Cognitive Status in Hemodialysis as a Function of Fluid Adherence

Previous work has shown that dialysis improves cognitive functioning in hemodialysis patients, perhaps due to improvements in anemia among these patients. Such improvements in cognitive performance may lead to better levels of self‐care and adherence with treatment. This study examined the relationship between fluid adherence and cognitive functioning in patients receiving hemodialysis. One hundred forty‐seven patients were assessed with a brief screening instrument, the Cognistat, to determine their current level of functioning during the first hour of hemodialysis. Fluid nonadherence was operationalized as interdialytic weight gain above 1 kg/day. Rates of impairment on the Cognistat subscale ranged from 2.7% (orientation) to 54% (memory) in this sample. Roughly 68% of the sample was nonadherent during the course of treatment. Results found no differences in mean levels of cognitive performance between those who were adherent and those who were not and only modest relationships of measures of anemia to certain aspects of cognitive performance. For the hemodialysis patient to benefit from self‐care education, the patient must be able to understand, remember, reason, and use cognitive processes to modify behavior. These results suggest that more in‐depth assessment of cognitive performance may be needed. In addition, this assessment may need to be conducted on a day when treatment is not received.

[1]  K. Ateş,et al.  RECOGNITION OF NEUROCOGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION IN CHRONIC HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS , 2001, Renal failure.

[2]  A. Dewolfe,et al.  Neuropsychological patterns in uremia. , 1982, Journal of clinical psychology.

[3]  S. Perkins,et al.  Differences in perceptions by stage of fluid adherence. , 2003, Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation.

[4]  A. Nissenson,et al.  Treatment compliance in end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis. , 1986, American journal of nephrology.

[5]  A. Dewolfe,et al.  Halstead‐Reitan Test Results in Chronic Hemodialysis , 1981, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

[6]  D. Churchill,et al.  A comparison of evaluative indices of quality of life and cognitive function in hemodialysis patients. , 1991, Controlled clinical trials.

[7]  H. Hoover Compliance in hemodialysis patients: a review of the literature. , 1989, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[8]  J W Ward,et al.  Neurotoxicity in uremia. , 1975, Kidney international. Supplement.

[9]  D. Lane,et al.  The elderly on dialysis: some considerations in compliance. , 1990, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[10]  L. Schwamm,et al.  The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: comparison with the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination in a neurosurgical population. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  F. Port,et al.  Noncompliance in hemodialysis: predictors and survival analysis. , 1998, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[12]  P. Whitehouse,et al.  Prevalence, recognition, and implications of mental impairment among hemodialysis patients. , 1997, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[13]  D. Schatell,et al.  Hemodialysis patients' symptom experiences: effects on physical and mental functioning. , 2002, Nephrology nursing journal : journal of the American Nephrology Nurses' Association.

[14]  J. Langston,et al.  The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  D. McKee,et al.  Longitudinal study of neuropsychological functioning in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a preliminary report. , 1982, Journal of psychosomatic research.