Selective abolition of OFF responses in kainic acid-lesioned chicken retina

When ganglion cell responses were recorded from optic axons in the superficial layers of the chicken optic tectum, the responses recorded are predominantly ON-OFF transient, with some ON transient, and rare OFF transient responses. Several weeks after excitotoxic lesion of the retina with 40 nmol of kainic acid injected intravitreally, only ON transient responses could be recorded from the contralateral optic tectum. ON response latency and threshold were not affected. At low light intensities responses in the kainic acid-lesioned retinas showed a sustained component which was not detected in control retinas, but at high light intensities, the sustained component disappeared and the responses were extremely transient. The disappearance of the OFF responses seems to be due to elimination of the OFF component of the responses of cells which are normally ON-OFF transient, rather than the silencing of these cells, leaving only the normally ON transient cells. Morphological evidence suggests that approximately two thirds of the bipolar cells and most amacrine cells are destroyed by the kainic acid lesion (Ingham and Morgan, Neuroscience, 9 (1983) 165-181), and pharmacological logic (Morgan, Prog. Retinal Res., 2 (1983) 247-266) suggests that the missing bipolar cells should be OFF bipolar cells. These results therefore suggest that ON-OFF transient cells receive direct input from bipolar cells, which determines their basic response type. These results also suggest that amacrine cells have little if any role to play in the generation of the basic centre responses of these ON-OFF transient ganglion cells, and that while amacrine cells may have a role in the generation of transient responses in the inner plexiform layer, transient responses can be generated without the intervention of amacrine cells, particularly at high intensities.

[1]  W. Cowan,et al.  The specification of the retino‐tectal projection in the chick , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  K Naka,et al.  Neuron network in catfish retina. , 1985, Neuroscience research. Supplement : the official journal of the Japan Neuroscience Society.

[3]  J. McReynolds,et al.  Sustained synaptic input to ganglion cells of mudpuppy retina , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  P Sterling,et al.  Rod bipolar array in the cat retina: Pattern of input from rods and GABA‐accumulating amacrine cells , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  D. Cohen,et al.  Retinal afferents to the pigeon optic tectum: Discharge characteristics in response to whole field illumination , 1975, Brain Research.

[6]  S. Naghshineh,et al.  Action of glutamate and aspartate analogues on rod horizontal and bipolar cells , 1981, Nature.

[7]  G Westheimer,et al.  The Maxwellian view. , 1966, Vision research.

[8]  H. Karten,et al.  A specific projection of retinal displaced ganglion cells to the nucleus of the basal optic root in the chicken , 1979, Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Kaneko,et al.  Transient calcium current of retinal bipolar cells of the mouse. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  H. Barlow,et al.  Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  I. Morgan,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of intravitreal kainic acid on specific cell types in chicken retina , 1983, Neuroscience.

[12]  Rf Miller,et al.  The role of excitatory amino acid transmitters in the mudpuppy retina: an analysis with kainic acid and N-methyl aspartate , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Sterling Microcircuitry of the cat retina. , 1983, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  R. Pourcho,et al.  Neuronal subpopulations in cat retina which accumulate the GABA agonist, (3H)muscimol: A combined Golgi and autoradiographic study , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  W. Cowan,et al.  The development of the chick optic tectum. II. Autoradiographic studies. , 1971, Brain research.

[16]  R. Dacheux,et al.  Synaptic organization and ionic basis of on and off channels in mudpuppy retina. III. A model of ganglion cell receptive field organization based on chloride-free experiments , 1976, The Journal of general physiology.

[17]  A. Kaneko Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  H. Kolb,et al.  Chapter 2 Neural architecture of the cat retina , 1984 .

[19]  F. Werblin,et al.  A slowly inactivating potassium current truncates spike activity in ganglion cells of the tiger salamander retina , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  I. Morgan,et al.  Intravitreal kainic acid permanently eliminates off-pathways from chicken retina , 1983, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  I. Morgan,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of excitatory neurotoxins on retinal ganglion cells in the chick , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Dowling,et al.  Roles of aspartate and glutamate in synaptic transmission in rabbit retina. II. Inner plexiform layer. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  G. Teuchert,et al.  Specific ganglion cell death induced by intravitreal kainic acid in the chicken retina , 1987, Brain Research.

