Multicriteria decision-making in flight route selection

This paper aims to present a hybrid logical-arithmetic approach for selecting optimal flight routes. It can be used in the framework of free route airspace (FRA), which is aimed at achieving higher efficiency of air traffic management.,At the first stage, an initial subset of flight routes is selected that are promising alternatives with respect to single numerical criteria. At the second stage, a hybrid multicriteria decision model is constructed, consisting of numerical criteria and additional linguistic criteria. At the third stage, the numerical and linguistic criteria are integrated into a crisp decision matrix for determining the final ranking using the technique for order preferences by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method.,The considered decision-making problem involves different kinds of criteria. Numerical (objective) criteria are given as real numbers. Linguistic (subjective) criteria are expressed with the help of fuzzy linguistic values. In consequence, a (logical) reasoning process prior to performing an (arithmetic) optimization procedure is necessary. Furthermore, a uniform optimization procedure requires a way of combining numerical and linguistic attributes.,The proposed approach can be applied to solving various multicriteria decision-making problems, where both objective and subjective criteria are taken into account.,First, a fuzzy information system that includes linguistic condition attributes is constructed. Second, a fuzzy inference system that is necessary for determining the resulting fuzzy criterion “turbulence conditions” for all flight routes is introduced. Finally, a way of combining numerical and linguistic criteria is proposed. This is done by converting values of fuzzy attributes into crisp ones, basing on the preferences of a decision-maker.

[1]  Martin Kodera,et al.  Flight planning and flexible use of airspace in Free route airspace area , 2014 .

[2]  J. Hattel,et al.  Multiphysics modelling of manufacturing processes: A review , 2018 .

[3]  Pablo Royo,et al.  Assessment of the North European free route airspace deployment , 2018 .

[4]  Sanja Steiner,et al.  South East Common Sky Initiative Free Route Airspace - implementation aftermath , 2020 .

[5]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  A new approach for multiple objective decision making , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Alicja Mieszkowicz-Rolka,et al.  The Concept of Fuzzy Linguistic Labels for Studying Decision Systems in Air Transportation , 2019, ANT/EDI40.

[8]  Taewan Kim,et al.  A new car-following model considering acceleration of lead vehicle , 2014 .

[9]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[10]  B. B. Zaidan,et al.  Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017 , 2019, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Juraj Vagner,et al.  The Implementation of Free Route Airspace (FRA) in Slovakia , 2018, MAD - Magazine of Aviation Development.

[12]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  The fuzzy TOPSIS applications in the last decade , 2019, KES.

[13]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty with application to air traffic safety , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Sorin Nadaban,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View , 2016 .