Computer‐aided Dental Identification: An Objective Method for Assessment of Radiographic Image Similarity *

Abstract:  A pilot study evaluated a computer‐based method for comparing digital dental images, utilizing a registration algorithm to correct for variations in projection geometry between images prior to a subtraction analysis. A numerical assessment of similarity was generated for pairs of images. Using well‐controlled laboratory settings, the method was evaluated as to its ability to identify the correct specimen with positive results. A subsequent clinical study examined longitudinal radiographic examinations of selected anatomical areas on 47 patients, analyzing the computer‐based method in making the correct identification based upon a threshold level of similarity. The results showed that at a threshold of 0.855, there were two false negative and two false positive identifications out of 957 analyses. Based on these initial findings, 25 dental records having two sets of full mouth series of radiographs were selected. The radiographs were digitized and grouped into six anatomical regions. The more recent set of films served as postmortem images. Each postmortem image was analyzed against all other images within the region. Images were registered to correct for differences in projection geometry prior to analysis. An area of interest was selected to assess image similarity. Analysis of variance was used to determine that there was a significant difference between images from the same individual and those from different individuals. Results showed that the threshold level of concordance will vary with the anatomical region of the mouth examined. This method may provide the most objective and reliable method for postmortem dental identification using intra‐oral images.

[1]  S M Dunn,et al.  Recognizing invariant geometric structure in dental radiographs. , 1992, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[2]  D. Sweet,et al.  A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity , 2001 .

[3]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Digital Imaging Processing , 2010 .

[4]  W D McDavid,et al.  Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  Victor Walter Weedn Postmortem Identification of Remains , 1998 .

[6]  M. Lincoln,et al.  Dentists' qualifications affect the accuracy of radiographic identification. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[8]  D. Sweet,et al.  Why a dentist for identification? , 2001, Dental clinics of North America.

[9]  S. Sholl,et al.  Evaluation of dental radiographic identification: an experimental study. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[10]  V W Weedn,et al.  Postmortem identifications of remains. , 1998, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[11]  R Repges,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for digital subtraction radiography. , 1997, Computers in biology and medicine.

[12]  V. M. Phillips,et al.  Comparison between fingerprint and dental concordant characteristics. , 1990, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.

[13]  T. Solheim,et al.  The “Scandinavian Star” ferry disaster 1990 -a challenge to forensic odontology , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[14]  J. S. Hubar,et al.  Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  N. Robb 229 people, 15,000 body parts: pathologists help solve Swissair 111's grisly puzzles. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[16]  S. Kogon,et al.  Validation of dental radiographs for human identification. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[17]  H. Borrman,et al.  Accuracy among dentists experienced in forensic odontology in establishing identity. , 1993, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.

[18]  A Wenzel Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography. , 1989, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  C Michael Bowers,et al.  Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[20]  G. L. Bell Dentistry's role in the resolution of missing and unidentified persons cases. , 2001, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  H. Borrman,et al.  Quality evaluation of 10 years patient records in forensic odontology , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[22]  D. Sweet,et al.  The reliability of digitized radiographs for dental identification: a Web-based study. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[23]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Accuracy in establishing identity by means of intraoral radiographs. , 1990, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.