Verification tests in solid mechanics

Code verification against analytical solutions is a prerequisite to code validation against experimental data. Though solid-mechanics codes have established basic verification standards such as patch tests and convergence tests, few (if any) similar standards exist for testing solid-mechanics constitutive models under nontrivial massive deformations. Increasingly complicated verification tests for solid mechanics are presented, starting with simple patch tests of frame-indifference and traction boundary conditions under affine deformations, followed by two large-deformation problems that might serve as standardized verification tests suitable to quantify accuracy, robustness, and convergence of momentum solvers used in solid-mechanics codes. These problems use an accepted standard of verification testing, the method of manufactured solutions (MMS), which is rarely applied in solid mechanics. Body forces inducing a specified deformation are found analytically by treating the constitutive model abstractly, with a specific model introduced only at the last step in examples. One nonaffine MMS problem subjects the momentum solver and constitutive model to large shears comparable to those in penetration, while ensuring natural boundary conditions to accommodate codes lacking support for applied tractions. Two additional MMS problems, one affine and one nonaffine, include nontrivial traction boundary conditions.

[1]  S. Bardenhagen,et al.  The Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method , 2004 .

[2]  Rebecca M. Brannon,et al.  Establishing credibility of particle methods through verification testing , 2011 .

[3]  Stephane Etienne,et al.  Code Verification and the Method of Manufactured Solutions for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems , 2006 .

[4]  Martin Berzins,et al.  Examination and Analysis of Implementation Choices within the Material Point Method (MPM) , 2008 .

[5]  S. D. Pautz,et al.  VERIFICATION OF TRANSPORT CODES BY THE METHOD OF MANUFACTURED SOLUTIONS: THE ATTILA EXPERIENCE , 2001 .

[6]  D. Appelö,et al.  A stable finite difference method for the elastic wave equation on complex geometries with free surfaces , 2007 .

[7]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2002 .

[8]  Rebecca M. Brannon,et al.  Second‐order convected particle domain interpolation (CPDI2) with enrichment for weak discontinuities at material interfaces , 2013 .

[9]  R. D. Krieg,et al.  Accuracies of Numerical Solution Methods for the Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Model , 1977 .

[10]  Deborah Sulsky,et al.  An unconditionally stable, energy–momentum consistent implementation of the material-point method , 2006 .

[11]  R. Brannon,et al.  VERIFICATION OF FRAME INDIFFERENCE FOR COMPLICATED NUMERICAL CONSTITUTIVE MODELS , 2011 .

[12]  Thomas A. Brunner,et al.  Development of a grey nonlinear thermal radiation diffusion verification problem, invited , 2006 .

[13]  Hsuan-Teh Hu,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine on facet joint force and intradiscal pressure - a finite element study , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[14]  R. Brannon,et al.  A multi-stage return algorithm for solving the classical damage component of constitutive models for rocks, ceramics, and other rock-like media , 2010 .

[15]  A. Sadeghirad,et al.  A convected particle domain interpolation technique to extend applicability of the material point method for problems involving massive deformations , 2011 .

[16]  M. Rashid Incremental kinematics for finite element applications , 1993 .

[17]  Romesh C. Batra,et al.  Finite dynamic deformations of smart structures , 1997 .

[18]  Richard A. Regueiro,et al.  Implicit numerical integration of a three-invariant, isotropic/kinematic hardening cap plasticity model for geomaterials , 2005 .

[19]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing , 2011 .

[20]  Rebecca M. Brannon,et al.  KAYENTA : theory and user's guide. , 2009 .

[21]  Patrick Knupp,et al.  Verification of Computer Codes in Computational Science and Engineering , 2002 .

[22]  Yuan Guo-xing,et al.  Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing Code , 2010 .

[23]  D. White,et al.  Verification of high-order mixed FEM solution of transient Magnetic diffusion problems , 2005 .

[24]  Joseph J Monaghan,et al.  An introduction to SPH , 1987 .

[25]  Michal Beneš,et al.  Asynchronous multi-domain variational integrators for nonlinear hyperelastic solids , 2010 .

[26]  L. E. Malvern Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[27]  Leonard E. Schwer,et al.  An overview of the PTC 60/V&V 10: guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics , 2007, Engineering with Computers.

[28]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Verification of Euler/Navier–Stokes codes using the method of manufactured solutions , 2004 .

[29]  D. Agard,et al.  Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  James Guilkey,et al.  An evaluation of explicit time integration schemes for use with the generalized interpolation material point method , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[31]  Attila Kossa,et al.  Exact integration of the von Mises elastoplasticity model with combined linear isotropic-kinematic hardening , 2009 .

[32]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts , 2004 .

[33]  Jeremy E. Kozdon,et al.  Simulation of Dynamic Earthquake Ruptures in Complex Geometries Using High-Order Finite Difference Methods , 2013, J. Sci. Comput..