Dynamic performance metrics to assess sustainability and cost effectiveness of integrated urban water systems

Abstract A comprehensive set of metrics quantifying sustainability and cost effectiveness of urban water systems is required to rigorously inform policy, design and management decisions, as cities all over the world face the combined pressures of drought and flood, climatic uncertainty, rising population, and an increasingly complex wastewater. These metrics need to be generated using an integrated system approach covering the whole urban water cycle, be capable of assessing a wide range of scenarios including innovations, be able simulate system metric dynamics at a range of time steps including sub-daily, and to create a comprehensive set of technical, economic and environmental variables. A dynamic system engineering modelling framework has been developed to provide a comprehensive set of dynamic performance metrics, integrating all six subsystems of the water cycle viz. (a) water supply; (b) urban water consumers; (c) industrial water consumers (e.g. metallurgical, plastics, construction, recycling industries also as processor or residues); (d) agricultural water consumers; (e) stormwater generation and treatment; and (f) sewerage and wastewater treatment. Dynamic material, component and energy balances, thermodynamics and kinetics, along with life cycle assessment and process economics enable the following variables to be simultaneously throughout the integrated water system viz. water, wastewater, rainfall, stormwater; dissolved constituents (e.g. BOD, TN); embodied energy of system/structures, energy consumed and generated; dynamic environmental impacts and greenhouse gas emissions (arising from water, wastewater, stormwater, dissolved constituents, reagents, infrastructure materials, sludge processing, recycling of materials, direct greenhouse gas emissions, energy); and financial costs (operating and capital). The novel framework has been applied to an innovative urban case study site; a MATLAB/Simulink® simulation model linked to Simapro® data compares infrastructure scales at the site viz. (a) conventional city-scale infrastructure; (b) suburban-scale infrastructure with dual reticulation of potable and recycled water to every house; and (c) household-scale infrastructure, where each house has a grey water recycling unit.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[2]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental assessment of products volume 1: Methodology, tools, and case studies in product , 1997 .

[3]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Dynamic modelling of E-waste recycling system performance based on product design , 2010 .

[4]  Donald E. Garrett,et al.  Chemical Engineering Economics , 1989 .

[5]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[6]  A. Tillman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal waste water systems , 1998 .

[7]  T. Wong,et al.  Buffer strips, vegetated swales, and bioretention systems , 2006 .

[8]  Rae Mackay Developing a New Scoping Model for Urban Water Sustainability , 2007 .

[9]  Andrew Grant,et al.  Integrated urban water modelling - Past, present and future , 2007 .

[10]  Rodney Anthony Stewart,et al.  Gold Coast Domestic Water End Use Study , 2009 .

[11]  Some examples of water recycling in Australian urban environments: a step towards environmental sustainability , 2003 .

[12]  S Lundie,et al.  Quantitative systems analysis as a strategic planning approach for metropolitan water service providers. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Process Dynamics and Control , 1989 .

[14]  W. Gujer,et al.  The concept of sustainable Urban Water Management , 1997 .

[15]  John N. Lester,et al.  The Life-Cycle Analysis of Small-Scale Sewage-Treatment Processes , 1995 .

[16]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Assessing the Ecological Footprint of a Large Metropolitan Water Supplier: Lessons for Water Management and Planning towards Sustainability , 2003 .

[17]  Aidan,et al.  Engineering Project Appraisal , 2001 .

[18]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[19]  Gilbert Svensson,et al.  SEWSYS - a tool for simulation of substance flows in urban sewer systems , 2005 .

[20]  Z. Alach Australian drinking water guidelines , 2008 .

[21]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[22]  Gary Brierley,et al.  The Use of System Dynamics Simulation in Water Resources Management , 2009 .

[23]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Towards a deeper and broader ecological footprint , 2008 .

[24]  B. Bates,et al.  Climate change and water. , 2008 .

[25]  Thomas E. Marlin,et al.  Process Control: Designing Processes and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance , 1995 .

[26]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[27]  Ashok K. Sharma,et al.  Environmental and Economic Assessment of Urban Water Services for a Greenfield Development , 2009 .

[28]  Jacinta Burke Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (WELS) Scheme , 2009 .

[29]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Management of the Web of Water and Web of Materials , 2010 .

[30]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[31]  Tony Hoong Fatt Wong,et al.  Australian runoff quality: a guide to water sensitive urban design , 2006 .

[32]  E. Friedrich,et al.  The use of LCA in the water industry and the case for an environmental performance indicator , 2010 .

[33]  D Hellström,et al.  Systems analysis for environmental assessment of urban water and wastewater systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  V. G. Mitchell,et al.  Simulating the urban water and contaminant cycle , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..