Robust Structural Design of an Active Aeroelastic Wing with Maneuver Load Inaccuracies

A multidisciplinary design methodology for aircraft structures subject to inaccuracies in aerodynamic load predictions is presented. A statistical load-correction model is developed that is based on typical differences between loads as predicted by nonlinear and linear aerodynamic theories. Load corrections are propagated to a response function that represents the magnitude of structural redesign that would be necessary when the structure is subject to variation in the loads to which it was designed. The method is applied to an active aeroelastic wing concept, in which both the structural and control law designs are highly sensitive to variations in the aerodynamic loads. Computational fluid dynamics Euler analysis is used to construct the load-correction model. The most critical loading condition is then identified and used to redesign the structure and control-surface gear ratios. The redesigned structure was found to be 11% heavier and significantly more robust than the structure that was optimized with the linear loads only. The present methodology provides a way to account for load inaccuracies in the early phases of the design process, thereby, reducing the need for redesign late in the design process as load predictions become more accurate.

[1]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Astros for reliability-based multidisciplinary structural analysis and optimization , 1995 .

[2]  J. Volk,et al.  Integration of a generic flight control system into ASTROS , 1996 .

[3]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Nonlinear Design Loads for Maneuvering Elastic Aircraft , 2000 .

[4]  T. Y. Tomg,et al.  A RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE FOR MINIMAL VARIATIONS , 1994 .

[5]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Integrated Trim and Structural Design Process for Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology , 2001 .

[6]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Structural Optimization of Flight Vehicles with Computational-Fluid-Dynamics-Based Maneuver Loads , 1999 .

[7]  M. Karpel,et al.  Modal-Based Structural Optimization with Static Aeroelastic and Stress Constraints , 1997 .

[8]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Interpolation using surface splines. , 1972 .

[9]  Gerald D Miller.  Active Flexible Wing (AFW) Technology , 1988 .

[10]  Edmund Pendleton,et al.  Active Aeroelastic Wing Flight Research Program: Technical Program and Model Analytical Development , 2000 .

[11]  Mordechay Karpel,et al.  Modal-Based Enhancement of Integrated Design Optimization Schemes , 1998 .

[12]  M. Love,et al.  ENHANCED MANEUVER AIRLOADS SIMULATION FOR THE AUTOMATED STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM - ASTROS* , 1997 .

[13]  G. Miller.  An active flexible wing multi-disciplinary design optimization method , 1994 .

[14]  M. Love,et al.  An ASTROS application with path dependent results , 1996 .

[15]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[16]  W. P. Rodden,et al.  Equations of motion of a quasisteady flight vehicle utilizing restrained static aeroelastic characteristics , 1985 .

[17]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Maneuver Trim Optimization Techniques for Active Aeroelastic Wings , 2000 .