Improving protocol capacity with model-based frame scheduling in IEEE 802.11-operated WLANs

In this paper, we develop a model-based frame scheduling scheme, called MFS, to enhance the capacity of IEEE 802.11-operated wireless LANs (WLANs). In MFS each node estimates the current network status by keeping track of the number of collisions it encounters between its two consecutive successful frame transmissions, and, based on the the estimated information, computes the current network utilization. The result is then used to determine a scheduling delay that is introduced (with the objective of avoiding collision) before a node attempts for transmission of its pending frame. In order to accurately calculate the current utilization in WLANs, we develop an analytical model that characterizes data transmission activities in IEEE 802.11-operated WLANs with/without the RTS/CTS mechanism, and validate the model with ns-2 simulation. All the control overhead incurred in the physical and MAC layers, as well as system parameters specified in IEEE 802.11 are figured in.We have conducted a comprehensive simulation study to evaluate MFS in perspective of number of collisions, achievable throughput, and inter-transmission delay. The simulation results indicate that the performance improvement with respect to protocol capacity can be as high as 20% with RTS/CTS and 150% without RTS/CTS, in a WLAN of up to 300 nodes. In addition, the inter-transmission delay in MFS is smaller and exhibits less variation than that in IEEE 802.11.

[1]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  Analyzing and Tuning the Distributed Coordination Function in the IEEE 802.11 DFWMAC Draft Standard , 1996 .

[2]  Marco Conti,et al.  IEEE 802.11 protocol: design and performance evaluation of an adaptive backoff mechanism , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Peter March,et al.  Stability of binary exponential backoff , 1988, JACM.

[4]  Jim Geier,et al.  Wireless LANs , 2001 .

[5]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[6]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11 , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[7]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Performance of reliable transport protocol over IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN: analysis and enhancement , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[8]  Marco Conti,et al.  Dynamic tuning of the IEEE 802.11 protocol to achieve a theoretical throughput limit , 2000, TNET.

[9]  Michael G. Barry,et al.  Supporting service differentiation in wireless packet networks using distributed control , 2001, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[10]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  Performance study of access control in wireless LANs – IEEE 802.11 DFWMAC and ETSI RES 10 Hiperlan , 1997, Mob. Networks Appl..

[11]  V. Bharghavan Performance evaluation of algorithms for wireless medium access , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium. IPDS'98 (Cat. No.98TB100248).

[12]  Luigi Fratta,et al.  Performance evaluation and enhancement of the CSMA/CA MAC protocol for 802.11 wireless LANs , 1996, Proceedings of PIMRC '96 - 7th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communications.