Institutional Entrepreneurs and Structural Holes in New Field Emergence - Comparative Case Study of Cholesterol-Lowering Functional Foods and Nanotechnology in Finland

This paper extends the emerging body of literature on institutional entrepreneurship by introducing the concept of structural holes to investigate new field emergence. We argue that during field emergence individuals and organizations hold different roles as bridge builders over structural holes between previously unconnected fields and actors. Such pioneers of new fields may draw from their existing network positions and influence the emerging field level institutions. By drawing from a comparative case study of cholesterol-lowering functional foods and nanotechnology in Finland, we provide rich insights into the characteristics of such actors, their bridging attempts and the outcome of eventual field emergence. The research provides interesting implications for further development of institutional theory as well as for practitioners working in emerging fields.

[1]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[2]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[3]  P. Puska Nutrition and mortality: the Finnish experience. , 2000, Acta cardiologica.

[4]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada , 2004 .

[5]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms , 1999 .

[6]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[7]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry , 1991 .

[9]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Challengers, Elites, and Owning Families: A Social Class Theory of Corporate Acquisitions in the 1960s , 2001 .

[10]  N. Phillips,et al.  The Birth of the 'Kodak Moment': Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies , 2005 .

[11]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[12]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Arvind Parkhe “Messy” Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures , 1993 .

[14]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[15]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[16]  L. Zucker Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[17]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[18]  John Hassard,et al.  Triangulation in Organizational Research: A Re-Presentation , 2005 .

[19]  H. Willmott Breaking the Paradigm Mentality , 1993 .

[20]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[21]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[22]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  Markets as Politics: A Political‐Cultural Approach to Market Institutions , 1996 .

[23]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  David J. Cooper,et al.  Business Planning as Pedagogy: Language and Control in a Changing Institutional Field , 1998 .

[25]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[26]  J. Spencer,et al.  Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks , 2003 .

[27]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[28]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[29]  T. Lawrence,et al.  From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-Cultural Discourse and Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Institutional Fields , 2004 .

[30]  Claude Lenfant,et al.  World Heart Day 2002: the international burden of cardiovascular disease: responding to the emerging global epidemic. , 2002, Circulation.

[31]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and Institutional Theory , 1997 .

[32]  John L. Campbell Institutional Change and Globalization , 2020 .

[33]  T. Lawrence Institutional Strategy , 1999 .

[34]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[35]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[36]  Robert I. Sutton,et al.  Crossroads—The Virtues of Closet Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[37]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[38]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Making Network Research Relevant to Practice , 1992 .

[39]  David Knoke,et al.  How Organizational Field Networks Shape Interorganizational Tie-Formation Rates , 2002 .

[40]  Reviewed by Jonathan Levie Managing New Industry Creation: Global Knowledge Formation and Entrepreneurship in High Technology , 2003 .

[41]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[42]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[43]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[44]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  K. Munir The Social Construction of Events: A Study of Institutional Change in the Photographic Field , 2005 .

[47]  R. Burt The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[48]  H. V. D. Ven The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[49]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Caveat Emptor: The Construction of Nonprofit Consumer Watchdog Organizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[53]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Social Movements, Field Frames, and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective , 2003 .

[54]  A. Diplock,et al.  Scientific Concepts of Functional Foods in Europe Consensus Document , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[55]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.