POLICE PRODUCTIVITY AND CRIME RATES: 1973‐1992*

According to the Uniform Crime Reports, violent crime rates increased dramatically over the past two decades. National Crime Victimization Survey data, on the other hand, indicate that the rates of violent crime remained relatively stable or dropped during this period. Which series provides a “correct” estimate of crime-rate trends is of more than academic interest. Highly publicized statistics on crime trends influence the public's concerns about crime and the decisions of policymakers both directly through their own perceptions of crime trends and indirectly through demands by the general public to control crime. This article compares these two major series on trends in violent crime rates in the United States for the period 1973–1992, with the goal of assessing the extent to which they measure the same underlying phenomenon: fluctuations in violent crime rates. The series are related (but not strongly). My conclusion, with some reservation, is that changes in law enforcement agencies rather than changes in the rates of violent crime incidents have created the upward trend in UCR violent crime rates during the past two decades.

[1]  James P. Levine.  THE POTENTIAL FOR CRIME OVERREPORTING IN CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION SURVEYS , 1976 .

[2]  Robert M. O'Brien.  Comparing detrended UCR and NCS crime rates over time: 1973-1986 , 1990 .

[3]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  UNEMPLOYMENT AND CRIME RATES IN THE POST- WORLD WAR II UNITED STATES: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[4]  S. Menard.  RESIDUAL GAINS, RELIABILITY, AND THEUCR-NCS RELATIONSHIP: A COMMENT ON BLUMSTEIN, COHEN, AND ROSENFELD (1991)* , 1992 .

[5]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  TREND AND DEVIATION IN CRIME RATES: A COMPARISON OF UCR AND NCS DATA FOR BURGLARY AND ROBBERY* , 1991 .

[6]  Robert M. O'Brien.  Detrended UCR and NCS crime rates: Their utility and meaning , 1991 .

[7]  Glenn D. Rudebusch.  The Uncertain Unit Root in Real GNP , 1992 .

[8]  Lawrence E. Raffalovich.  Detrending Time Series , 1994 .

[9]  C. Granger,et al.  Spurious regressions in econometrics , 1974 .

[10]  A TIME SERIES ANALYSIS OF VIOLENT CRIME AND ITS RELATION TO PROLONGED STATES OF WARFARE: THE ISRAELI CASE* , 1988 .

[11]  Encouraging news for criminologists (in the year 2050)? A comment on O'Brien (1990) , 1991 .

[12]  Michael P. Murray.  A Drunk and Her Dog: An Illustration of Cointegration and Error Correction , 1994 .

[13]  W. Gove,et al.  ARE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS A VALID INDICATOR OF THE INDEX CRIMES? AN AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER WITH MINOR QUALIFICATIONS* , 1985 .

[14]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  The "dark figure" and composite indexes of crime: Some empirical explorations of alternative data sources , 1984 .

[15]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Comparing measures of homicide trends: Methodological and substantive differences in the Vital Statistics and Uniform Crime Report time series (1933–1975) , 1980 .

[16]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Glenn D. Rudebusch.  Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: A Re-examination , 1992 .

[18]  Heejoon Kang,et al.  Pitfalls in the Use of Time as an Explanatory Variable in Regression , 1983 .

[19]  G. Jensen,et al.  MANAGING RAPE: EXPLORATORY RESEARCH ON THE BEHAVIOR OF RAPE STATISTICS* , 1993 .

[20]  S. Vali,et al.  Pitfalls in the Estimation of a Differenced Model , 1988 .

[21]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[22]  Scott Menard,et al.  UCR and NCS: Comparisons over space and time , 1988 .

[23]  D. McDowall,et al.  COMPARING THE UCR AND NCS OVER TIME , 1992 .

[24]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Property Crime Rates in the United States: A Macrodynamic Analysis, 1947-1977; With Ex Ante Forecasts for the Mid-1980s , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.