Automated SEA ICE Classification Over the Baltic SEA using Multiparametric Features of Tandem-X Insar Images

In this study, bistatic interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data acquired by the TanDEM-X mission were used for automated classification of sea ice over the Baltic Sea, in the Bothnic Bay. A scene acquired in March of 2012 was used in the study. Backscatter-intensity, coherence-magnitude and InSAR-phase, as well as their different combinations, were used as informative features in several classification approaches. In order to achieve the best discrimination between open water and several sea ice types (new ice, thin smooth ice, close ice, very close ice, ridged ice, heavily ridged ice and ship-track), Random Forests (RF) and Maximum likelihood (ML) classifiers were employed. The best overall accuracies were achieved using combination of backscatter-intensity & InSAR-phase and backscatter-intensity & coherence-magnitude, and were 76.86% and 75.81% with RF and ML classifiers, respectively. Overall, the combination of backscatter-intensity & InSAR-phase with RF classifier was suggested due to the highest overall accuracy (OA) and smaller computing time in comparison to ML. In contrast to several earlier studies, we were able to discriminate water and the thin smooth ice.

[1]  Rudolf Ressel,et al.  Comparing Near Coincident Space Borne C and X Band Fully Polarimetric SAR Data for Arctic Sea Ice Classification , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Leif E. B. Eriksson,et al.  X-Band Interferometric SAR Observations of Baltic Fast Ice , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Jaan Praks,et al.  TanDEM-X multiparametric data features in sea ice classification over the Baltic sea , 2020, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[4]  Christine Wesche,et al.  C-Band Radar Polarimetry—Useful for Detection of Icebergs in Sea Ice? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Wolfgang Dierking,et al.  Sea Ice Monitoring by Synthetic Aperture Radar , 2013 .

[6]  Peijun Du,et al.  Random Forest and Rotation Forest for fully polarized SAR image classification using polarimetric and spatial features , 2015 .

[7]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  ARKTOS: an intelligent system for SAR sea ice image classification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  Bayesian image classification using Markov random fields , 1996, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  Jaan Praks,et al.  Land Cover and Soil Type Mapping From Spaceborne PolSAR Data at L-Band With Probabilistic Neural Network , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  J. Yackel,et al.  Sea ice type and open water discrimination using dual co-polarized C-band SAR , 2009 .

[11]  Susanne Lehner,et al.  A Neural Network-Based Classification for Sea Ice Types on X-Band SAR Images , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  J. Askne,et al.  SAR interferometry over Baltic Sea ice , 1998 .

[14]  Wolfgang Dierking,et al.  Mapping of Different Sea Ice Regimes Using Images From Sentinel-1 and ALOS Synthetic Aperture Radar , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Jaan Praks,et al.  A Study of Landfast Ice with Sentinel-1 Repeat-Pass Interferometry over the Baltic Sea , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[16]  J. Karvonen,et al.  Estimation of degree of sea ice ridging based on dual-polarized C-band SAR data , 2017 .