Four-Dimensional Variational Assimilation of Water Vapor Differential Absorption Lidar Data: The First Case Study within IHOP_2002

Four-dimensional variational assimilation of water vapor differential absorption lidar (DIAL) data has been applied for investigating their impact on the initial water field for mesoscale weather forecasting. A case that was observed during the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) has been selected. During 24 May 2002, data from the NASA Lidar Atmospheric Sensing Experiment were available upstream of a convective system that formed later along the dryline and a cold front. Tools were developed for routinely assimilating water vapor DIAL data into the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). The results demonstrate a large impact on the initial water vapor field. This is due to the high resolution and accuracy of DIAL data making the observation of the high spatial variability of humidity in the region of the dryline and of the cold front possible. The water vapor field is mainly adjusted by a modification of the atmospheric wind field changing the moisture transport. A positive impact of the improved initial fields on the spatial/temporal prediction of convective initiation is visible. The results demonstrate the high value of accurate, vertically resolved mesoscale water vapor observations and advanced data assimilation systems for short-range weather forecasting.

[1]  T D Wilkerson,et al.  Water vapor differential absorption lidar development and evaluation. , 1979, Applied optics.

[2]  G. Zängl.  The sensitivity of simulated orographic precipitation to model components other than cloud microphysics , 2004 .

[3]  E. Browell,et al.  ASSIMILATION OF DIAL DATA IN MESOSCALE MODELS: AN IMPACT STUDY DURING IHOP_2002 , 2004 .

[4]  X. Zou,et al.  Initialization and Simulation of a Landfalling Hurricane Using a Variational Bogus Data Assimilation Scheme , 2000 .

[5]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[6]  Syed Ismail,et al.  Impact of high resolution water vapor cross‐sectional data on hurricane forecasting , 2003 .

[7]  Correction scheme for spectral broadening by Rayleigh scattering in differential absorption lidar measurements of water vapor in the troposphere. , 1987, Applied optics.

[8]  Donato Summa,et al.  Simulation of the performance of WALES based on an end-to-end model , 2004 .

[9]  M. McCormick.  Airborne and Spaceborne Lidar , 2005 .

[10]  Kenneth J. Westrick,et al.  Does Increasing Horizontal Resolution Produce More Skillful Forecasts , 2002 .

[11]  M. Xue,et al.  A high-resolution modeling study of the 24 May 2002 dryline case during IHOP. part I: Numerical simulation and general evolution of the dryline and convection , 2006 .

[12]  C. Walther,et al.  Future Performance of Ground-Based and Airborne Water-Vapor Differential Absorption Lidar. II. Simulations of the Precision of a Near-Infrared, High-Power System. , 2001, Applied optics.

[13]  David R. Stauffer,et al.  Multiscale four-dimensional data assimilation , 1994 .

[14]  John Derber,et al.  The National Meteorological Center's spectral-statistical interpolation analysis system , 1992 .

[15]  J. Joiner,et al.  Efficient methods to assimilate remotely sensed data based on information content , 1998 .

[16]  B. Geerts,et al.  Finescale Vertical Structure of a Cold Front as Revealed by an Airborne Doppler Radar , 2006 .

[17]  H. Pan,et al.  Nonlocal Boundary Layer Vertical Diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast Model , 1996 .

[18]  M. Baldwin,et al.  THE WGNE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT-TERM QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS , 2003 .

[19]  E. Browell,et al.  Airborne and spaceborne lidar measurements of water vapor profiles: a sensitivity analysis. , 1989, Applied optics.

[20]  Patrick Arnaud,et al.  Influence of rainfall spatial variability on flood prediction , 2002 .

[21]  Ming Xue,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Convection of the 24 May 2002 IHOP Case Using Very Large Ensembles , 2006 .

[22]  Steven E. Koch,et al.  An Overview of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and Some Preliminary Highlights , 2004 .

[23]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor profiling: assessment of accuracy, resolution, and meteorological applications. , 1998, Applied optics.

[24]  R. Frehlich,et al.  Estimates of Turbulence from Numerical Weather Prediction Model Output with Applications to Turbulence Diagnosis and Data Assimilation , 2004 .

[25]  Ying-Hwa Kuo,et al.  Assimilation of Atmospheric Radio Refractivity Using a Nonhydrostatic Adjoint Model , 1995 .

[26]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Investigation of Turbulent Processes in the Lower Troposphere with Water Vapor DIAL and Radar–RASS , 1999 .

[27]  G. Zängl.  Numerical simulations of the 12–13 August 2002 flooding event in eastern Germany , 2004 .

[28]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  Impact of CAMEX-4 Datasets for Hurricane Forecasts Using a Global Model , 2006 .

[29]  John S. Kain,et al.  The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update , 2004 .

[30]  P. Di Girolamo,et al.  End-To-End Simulation of the Performance of Wales: Forward Module , 2004 .

[31]  Edward V. Browell,et al.  First Lidar Measurements of Water Vapor and Aerosols from a High-Altitude Aircraft , 1995, Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere.

[32]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[33]  E. Browell,et al.  The “Triple Point” on 24 May 2002 during IHOP. Part I: Airborne Doppler and LASE Analyses of the Frontal Boundaries and Convection Initiation , 2006 .

[34]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data , 2000 .

[35]  R. Houze,et al.  The MAP special observing period , 2001 .

[36]  M. Xue,et al.  A High-Resolution Modeling Study of the 24 May 2002 Dryline Case during IHOP. Part II: Horizontal Convective Rolls and Convective Initiation , 2006 .

[37]  Wei Huang,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System for MM5: Implementation and Initial Results , 2004 .

[38]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Use of Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation in a Limited-Area Mesoscale Model. Part I: Experiments with Synoptic-Scale Data , 1990 .

[39]  C. Walther,et al.  Future performance of ground-based and airborne water-vapor differential absorption lidar. I. Overview and theory. , 2001, Applied optics.

[40]  James C. Barnes,et al.  Development of the Lidar Atmospheric Sensing Experiment (LASE): An Advanced Airborne DIAL Instrument , 1997 .

[41]  Jen‐Ping Chen,et al.  Simulation of cloud microphysical and chemical processes using a multicomponent framework. Part I: Description of the microphysical model , 1994 .

[42]  William B. Grant,et al.  Differential absorption lidar (DIAL) measurements from air and space , 1998 .

[43]  Christopher A. Davis,et al.  Summary of the 1998 Workshop on Mesoscale Model Verification , 2000 .

[44]  J. G. Michalakes,et al.  Development of an MM5-Based Four Dimensional Variational Analysis System for Distributed Memory Multiprocessor Computers , 2001 .

[45]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: methodology. , 1998, Applied optics.

[46]  J. Michael Fritsch,et al.  Improving quantitative precipitation forecasts in the warm season: A USWRP research and development strategy , 2004 .

[47]  N. S. Higdon,et al.  LASE Validation Experiment , 1997 .