Lameness detection challenges in automated milking systems addressed with partial least squares discriminant analysis.

Lameness causes decreased animal welfare and leads to higher production costs. This study explored data from an automatic milking system (AMS) to model on-farm gait scoring from a commercial farm. A total of 88 cows were gait scored once per week, for 2 5-wk periods. Eighty variables retrieved from AMS were summarized week-wise and used to predict 2 defined classes: nonlame and clinically lame cows. Variables were represented with 2 transformations of the week summarized variables, using 2-wk data blocks before gait scoring, totaling 320 variables (2 × 2 × 80). The reference gait scoring error was estimated in the first week of the study and was, on average, 15%. Two partial least squares discriminant analysis models were fitted to parity 1 and parity 2 groups, respectively, to assign the lameness class according to the predicted probability of being lame (score 3 or 4/4) or not lame (score 1/4). Both models achieved sensitivity and specificity values around 80%, both in calibration and cross-validation. At the optimum values in the receiver operating characteristic curve, the false-positive rate was 28% in the parity 1 model, whereas in the parity 2 model it was about half (16%), which makes it more suitable for practical application; the model error rates were, 23 and 19%, respectively. Based on data registered automatically from one AMS farm, we were able to discriminate nonlame and lame cows, where partial least squares discriminant analysis achieved similar performance to the reference method.

[1]  D. Piwczyński,et al.  Statistical modeling of calving ease and stillbirths in dairy cattle using the classification tree technique , 2013 .

[2]  C J Rutten,et al.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  A. Bach,et al.  Associations between lameness and production, feeding and milking attendance of Holstein cows milked with an automatic milking system , 2006, Journal of Dairy Research.

[4]  D Berckmans,et al.  Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  L. Green Lameness in dairy cows; piecing together the evidence base and looking forward. , 2009 .

[6]  J. Kaler,et al.  Effect of mobility score on milk yield and activity in dairy cattle. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  M. Greinera,et al.  Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests , 2000 .

[8]  M. Nielen,et al.  Comparison of analysis techniques for on-line detection of clinical mastitis. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Frede Aakmann Tøgersen,et al.  Evaluation of a lameness scoring system for dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  H. Callesen,et al.  A universal index of uterine discharge symptoms from calving to 6 weeks postpartum. , 2011, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[11]  R. Jonsson Detection of Oestrus and Lameness in Dairy Cows , 2011 .

[12]  P Løvendahl,et al.  On the use of physical activity monitoring for estrus detection in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  N. Lyons,et al.  Factors associated with extended milking intervals in a pasture-based automatic milking system , 2013 .

[14]  C. Bisaglia,et al.  Automatic vs. conventional feeding systems in robotic milking dairy farms: a survey in The Netherlands , 2012 .

[15]  R M de Mol,et al.  Applicability of day-to-day variation in behavior for the automated detection of lameness in dairy cows. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  D M Weary,et al.  Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle--key concepts and the role of science. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows using wavelet analysis , 2012 .

[18]  D. Sprecher,et al.  A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. , 1997, Theriogenology.

[19]  S. Mokaram Ghotoorlar,et al.  Lameness scoring system for dairy cows using force plates and artificial intelligence , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[20]  Jeffrey Rushen,et al.  Effect of lameness on dairy cows' visits to automatic milking systems , 2008 .

[21]  Claudia Bahr,et al.  Original paper: Real-time automatic lameness detection based on back posture extraction in dairy cattle: Shape analysis of cow with image processing techniques , 2010 .

[22]  Per Larsson Economic analysis of the De Laval activity meter system for heat detection , 2007 .

[23]  Michael A Babyak,et al.  What You See May Not Be What You Get: A Brief, Nontechnical Introduction to Overfitting in Regression-Type Models , 2004, Psychosomatic medicine.

[24]  M. Vaarst,et al.  Systematic clinical examinations for identification of latent udder health types in Danish dairy herds. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  Arno Pluk,et al.  Development of a real time cow gait tracking and analysing tool to assess lameness using a pressure sensitive walkway: the GAITWISE system , 2011 .

[26]  S. Wold,et al.  Source contributions to ambient aerosol calculated by discriminat partial least squares regression (PLS) , 1988 .

[27]  J. Amory,et al.  The effect of lameness on lying behaviour of zero grazed Holstein dairy cattle , 2011 .

[28]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Effect of management on prevention of Salmonella Dublin exposure of calves during a one-year control programme in 84 Danish dairy herds. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[29]  A Bach,et al.  Short communication: lying behavior of lactating dairy cows is influenced by lameness especially around feeding time. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  D. Ballabio,et al.  Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA , 2013 .

[31]  J M Siegford,et al.  Invited review: The impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cow management, behavior, health, and welfare. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  Rocco DiFoggio,et al.  Examination of Some Misconceptions about Near-Infrared Analysis , 1995 .

[33]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Principal component analysis for the early detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows. , 2013, The Journal of dairy research.

[34]  Carlos Serrano-Cinca,et al.  Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis for bankruptcy prediction , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  W Steeneveld,et al.  Comparing technical efficiency of farms with an automatic milking system and a conventional milking system. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  Laurent Debrauwer,et al.  Selection of biomarkers by a multivariate statistical processing of composite metabonomic data sets using multiple factor analysis. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[37]  C. Jun,et al.  Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present , 2005 .

[38]  C W Heald,et al.  A computerized mastitis decision aid using farm-based records: an artificial neural network approach. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multivariate data analysis as a tool in advanced quality monitoring in the food production chain , 2002 .

[40]  Patrick F. Fox,et al.  Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences , 2003 .

[41]  C.J.A.M. de Koning,et al.  Milking Machines | Robotic Milking , 2011 .

[42]  J. Sim,et al.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[43]  C. C. Ketelaar-de Lauwere,et al.  The influence of social hierarchy on the time budget of cows and their visits to an automatic milking system , 1996 .

[44]  D M Weary,et al.  Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[45]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of neural networks , 2008 .

[46]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[47]  J. Jensen,et al.  Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.