Hypersonic Cross Flow , 2015 .

[31]  Richard J. Weber,et al.  An Analysis of Ramjet Engines Using Supersonic Combustion , 1958 .

[32]  Matthew Fotia,et al.  Ram-Scram Transition and Flame/Shock-Train Interactions in a Model Scramjet Experiment , 2013 .

[33]  Daren Yu,et al.  Hysteresis Phenomenon of Mode Transition in Ramjet Engines and Its Topological Rules , 2012 .

[34]  Li Yan,et al.  Performance evaluation and parametric analysis on cantilevered ramp injector in supersonic flows , 2013 .