Cannabinoid Receptor Blockade Reduces the Opportunity Cost at Which Rats Maintain Operant Performance for Rewarding Brain Stimulation

There is ample evidence that blockade of CB1 receptors reduces reward seeking. However, the reported effects of CB1 blockade on performance for rewarding electrical brain stimulation stand out as an exception. By applying a novel method for conceptualizing and measuring reward seeking, we show that AM-251, a CB1 receptor antagonist, does indeed decrease performance for rewarding electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in rats. Reward seeking depends on multiple sets of variables, including the intensity of the reward, its cost, and the value of competing rewards. In turn, reward intensity depends both on the sensitivity and gain of brain reward circuitry. We show that drug-induced changes in sensitivity cannot account for the suppressive effect of AM-251 on reward seeking. Therefore, the role of CB1 receptors must be sought among the remaining determinants of performance. Our analysis provides an explanation of the inconsistencies between prior reports, which likely arose from the following: (1) the averaging of data across subjects showing heterogeneous effects and (2) the use of methods that cannot distinguish between the different determinants of reward pursuit. By means of microdialysis, we demonstrate that blockade of CB1 receptors attenuates nucleus accumbens dopamine release in response to rewarding medial forebrain bundle stimulation, and we propose that this action is responsible for the ability of the drug to decrease performance for the electrical reward.

[1]  James L Olds,et al.  Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  W HODOS,et al.  Progressive Ratio as a Measure of Reward Strength , 1961, Science.

[3]  R. E. Keesey,et al.  Use of progressive fixed-ratio procedures in the assessment of intracranial reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  P Killeen,et al.  The matching law. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Parametric analysis of brain stimulation reward in the rat: III. Effect of performance variables on the reward summation function. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Formal properties of the matching law. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Reward versus performance in self-stimulation: electrode-specific effects of alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine on reward in the rat. , 1977, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  W. J. Mundl A constant-current stimulator , 1980, Physiology & Behavior.

[11]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[12]  L. Swanson The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, George Paxinos, Charles Watson (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1982), vii + 153, $35.00, ISBN: 0 125 47620 5 , 1984 .

[13]  P. Rompré,et al.  The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation , 1986, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  B. Hoebel,et al.  Feeding and hypothalamic stimulation increase dopamine turnover in the accumbens , 1988, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Measuring the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward by titration with rate of reward. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The function relating the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward to stimulation strength varies with site of stimulation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Saturation of subjective reward magnitude as a function of current and pulse frequency. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[19]  P. Shizgal Neural basis of utility estimation , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  M. Parmentier,et al.  Lack of morphine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor knockout mice. , 1999, European journal of pharmacology.

[21]  E. Valjent,et al.  A behavioural model to reveal place preference to delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice. , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[22]  E. Valjent,et al.  A behavioural model to reveal place preference to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[23]  R. Wise,et al.  Dopamine and glutamate release in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat following lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation , 2001, Neuroscience.

[24]  I. McGregor,et al.  Effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 and the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 on intracranial self-stimulation in Lewis rats. , 2001, Life sciences.

[25]  G. Nomikos,et al.  WIN 55,212-2 decreases the reinforcing actions of cocaine through CB1 cannabinoid receptor stimulation , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  C. Vadász,et al.  Cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice exhibit markedly reduced voluntary alcohol consumption and lack alcohol‐induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens , 2003, Journal of neurochemistry.

[27]  R. Schreiber,et al.  Behavioral mechanisms underlying inhibition of food-maintained responding by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A. , 2004, European journal of pharmacology.

[28]  G. Nomikos,et al.  CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonists increase intracranial self-stimulation thresholds in the rat , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[29]  R. Wightman,et al.  Cannabinoids Enhance Subsecond Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens of Awake Rats , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  I. McGregor,et al.  A cannabinoid receptor antagonist attenuates conditioned place preference but not behavioural sensitization to morphine , 2004, Brain Research.

[31]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Motivational Effects of Cannabinoids and Opioids on Food Reinforcement Depend on Simultaneous Activation of Cannabinoid and Opioid Systems , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[32]  S. Gaetani,et al.  Characterization of the Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor Cyclohexyl Carbamic Acid 3′-Carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl Ester (URB597): Effects on Anandamide and Oleoylethanolamide Deactivation , 2005, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[33]  M. Hamon,et al.  Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are involved in motivational effects of nicotine in rats , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[34]  M. Filip,et al.  Involvement of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in drug addiction: effects of rimonabant on behavioral responses induced by cocaine. , 2006, Pharmacological reports : PR.

[35]  Z. Xi,et al.  Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Antagonist AM251 Inhibits Cocaine-Primed Relapse in Rats: Role of Glutamate in the Nucleus Accumbens , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Anandamide administration alone and after inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) increases dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens shell in rats , 2006, Journal of neurochemistry.

[37]  P. Shizgal,et al.  Prolonged rewarding stimulation of the rat medial forebrain bundle: neurochemical and behavioral consequences. , 2006, Behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  P. Shizgal,et al.  Predictable and unpredictable rewards produce similar changes in dopamine tone. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[40]  R. Wightman,et al.  Phasic Dopamine Release Evoked by Abused Substances Requires Cannabinoid Receptor Activation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Jennifer A. Geaga,et al.  URB602 inhibits monoacylglycerol lipase and selectively blocks 2-arachidonoylglycerol degradation in intact brain slices. , 2007, Chemistry & biology.

[42]  L. Parker,et al.  Effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on quinine palatability and AM251 on sucrose and quinine palatability using the taste reactivity test , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[43]  D. Piomelli,et al.  The endocannabinoid system in brain reward processes , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[44]  P. Shizgal,et al.  The reinforcement mountain: allocation of behavior as a function of the rate and intensity of rewarding brain stimulation. , 2008, Behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  Z. Xi,et al.  Attenuation of basal and cocaine-enhanced locomotion and nucleus accumbens dopamine in cannabinoid CB1-receptor-knockout mice , 2009, Psychopharmacology.

[46]  Lin Lu,et al.  Effects of cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in consolidation and reconsolidation of methamphetamine reward memory in mice , 2009, Psychopharmacology.

[47]  E. Rasmussen,et al.  Effects of rimonabant on behavior maintained by progressive ratio schedules of sucrose reinforcement in obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats , 2008, Behavioural pharmacology.

[48]  M. Shoaib The cannabinoid antagonist AM251 attenuates nicotine self-administration and nicotine-seeking behaviour in rats , 2008, Neuropharmacology.

[49]  Z. Xi,et al.  Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Antagonists Attenuate Cocaine's Rewarding Effects: Experiments with Self-Administration and Brain-Stimulation Reward in Rats , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[50]  R. Wise Dopamine and reward: The anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on , 2008, Neurotoxicity Research.

[51]  E. Vizi,et al.  Neurochemical evidence that stimulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors on GABAergic nerve terminals activates the dopaminergic reward system by increasing dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens , 2009, Neurochemistry International.

[52]  C. Martin-Soelch Is depression associated with dysfunction of the central reward system? , 2009, Biochemical Society transactions.

[53]  P. Shizgal,et al.  Rattus Psychologicus: Construction of preferences by self-stimulating rats , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[54]  B. Lutz,et al.  Central side-effects of therapies based on CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists: focus on anxiety and depression. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[55]  Benjamin F. Cravatt,et al.  Selective blockade of 2-arachidonoylglycerol hydrolysis produces cannabinoid behavioral effects , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[56]  P. Shizgal,et al.  At What Stage of Neural Processing Does Cocaine Act to Boost Pursuit of Rewards? , 2010, PloS one.