Computer‐aided Dental Identification: An Objective Method for Assessment of Radiographic Image Similarity *
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Senn | Paula C. Brumit | D. Flint | S. Brent Dove | M. White | Paula C. Brumit | David R. Senn | Diane J. Flint | Stephen Brent Dove | Marea White
[1] S M Dunn,et al. Recognizing invariant geometric structure in dental radiographs. , 1992, Dento maxillo facial radiology.
[2] D. Sweet,et al. A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity , 2001 .
[3] Giovanni Mettivier,et al. Digital Imaging Processing , 2010 .
[4] W D McDavid,et al. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[5] Victor Walter Weedn. Postmortem Identification of Remains , 1998 .
[6] M. Lincoln,et al. Dentists' qualifications affect the accuracy of radiographic identification. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.
[7] A. Wenzel,et al. Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography. , 1995, Forensic science international.
[8] D. Sweet,et al. Why a dentist for identification? , 2001, Dental clinics of North America.
[9] S. Sholl,et al. Evaluation of dental radiographic identification: an experimental study. , 2001, Forensic science international.
[10] V W Weedn,et al. Postmortem identifications of remains. , 1998, Clinics in laboratory medicine.
[11] R Repges,et al. A comparison of similarity measures for digital subtraction radiography. , 1997, Computers in biology and medicine.
[12] V. M. Phillips,et al. Comparison between fingerprint and dental concordant characteristics. , 1990, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.
[13] T. Solheim,et al. The “Scandinavian Star” ferry disaster 1990 -a challenge to forensic odontology , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.
[14] J. S. Hubar,et al. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.
[15] N. Robb. 229 people, 15,000 body parts: pathologists help solve Swissair 111's grisly puzzles. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[16] S. Kogon,et al. Validation of dental radiographs for human identification. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.
[17] H. Borrman,et al. Accuracy among dentists experienced in forensic odontology in establishing identity. , 1993, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.
[18] A Wenzel. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography. , 1989, Dento maxillo facial radiology.
[19] C Michael Bowers,et al. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.
[20] G. L. Bell. Dentistry's role in the resolution of missing and unidentified persons cases. , 2001, Dental clinics of North America.
[21] H. Borrman,et al. Quality evaluation of 10 years patient records in forensic odontology , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.
[22] D. Sweet,et al. The reliability of digitized radiographs for dental identification: a Web-based study. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.
[23] H. Gröndahl,et al. Accuracy in establishing identity by means of intraoral radiographs. , 1990, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.