Gender and learning: Comparing two theories

The research domain of gender and learning seems to develop in two different areas. In one area learning is investigated by using general theories on learning and instruction. In the second area, gender plays a central role in the theoretical frameworks. The present article compares two theories from these areas using a general perspective and a gender perspective. By doing this, we intend to combine knowledge resulting from the two distinct areas and possibly take the research domain of gender and learning a step further. The theories in the comparison concern Vermunt's learning conceptions (1996) and Baxter Magolda's ways of knowing and patterns of reasoning (1992). It turns out that a number of relations seems to exist on a conceptual level between these two theories, but the relations could not be confirmed empirically. In the discussion, the results are elaborated upon and possible future research is suggested.

[1]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[2]  Michael P. Ryan.  Monitoring Text Comprehension: Individual Differences in Epistemological Standards , 1984 .

[3]  K. Lonka,et al.  Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology , 1996 .

[4]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[5]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Analysis and development of students' skill in selfregulated learning , 1988 .

[6]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development , 1992 .

[7]  J. Vermunt.  Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis , 1996 .

[8]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[9]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Styles of learning and teaching , 1981 .

[10]  M. Belenky.  Women's Ways Of Knowing , 1986 .

[11]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  Individual differences in cognition , 1983 .

[12]  Lynda D. Stone,et al.  The Education feminism reader , 1994 .

[13]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[14]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[15]  Carol Gilligan,et al.  Woman's Place in Man's Life Cycle , 1979 .

[16]  S. Severiens,et al.  Ways of knowing and patterns of reasoning: searching for gender-sensitive dimensions , 1998 .

[17]  S. Severiens,et al.  Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis , 1994 .

[18]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations , 1992 .

[19]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[20]  Geert ten Dam,et al.  Gender and Gender Identity Differences in Learning Styles , 1997 .

[21]  Erik De Corte,et al.  International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology , 1996 .

[22]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[23]  J. Vermunt.  Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs : naar procesgerichte instructie in zelfstandig denken , 1992 .

[24]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender Differences in the Experience of Higher Education: quantitative and qualitative approaches , 1991 .

[25]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[26]  William G. Perry,et al.  Patterns of Development in Thought and Values of Students in a Liberal Arts College: A Validation of a Scheme. Final Report. , 1968 .