[24]  J. Dowling The Retina: An Approachable Part of the Brain , 1988 .

[25]  S. Rothman The neurotoxicity of excitatory amino acids is produced by passive chloride influx , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Kaneko,et al.  gamma-Aminobutyric acid exerts a local inhibitory action on the axon terminal of bipolar cells: evidence for negative feedback from amacrine cells. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  F S Werblin,et al.  Regenerative amacrine cell depolarization and formation of on‐off ganglion cell response. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  F. Werblin,et al.  Gated currents generate single spike activity in amacrine cells of the tiger salamander retina. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  N. Ropert,et al.  Visual receptive field types in the nucleus dorsalateralis anterior of the pigeon's thalamus , 1976, Brain Research.

[30]  Visual and nonvisual units recorded from the optic tectum of Gallus domesticus. , 1976, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[31]  Receptive properties of retinal cells and tectal cells in the pigeon. , 1969 .

[32]  A. Guidotti Neurotoxicity of excitatory amino acids , 1990 .

[33]  J. Toyoda,et al.  Analysis of synaptic inputs to on-off amacrine cells of the carp retina , 1988, The Journal of general physiology.

[34]  K. Donner The spectral sensitivity of the pigeon's retinal elements , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  A. Kaneko,et al.  Synaptic transmission from photoreceptors to bipolar and horizontal cells in the carp retina. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[36]  J. E. Vaughn,et al.  GABAergic amacrine cells in rat retina: Immunocytochemical identification and synaptic connectivity , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  J. Dowling,et al.  Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  S. R. Y. Cajal La rétine des vertébrés , 1892 .

[39]  J. Belgum,et al.  Sustained and transient synaptic inputs to on‐off ganglion cells in the mudpuppy retina. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  M. Caserta,et al.  Electron microscopy of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) immunoreactivity in the inner plexiform layer of the rhesus monkey retina , 1986, Journal of neurocytology.

[41]  D. G. Green,et al.  Single retinal ganglion cell responses in the dark-reared rat: Grating acuity, contrast sensitivity, and defocusing , 1978, Vision Research.

[42]  D. A. Burkhardt,et al.  Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine upon electrical activity of the proximal retina. , 1972, Brain research.

[43]  M. Slaughter,et al.  2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid: a new pharmacological tool for retina research. , 1981, Science.

[44]  R. Mark,et al.  An atlas of the primary visual projections in the brain of the chick Gallus gallus , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  I. Morgan,et al.  Kainic acid affects both plexiform layers of chicken retina , 1981, Neuroscience Letters.

[46]  J Toyoda,et al.  Bipolar-amacrine transmission in the carp retina. , 1973, Vision research.

[47]  W. Stell,et al.  GABA‐ergic pathways in the goldfish retina , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  H. Maturana,et al.  Directional Movement and Horizontal Edge Detectors in the Pigeon Retina , 1963, Science.

[49]  M. Millodot,et al.  Retinoscopy and Eye Size , 1970, Science.

[50]  F A Miles,et al.  Centrifugal control of the avian retina. I. Receptive field properties of retinal ganglion cells. , 1972, Brain research.

[51]  I. Morgan,et al.  A physiologically active kainic acid-preferring receptor in chicken retina , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[52]  H. Wässle,et al.  Physiological identification of a morphological class of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  D. Cohen,et al.  Optic chiasm fibers of the pigeon: Discharge characteristics in response to whole field illumination , 1975, Brain Research.

[54]  Teruya Ohtsuka,et al.  Effects of aspartate and glutamate on the bipolar cells in the carp retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[55]  Malcolm M. Slaughter,et al.  Excitatory amino acid receptors of the retina: diversity of subtypes and conductance mechanisms , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  R H Masland,et al.  Responses to acetylcholine of ganglion cells in an isolated mammalian retina. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  H. Wässle,et al.  Pharmacological modulation of the rod pathway in the cat retina. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Kainic acid-induced eye enlargement in chickens: differential effects on anterior and posterior segments. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[59]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  Functional role of efferents to the avian retina. I. Analysis of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.