A Case Study of Changing the Learning Environment in Law: Introducing Computer-Supported Collaborative Activities

This article reports on a 3-year case study of the introduction of computer-supported collaborative activities in a previously traditional lecture-based law course at a large North American research university. The evolving design of the activities is described, as well as the students' and professor's reactions to the new learning environment. Results show that students perceived that the new emphasis on skills was valuable, and that the collaborative learning activities contributed to their learning of content and technical skills as well as teamwork. Implications for design of such activities as well as factors to consider are presented, for instance, any changes must be considered systemically, with evaluation and workload being key components.

[1]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works , 1998 .

[2]  Stephen C. Ehrmann,et al.  Asking the Right Questions: What Does Research Tell Us About Technology and Higher Learning? , 1995 .

[3]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[4]  Lois-Ellin Datta,et al.  Paradigm wars: A basis for peaceful coexistence and beyond , 1994 .

[5]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[6]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[7]  Laura R. Winer,et al.  A distributed collaborative science learning laboratory on the internet , 2000 .

[8]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  Susan R. Feather The Impact of Group Support Systems on Collaborative Learning Groups' Stages of Development. , 1999 .

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[11]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[12]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Actor Interdependence in Collaborative Telelearning. , 1998 .

[13]  T. Hedrick The quantitative-qualitative debate: Possibilities for integration , 1994 .

[14]  E. Paice,et al.  Collaborative learning , 2003, Medical education.

[15]  Anne S. Goodsell Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. , 1992 .

[16]  K. Bruffee Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1995 .

[17]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[18]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[19]  David W. Johnson Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1991. , 1991 .

[20]  J. Swift,et al.  The Second Draft , 1964 .

[21]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[22]  Russell Y. Garth Group-Based Learning. , 1999 .

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .