LiDAR-Based Classification of Sagebrush Community Types

Abstract Sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) communities constitute the largest temperate semidesert in North America and provide important rangelands for livestock and habitat for wildlife. Remote sensing methods might provide an efficient method to monitor sagebrush communities. This study used airborne LiDAR and field data to measure vegetation heights in five different community types at the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, southwestern Idaho: herbaceous-dominated, low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula) –dominated, big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp.) –dominated, bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) -dominated, and other vegetation community types. The objectives were 1) to quantify the correlation between field-measured and airborne LiDAR-derived shrub heights, and 2) to determine if airborne LiDAR-derived mean vegetation heights can be used to classify the five community types. The dominant vegetation type and vegetation heights were measured in 3 × 3 m field plots. The LiDAR point cloud data were converted into a raster format to generate a maximum vegetation height map in 3-m raster cells. The regression relationship between field-based and airborne LiDAR-derived shrub heights was significant (R2  =  0.77; P value < 0.001). An analysis of variance test with all pairwise post hoc comparisons indicated that LiDAR-derived vegetation heights were significantly different among all vegetation community types (all P values < 0.01), except for herbaceous-dominated communities compared to low sagebrush-dominated communities. Although LiDAR measurements consistently underestimated vegetation heights in all community types, shrub heights at some locations were overestimated due to adjacent taller vegetation. We recommend for future studies a smaller rasterized pixel size that is consistent with the target vegetation canopy diameter.

[1]  R. Clark,et al.  Mapping vegetation in Yellowstone National Park using spectral feature analysis of AVIRIS data , 2003 .

[2]  Jerry C. Ritchie,et al.  Laser altimeter measurements at Walnut Gulch Watershed, Arizona , 1995 .

[3]  Steven T. Knick,et al.  Supervised classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery in a semi-arid rangeland by nonparametric discriminant analysis , 1997 .

[4]  Paul T. Tueller,et al.  Remote sensing technology for rangeland management applications. , 1989 .

[5]  D. Roberts,et al.  Practical limits on hyperspectral vegetation discrimination in arid and semiarid environments , 2001 .

[6]  Jerry C. Ritchie,et al.  Comparison of laser and field measurements of vegetation height and canopy cover , 1994 .

[7]  Keith T. Weber,et al.  Challenges of Integrating Geospatial Technologies Into Rangeland Research and Management , 2006 .

[8]  S. Ustin,et al.  Estimation of shrub height for fuel-type mapping combining airborne LiDAR and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging , 2007 .

[9]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Model Evaluation by Comparison of Model-Based Predictions and Measured Values , 2003 .

[10]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Morphological characteristics of shrub coppice dunes in desert grasslands of southern New Mexico derived from scanning LIDAR. , 2000 .

[11]  D. Debinski,et al.  Spectral and biophysical relationships of montane sagebrush communities in multi-temporal SPOT XS data , 2001 .

[12]  E. C. Nord.  Autecology of Bitterbrush in California , 1965 .

[13]  E. Bork,et al.  Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis , 2007 .

[14]  Steven D. Prager,et al.  Estimating sagebrush cover in semi-arid environments using Landsat Thematic Mapper data , 2009, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[15]  W. Baker.  Fire and Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems , 2006 .

[16]  C. Hopkinsona,et al.  Errors in LiDAR ground elevation and wetland vegetation height estimates , 2004 .

[17]  Jacob T. Mundt,et al.  Mapping Sagebrush Distribution Using Fusion of Hyperspectral and Lidar Classifications , 2006 .

[18]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Comparing local vs. global visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) calibrations for the prediction of soil clay, organic C and inorganic C , 2008 .

[19]  D. Terrance Booth,et al.  Characterizing rangeland vegetation using Landsat and 1-mm VLSA data in central Wyoming (USA) , 2008, Agroforestry Systems.

[20]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Community type differentiation using NOAA/AVHRR data within a sagebrush-steppe ecosystem , 1993 .

[21]  Jay E. Anderson,et al.  LANDSCAPE‐SCALE CHANGES IN PLANT SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A SAGEBRUSH STEPPE OVER 45 YEARS , 2001 .

[22]  Gerald N. Flerchinger,et al.  Thirty‐five years of research data collection at the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, United States , 2001 .

[23]  N. Glenn,et al.  LiDAR measurement of sagebrush steppe vegetation heights , 2006 .

[24]  R. D. Ramsey,et al.  A Protocol for Retrospective Remote Sensing–Based Ecological Monitoring of Rangelands , 2006 .

[25]  N. Glenn,et al.  Characterizing Western Juniper Expansion via a Fusion of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper and Lidar Data , 2010 .

[26]  Edward W. Bork,et al.  Characterization of diverse plant communities in Aspen Parkland rangeland using LiDAR data , 2007 .

[27]  C. Wambolt,et al.  Recovery of big sagebrush communities after burning in south-western Montana. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Keith T. Weber,et al.  Postfire Recovery of Sagebrush Communities: Assessment Using Spot-5 and Very Large-Scale Aerial Imagery , 2008 .

[29]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Applications and Research Using Remote Sensing for Rangeland Management , 2003 .

[30]  B Jacob,et al.  Geographic Database, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, United States , 2001 .

[31]  Myles J. Watts,et al.  Long-term recovery of Wyoming big sagebrush after four treatments , 1996 .

[32]  R. D. Ramsey,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Landsat 30m Enhanced Thematic Mapper to Monitor Vegetation Cover in Shrub‐Steppe Environments , 2004 .