Transition to Parenthood: The Role of Social Interaction and Endogenous Networks

Empirical studies indicate that the transition to parenthood is influenced by an individual’s peer group. To study the mechanisms creating interdependencies across individuals’ transition to parenthood and its timing, we apply an agent-based simulation model. We build a one-sex model and provide agents with three different characteristics: age, intended education, and parity. Agents endogenously form their network based on social closeness. Network members may then influence the agents’ transition to higher parity levels. Our numerical simulations indicate that accounting for social interactions can explain the shift of first-birth probabilities in Austria during the period 1984 to 2004. Moreover, we apply our model to forecast age-specific fertility rates up to 2016.

[1]  T. K. Burch,et al.  The Decline of Fertility in Europe. , 1989 .

[2]  A. Prskawetz,et al.  Do siblings’ fertility decisions influence each other? , 2010, Demography.

[3]  A. Prskawetz,et al.  External Shocks, Household Consumption and Fertility in Indonesia , 2010, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[4]  Francesco C. Billari,et al.  Agent based computational demography: using simulation to improve our understanding of demographic behaviour , 2003 .

[5]  Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt.  Haushalte und Familien , 1986 .

[6]  F. Schwarz.  The Contributions of Diseases to Increasing Educational Mortality Differential in Austria , 2021, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[7]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Social networks, support cliques, and kinship , 1995, Human nature.

[9]  H. Kohler.  Social interactions and fluctuations in birth rates , 2000 .

[10]  Wenji Mao,et al.  Social Learning , 2010, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  H. Kohler.  Fertility and Social Interaction: An Economic Perspective , 2001 .

[13]  L. Bernardi,et al.  Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction , 2003 .

[14]  G. Hernes,et al.  THE PROCESS OF ENTRY INTO FIRST MARRIAGE , 1972 .

[15]  Thomas Fent,et al.  An Agent-Based Simulation Model of Age-at-Marriage Norms , 2006 .

[16]  Derek Bosworth,et al.  An economic perspective , 2006 .

[17]  Andreas Flache,et al.  How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[18]  Holger von der Lippe,et al.  Social Influences on Fertility , 2007 .

[19]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Coexistence of Social Norms Based on in- and Out-Group Interactions , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[20]  Francesco C. Billari,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Demography , 2003 .

[21]  Susan Cotts Watkins,et al.  Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. , 1996 .

[22]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[23]  Harold L. Cole,et al.  Class systems and the enforcement of social norms 1 Original title: `Enforceability of social norms' , 1998 .

[24]  Thomas Fent,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Modelling: Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences , 2006 .

[25]  L. Bernardi,et al.  Social Influences on Fertility: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study in Eastern and Western Germany , 2007 .

[26]  Edmund Chattoe,et al.  The Role of Agent-Based Modelling in Demographic Explanation , 2003 .

[27]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[28]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[29]  B. D. Bruijn.  Foundations of Demographic Theory: Choice, Process, Context , 1999 .

[30]  F. Billari,et al.  Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001) , 2006, Population studies.

[31]  L. Toulemon,et al.  Gender Differences in the Transition to Adulthood in France: Is There Convergence Over the Recent Period? , 2007, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[32]  G. Feichtinger,et al.  On the age dynamics of learned societies-taking the example of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. , 2007, Vienna yearbook of population research.

[33]  M. Montgomery,et al.  The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. , 1993, Population studies.

[34]  Warren C. Sanderson,et al.  Knowledge can improve forecasts: a review of selected socioeconomic population projection models. , 1998 .

[35]  M. Mamolo.  Union Formation, Marriage and First Birth: Convergence Across Cohorts in Austria, Hungary, Northern Italy and Slovenia? , 2021, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[36]  S. Levin,et al.  The dynamics of political polarization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  R. Pollak,et al.  Cultural and Economic Approaches to Fertility : A Proper Marriage or a Mesalliance? , 1993 .

[38]  A. Hijzen,et al.  DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS , 2011 .

[39]  T. Lyngstad.  A Fixed- Effects Study of Twenty Norwegian First-Marriage Cohorts , 2021, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[40]  John Knodel,et al.  Lessons from the past: policy implications of historical fertility studies. , 1979 .

[41]  A. Thornton,et al.  Family influences on family size preferences , 1994, Demography.

[42]  A. Prskawetz,et al.  Second Births in Austria , 2005 .

[43]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  The Diffusion of Cohabitation among Young Women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy , 2003 .

[44]  A. Coale,et al.  The Decline of Fertility in Europe , 1986 .

[45]  K. Biehl,et al.  Vorausschätzungen für die Entwicklung der Gesamtbevölkerung und der Beschäftigung in Österreich bis 2035 , 2021, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[46]  Alberto Palloni,et al.  Theories and Models of Diffusion in Sociology , 2022 .

[47]  R. B. Mckersie,et al.  A Preliminary View , 1973 .

[48]  M E J Newman,et al.  Identity and Search in Social Networks , 2002, Science.

[49]  C. Wolf,et al.  Altern, Familie und soziales Netzwerk , 2001 .

[50]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Structural Theory of Social Influence: List of Tables and Figures , 1998 .

[51]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[52]  F. Billari,et al.  The Emergence of Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s , 2002 .

[53]  A. Prskawetz,et al.  Reconsidering the Relation between Fertility and Key Fertility-Related Demographic Behaviour across Space and Time , 2021, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[54]  S. Watkins.  The fertility transition: Europe and the Third World compared , 1987 .

[55]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[56]  L. Rosero-Bixby,et al.  Modelling Diffusion Effects in Fertility Transition , 1993 .

[57]  M. Hammer,et al.  Parenthood and social networks. A preliminary view. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[58]  M. Planck.  Kinship, Family and Social Network: The anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe , 2000 .

[59]  B. D. Bruijn.  Foundations of demographic theory , 1999 .

[60]  Thomas Fent,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Modelling , 2006 .

[61]  J. Hoem,et al.  Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research. Part 1: Education and first childbearing , 2006 .

[62]  G. Moore.  Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks , 1990 .

[63]  F. Schwarz.  Behavioral Explanation for Educational Health and Mortality Differentials in Austria , 2021, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[64]  J. Hoem,et al.  Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research. Part 1: the role of education in the study of first childbearing. , 2006 .

[65]  Barry Wellman,et al.  A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities☆ , 1997 .

[66]  Thomas K. Burch,et al.  Icons, Straw Men and Precision: Reflections on Demographic Theories of Fertility Decline , 1995 .

[67]  Maria Winkler-Dworak,et al.  The Low Mortality of a Learned Society , 2008, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[68]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[69]  H. Kohler.  Fertility and social interaction , 2001 .

[70]  R. Woods.  The Decline of Fertility in Europe , 1988 .

[71]  G. Micheli.  Kinship family and social network: the anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe. , 2000 .

[72]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[73]  F. Billari,et al.  Socio-economic differences in postponement and recuperation of fertility in Italy: results from a multi-spell random effect model , 2006 .

[74]  John Cleland,et al.  Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View , 1987 .

[75]  A. Goujon,et al.  Past and Future of Human Capital in Southeast Asia: From 1970 to 2030 , 2008, Institut für Demographie - VID.

[76]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[77]  Mary A. Burke,et al.  The Strength of Social Interactions and Obesity among Women , 2006 .

[78]  Johannes Fürnkranz,et al.  The cultural evolution of age-at-marriage norms , 2002 .

[79]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[80]  John B. Casterline,et al.  Social learning social influence and new models of fertility. , 1996 .

[81]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Social Networks , 2013, Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization.

[82]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..