Stakeholder management and sustainability strategies in the French nuclear industry

This paper describes how a nuclear power corporation integrates sustainability into corporate strategies and practices. The case study focuses on one of the world's largest nuclear power generators and describes the corporate capture of sustainable development in its strategic efforts to promote a growth strategy. The paper shows how corporate strategies to address sustainability concerns involve managing different stakeholders, enabling the corporation to sustain its economic growth strategy. Three types of stakeholder management strategy are identified: reinforcement strategies for supportive stakeholders, containment strategies for obstructive stakeholders and stabilization strategies for passive stakeholders. The paper argues that, despite claims of sustainable development in the nuclear industry, there is no significant shift in the ‘business as usual’ approach and that sustainable development is merely reframed as sustainable growth.

[1]  Richard Welford,et al.  Editorial: Corporate environmental management, technology and sustainable development: postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical research agenda , 1998 .

[2]  T. Jones,et al.  Stakeholder‐Agency Theory , 1992 .

[3]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[4]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[5]  C. MacDonald,et al.  Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line” , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[6]  Reinhard Steurer,et al.  Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the Stakeholder Theory of the Firm to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations , 2006 .

[7]  S. Banerjee.  Whose Land Is It Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses , 2000 .

[8]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[9]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[10]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[11]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[12]  S. Banerjee.  Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly , 2008 .

[13]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  Recapturing the corporate environmental management research agenda , 2009 .

[14]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[15]  Marco Giugni,et al.  Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective , 2004 .

[16]  Ulf Henning Richter,et al.  The lack of a critical perspective in environmental management research: distortion in the scientific discourse , 2009 .

[17]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[18]  Maria. Papadakis,et al.  Environmental management and strategy in the face of regulatory intensity: radioactive contamination in the US steel industry , 2008 .

[19]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory , 1994 .

[20]  Paul R. Wyrwoll,et al.  World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD) , 2012 .

[21]  V. Shiva,et al.  The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics. , 1994 .

[22]  K. Wolf.  Emerging Patterns of Global Governance: The New Interplay between the State, Business and Civil Society , 2008 .

[23]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Sustainability, Accountability and Corporate Governance: Exploring Multinationals' Reporting Practices , 2008 .

[24]  Thomas Donaldson,et al.  Response: Making Stakeholder Theory Whole , 1999 .

[25]  E. Iyer,et al.  Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type , 2003 .

[26]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[27]  M. Redclift.  Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. , 1987 .

[28]  R. Phillips.  Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness , 1997, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[29]  Norman E. Bowie,et al.  Book Review , 2001, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[30]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[31]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[32]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature , 2003 .

[33]  J. Bandy.  Managing the Other of Nature: Sustainability, Spectacle, and Global Regimes of Capital in Ecotourism , 1996 .

[34]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Policy modes, firms and the natural environment , 2004 .

[35]  K. Kearins,et al.  The political bottom line: the emerging dimension to corporate responsibility for sustainable development , 2005 .

[36]  Robert E. Gunther,et al.  La sabiduría de los errores deliberados , 2006 .

[37]  Robert P. Anex,et al.  The road to cooperative supply‐chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro‐active firms , 2009 .

[38]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[39]  René J. Jorna,et al.  THE SUSTAINABILITY OF "SUSTAINABILITY" — A STUDY INTO THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE NOTION OF "SUSTAINABILITY" , 2005 .

[40]  T. Donaldson.  Making Stakeholder Theory Whole , 1999 .

[41]  R. Solomon,et al.  Above The Bottom Line: An Introduction to Business Ethics , 1994 .

[42]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry , 2005 .

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[44]  S. Banerjee.  Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations , 2001 .