Minimum stored energy MRI superconducting magnets: From low to high field

The aim of this article is to describe superconducting magnet coil arrangements from low to high field, particularly from 1T to 7T, within the context of the minimum stored energy designs. The findings illustrate that at low field, the maximum peak magnetic fields are located away from the most inner coils of the magnet configuration, whereas in high field designs, the maximum peak magnetic fields are created on coils lying on the inner diameter of the magnet bore. This becomes a critical aspect of any high field design, since there appears to be much less freedom of design at higher fields, due to the inherent limitations posed by peak magnetic fields on superconductors. Our findings also indicate that at low fields, 3T and less, reverse current coils can be used to shorten superconducting magnets, whereas at high field, above 3T, this is not necessarily the case, due to the large peak fields produced between adjacent, alternating current coils.

[1]  G. Morrow Progress in MRI magnets , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[2]  Viktor Vegh,et al.  Globally optimal superconducting magnets part II: symmetric MSE coil arrangement. , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[4]  S. V. Sciver,et al.  Superconducting Magnets Above 20 Tesla , 2002 .

[5]  M.A. Green,et al.  The Cost of Superconducting Magnets as a Function of Stored Energy and Design Magnetic Induction Times the Field Volume , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[6]  Atsushi Ishiyama,et al.  Magnetic shielding for MRI superconducting magnets , 1991 .

[7]  Simple design guidelines for short MRI systems , 2005 .

[8]  V. C. Srivastava,et al.  An inverse approach to the design of MRI main magnets , 1994 .

[9]  Richard E. Ansorge,et al.  Genetic algorithms for MRI magnet design , 2002 .

[10]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Analytic solutions for axisymmetric magnetostatic systems involving iron , 1987 .

[11]  Viktor Vegh,et al.  Globally optimal superconducting magnets part I: minimum stored energy (MSE) current density map. , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[12]  S Crozier,et al.  Compact clinical MRI magnet design using a multi‐layer current density approach , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  S Crozier,et al.  A hybrid, inverse approach to the design of magnetic resonance imaging magnets. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  A design method for superconducting MRI magnets with ferromagnetic material , 2002 .

[15]  R.W. Brown,et al.  A comparison of two design methods for MRI magnets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[16]  A. Formisano,et al.  A genetic algorithm approach to the design of split coil magnets for MRI , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[17]  A. K. Kalafala A design approach for actively shielded magnetic resonance imaging magnets , 1990 .

[18]  A. K. Kalafala Optimized configurations for passively shielded magnetic resonance imaging magnets , 1991 .

[19]  S Crozier,et al.  Compact MRI magnet design by stochastic optimization. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[20]  V. Vegh,et al.  Minimum Stored Energy High-Field MRI Superconducting Magnets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[21]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Design of actively shielded main magnets: an improved functional method , 2003, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.