Experimental challenges to stiffness as a transport paradigm

Two power scans were carried out in H-mode plasmas in DIII-D; one employed standard co-current neutral beam injection (NBI), while the other used a mixture of co-current and counter-current NBI to scan power while holding the torque to a low fixed value. Analysis of the ion and electron heat transport, ion toroidal angular momentum transport, and thermal deuterium transport from these scans is presented. Invariance of the gradients or gradient scalelengths, as might be expected from stiff transport, was not generally observed. When invariance was seen, it was not accompanied by a strong increase in transport, except in the case of the absolute deuterium ion transport. Conduction in the ion channel is the dominant energy loss mechanism. The variation of the ion heat transport with applied power is similar for the co-injection and fixed torque scans, indicating that E × B shearing is not determining the plasma response to additional power. There is however, a quantitative difference in the transport between the two scans, indicating E × B shearing does play a role in the transport. Comparison of these results with a previous experiment that directly probed stiffness at a single radius leads to the following conclusion: while local stiffness as formally defined may hold, invariance of the gradients or normalized scalelengths does not follow from stiff transport in more practical scaling experiments, such as the power scans discussed here. Possible reasons for the lack of correspondence between the local picture and the global expectations are discussed.

[1]  O. Sauter,et al.  Neoclassical conductivity and bootstrap current formulas for general axisymmetric equilibria and arbitrary collisionality regime , 1999 .

[2]  O. J. W. F. Kardaun,et al.  Scalings for tokamak energy confinement , 1990, ArXiv.

[3]  R. Waltz,et al.  A gyro-Landau-fluid transport model , 1997 .

[4]  G. Bateman,et al.  The tokamak Monte Carlo fast ion module NUBEAM in the National Transport Code Collaboration library , 2004 .

[5]  W. H. Meyer,et al.  2D tomography with bolometry in DIII‐Da) , 1995 .

[6]  H R Wilson,et al.  Survey of theories of anomalous transport , 1994 .

[7]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Electron profile stiffness and critical gradient studies , 2012 .

[8]  T. H. Stix,et al.  Heating of toroidal plasmas by neutral injection , 1972 .

[9]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Fast automated analysis of high-resolution reflectometer density profiles on DIII-D , 2006 .

[10]  R. E. Waltz,et al.  Gyro-Landau fluid equations for trapped and passing particles , 2005 .

[11]  F Jenko,et al.  Nonlinear stabilization of tokamak microturbulence by fast ions. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[12]  E Minardi,et al.  Maximum entropy Tokamak configurations , 1990 .

[13]  K. Burrell,et al.  Characterization of cross-section correction to charge exchange recombination spectroscopy rotation measurements using co- and counter-neutral-beam views. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[14]  Clifford E Singer,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF STEADY-STATE BEAM-DRIVEN TOKAMAK REACTORS. , 1983 .

[15]  E. Fable,et al.  Particle transport in tokamak plasmas, theory and experiment , 2009 .

[16]  Jonas Nycander,et al.  Anomalous pinch flux in tokamaks driven by the longitudinal adiabatic invariant , 1995 .

[17]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Experimental constraints on transport from dimensionless parameter scaling studies , 1998 .

[18]  N Hawkes,et al.  A key to improved ion core confinement in the JET tokamak: ion stiffness mitigation due to combined plasma rotation and low magnetic shear. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[19]  Robert James Goldston Energy confinement scaling in Tokamaks: some implications of recent experiments with Ohmic and strong auxiliary heating , 1984 .

[20]  Frank Jenko,et al.  Critical gradient formula for toroidal electron temperature gradient modes , 2001 .

[21]  David Mikkelsen,et al.  Current relaxation time scales in toroidal plasmas , 1989 .

[22]  G. Pucella,et al.  Improved confinement in JET high β plasmas with an ITER-like wall , 2015, 1501.03929.

[23]  T. H. Stix,et al.  Decay of poloidal rotation in a tokamak plasma , 1973 .

[24]  L. L. Lao,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF Q AND ER PROFILES USING THE MOTIONAL STARK EFFECT IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE DIII-D PLASMAS (INVITED) , 1999 .

[25]  M. R. Wade,et al.  Dependence of Heat and Particle Transport on the Ratio of the Ion and Electron Temperatures , 1999 .

[26]  J. Connor,et al.  The neo-classical transport theory of a plasma with multiple ion species , 1973 .

[27]  F. Romanelli,et al.  The linear threshold of the ion‐temperature‐gradient‐driven mode , 1993 .

[28]  D. McCune,et al.  New techniques for calculating heat and particle source rates due to neutral beam injection in axisymmetric tokamaks , 1981 .

[29]  B. P. Duval,et al.  Overview of toroidal momentum transport , 2011 .

[30]  K. Burrell,et al.  High resolution main-ion charge exchange spectroscopy in the DIII-D H-mode pedestal. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[31]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Scaling of heat transport with beta in the DIII-D tokamak , 1998 .

[32]  C. Giroud,et al.  The beta scaling of energy confinement in ELMy H-modes in JET , 2004 .

[33]  William Dorland,et al.  Quantitative predictions of tokamak energy confinement from first‐principles simulations with kinetic effects , 1995 .

[34]  T. N. Carlstrom,et al.  Real-time, vibration-compensated CO2 interferometer operation on the DIII-D tokamak , 1988 .

[35]  R. E. Waltz,et al.  ITER predictions using the GYRO verified and experimentally validated trapped gyro-Landau fluid transport model , 2011 .

[36]  G. Pucella,et al.  Improved Confinement in JET High Beta Plasmas with an ITER-Like Wall , 2015 .