Low dimensional adaptive texture feature vectors from class distance and class difference matrices

In many popular texture analysis methods, second or higher order statistics on the relation between pixel gray level values are stored in matrices. A high dimensional vector of predefined, nonadaptive features is then extracted from these matrices. Identifying a few consistently valuable features is important, as it improves classification reliability and enhances our understanding of the phenomena that we are modeling. Whatever sophisticated selection algorithm we use, there is a risk of selecting purely coincidental "good" feature sets, especially if we have a large number of features to choose from and the available data set is limited. In a unified approach to statistical texture feature extraction, we have used class distance and class difference matrices to obtain low dimensional adaptive feature vectors for texture classification. We have applied this approach to four relevant texture analysis methods. The new adaptive features outperformed the classical features when applied to the most difficult set of 45 Brodatz texture pairs. Class distance and difference matrices also clearly illustrated the difference in texture between cell nucleus images from two different prognostic classes of early ovarian cancer. For each of the texture analysis methods, one adaptive feature contained most of the discriminatory power of the method.

[1]  F. Albregtsen,et al.  Fractal Signature Vectors and Lacunarity Class Distance Matrices to Extract New Adaptive Texture Features from Cell Nuclei , 2002 .

[2]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for feature selection: An evaluation , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  Adaptive gray level run length features from class distance matrices , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[5]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  A Review of Caveats in Statistical Nuclear Image Analysis , 1998, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[6]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  The Use of Fractal Features from the Periphery of Cell Nuclei as a Classification Tool , 1999, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Texture Analysis , 2018, Handbook of Image Processing and Computer Vision.

[8]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  New texture features based on the complexity curve , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  Prognostic Classification of Early Ovarian Cancer Based on very Low Dimensionality Adaptive Texture Feature Vectors from Cell Nuclei from Monolayers and Histological Sections , 2001, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[10]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  I. D. Longstaff,et al.  Recent developments in the use of the co-occurrence matrix for texture recognition , 1997, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[12]  H. Tanke,et al.  A reliable Feulgen-acriflavine-SO2 staining procedure for quantitative DNA measurements. , 1980, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[13]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[14]  D. Hedley Chapter 16 DNA Analysis from Paraffin-Embedded Blocks , 1994 .

[15]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  Effects of Many Feature Candidates in Feature Selection and Classification , 2002, SSPR/SPR.

[16]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[17]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Michael Unser,et al.  Sum and Difference Histograms for Texture Classification , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  J D Knoke,et al.  Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis with selection of variables. , 1989, Biometrics.

[21]  David J. Hand,et al.  Discrimination and Classification , 1982 .

[22]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Feature Selection: Evaluation, Application, and Small Sample Performance , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Use of gray value distribution of run lengths for texture analysis , 1990, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[24]  Helene Schulerud Bias of error rates in linear discriminant analysis caused by feature selection and sample size , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[25]  Phil Brodatz,et al.  Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers , 1966 .

[26]  Andrea Berghold,et al.  Primary Unit for Statistical Analysis in Morphometry: Patient or Cell? , 1999, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[27]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..