Opening the “Black Box” of Climate Change Science: Actor-Network Theory and Rhetorical Practice in Scientific Controversies

In this essay, Joseph Barton's controversial congressional investigation of the well-known “hockey-stick” study of climate change, produced by Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley, and Malcolm Hughes, is analyzed though the critical lens of actor-network theory. Turning to the works of Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, and John Law, this essay illustrates how the hockey-stick node of this rhetorical climate change actor-network was successfully defended by invoking the entire actor-network as an inventional resource. Suggestions for improving environmental communication and the theoretical linkages between rhetorical criticism, rhetoric of science, and actor-network theory are discussed.

[1]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  Opening Black Boxes: Science, Technology and Society , 1992 .

[2]  Kristen Averyt,et al.  Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[3]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[4]  Chantal Benoit-Barné,et al.  Socio-Technical Deliberation about Free and Open Source Software: Accounting for the Status of Artifacts in Public Life , 2007 .

[5]  G. T. Goodnight,et al.  Accidental rhetoric: The root metaphors of three mile Island , 1981 .

[6]  Herbert W. Simons,et al.  The rhetorical turn : invention and persuasion in the conduct of inquiry , 1990 .

[7]  Joseph N. Tatarewicz,et al.  Counting on Invention: Devices and Black Boxes in Very Big Science , 1994, Osiris.

[8]  Managing Doctors and Saving a Hospital: Irony, Rhetoric and Actor Networks , 2003 .

[9]  Michel Callon,et al.  On Interests and their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment , 1982 .

[10]  B. Mckibben The End of Nature , 1989 .

[11]  Michael Calvin McGee,et al.  Text, context, and the fragmentation of contemporary culture , 1990 .

[12]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[13]  Y. Yonay When Black Boxes Clash: Competing Ideas of What Science Is in Economics, 1924-39 , 1994 .

[14]  B. Latour On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[15]  Ross McKitrick,et al.  Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance , 2005 .

[16]  Ross McKitrick,et al.  The M&M Critique of the MBH98 Northern Hemisphere Climate Index: Update and Implications , 2005 .

[17]  Daniel Neyland,et al.  Dismissed Content and Discontent , 2006 .

[18]  John Law,et al.  Putting Facts Together: A Study of Scientific Persuasion , 1982 .

[19]  A “fusion” of interests: Big science, government, and rhetorical practice in nuclear fusion research , 1996 .

[20]  Lisa A. Best,et al.  Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: , 2000 .

[21]  Barbara E. Willard Rhetorical Landscapes as Epistemic: Revisiting Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac , 2007 .

[22]  A. Gross Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies , 2006 .

[23]  Malcolm K. Hughes,et al.  Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Ross McKitrick,et al.  Corrections to the Mann et. al. (1998) Proxy Data Base and Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series , 2003 .

[25]  O. Canziani,et al.  Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Summary for policymakers , 2007 .

[26]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[27]  B. The,et al.  QUESTIONS SURROUNDING THE ‘HOCKEY STICK’ TEMPERATURE STUDIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENTS HEARINGS , 2007 .

[28]  Laurence D. Smith,et al.  Visual Inscriptions in the Scientific Hierarchy , 2006 .

[29]  G. Thomas Goodnight,et al.  The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation , 1982 .

[30]  Dylan Wolfe The Ecological Jeremiad, the American Myth, and the Vivid Force of Color in Dr. Seuss's The Lorax , 2008 .