The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement.

The movement of the center of mass (COM) during human walking has been hypothesized to follow a sinusoidal pattern in the vertical and mediolateral directions. The vertical COM displacement has been shown to increase with velocity, but little is known about the mediolateral movement of the COM. In our evaluation of the mediolateral COM displacement at several walking speeds, 10 normal subjects walked at their self-selected speed and then at 0.7, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.6 m/s in random order. We calculated COM location from a 15-segment, full-body kinematic model using segmental analysis. Mediolateral COM displacement was 6.99 +/- 1.34 cm at the slowest walking speed and decreased to 3.85 +/- 1.41 cm at the fastest speed (p < 0.05). Vertical COM excursion increased from 2.74 +/- 0.52 at the slowest speed to 4.83 +/- 0.92 at the fastest speed (p < 0.05). The data suggest that the relationship between the vertical and mediolateral COM excursions changes substantially with walking speed. Clinicians who use observational gait analysis to assess walking problems should be aware that even normal individuals show significant mediolateral COM displacement at slow speeds. Excessive vertical COM displacement that is obvious at moderate walking speeds may be masked at slow walking speeds.

[1]  J. Saunders,et al.  The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  V. T. Inman.  Human locomotion. , 1966, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[3]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion , 1984 .

[4]  Michael W. Whittle,et al.  Gait Analysis: An Introduction , 1986 .

[5]  M. Pandy,et al.  Quantitative assessment of gait determinants during single stance via a three-dimensional model--Part 1. Normal gait. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  J. P. Paul.  Gait analysis. , 1989, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  M G Pandy,et al.  Quantitative assessment of gait determinants during single stance via a three-dimensional model--Part 2. Pathological gait. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  S. Simon.  Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. , 1993 .

[9]  P. Corcoran,et al.  Energy Expenditure During Ambulation , 1994 .

[10]  The physiological basis of rehabilitation medicine , 1995 .

[11]  MEASURED VERSUS PREDICTED VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT OF THE SACRUM DURING GAIT AS A TOOL TO MEASURE BIOMECHANICAL GAIT PERFORMANCE , 1995, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  Kerrigan Dc,et al.  Measured versus predicted vertical displacement of the sacrum during gait as a tool to measure biomechanical gait performance. , 1995 .

[13]  J. Delisa.  Gait analysis in the science of rehabilitation , 1998 .

[14]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  S. Gard,et al.  The influence of stance-phase knee flexion on the vertical displacement of the trunk during normal walking. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  R. Waters,et al.  The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[17]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  A refined view of the determinants of gait: significance of heel rise. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  M. Grabois.  Physical medicine and rehabilitation : the complete approach , 2000 .

[19]  R. Kram,et al.  Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  A refined view of the determinants of gait. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[21]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  Quantification of pelvic rotation as a determinant of gait. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  A. Kuo,et al.  Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking. , 2004, Human movement science.