Quantitative analysis of osteoblast-like cells (MG63) morphology on nanogrooved substrata with various groove and ridge dimensions.

Nanotextured silicon substrata with parallel ridges separated by grooves with equal width from 90 to 500 nm, were fabricated by electron beam lithography and dry etching techniques. Osteoblast-like cells, MG-63, were cultured on the sterilized nanopatterned substrata for 4 or 24 h, and then imaged by scanning electron microscopy. The influence of substrate topography on cell morphology was analyzed by image software. We found the initially cells spread faster on the nanopatterned surfaces than on the flat surface, suggesting that surface anisotropic feature facilitates initial cell extension along its direction. However, because of inhibition of cell lateral expansion across nanogrooved surfaces, the cells on the nanogrooved surface did not further expand laterally, and cell spreading area was less than that on the flat surface after 24 h of incubation. Cells elongated and aligned along the direction of grooves on all the nanopatterned substrata. Furthermore, fluorescence staining of cell nuclei indicated that the nuclei of the cells cultured on the nanopatterned surfaces also displayed a more elongated and aligned morphology along the direction of the grooves. Since cell shape and orientation influence cell functions and alignment of extracellular matrix secreted by cells, our results may provide the information regarding responses of osteoblasts to the nanostructure of collagen fibrils, and benefit bone tissue engineering and surface design of orthopedic implants.

[1]  A F von Recum,et al.  Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[2]  P. Weiss,et al.  CHAPTER 21 – NERVE PATTERNS: THE MECHANICS OF NERVE GROWTH1 , 1968 .

[3]  C. Murphy,et al.  Effects of Substratum Topography on Cell Behavior , 2002 .

[4]  D. Brunette Spreading and orientation of epithelial cells on grooved substrata. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[5]  S. Britland,et al.  Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[6]  H. S. Nalwa Handbook of Nanostructured Biomaterials and Their Applications in Nanobiotechnology , 2006 .

[7]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Reactions of cells to topography. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[8]  Kevin E. Healy,et al.  Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[10]  A F von Recum,et al.  Fibroblast response to microtextured silicone surfaces: texture orientation into or out of the surface. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  C. Murphy,et al.  Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[12]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[13]  D B Burr,et al.  Elastic anisotropy and collagen orientation of osteonal bone are dependent on the mechanical strain distribution , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  R G Harrison,et al.  ON THE STEREOTROPISM OF EMBRYONIC CELLS. , 1911, Science.

[15]  M. Wieland,et al.  Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  Mathis O. Riehle,et al.  The use of materials patterned on a nano- and micro-metric scale in cellular engineering , 2002 .

[17]  J. Jansen,et al.  Early spreading events of fibroblasts on microgrooved substrates. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  G. Dunn,et al.  Alignment of fibroblasts on grooved surfaces described by a simple geometric transformation. , 1986, Journal of cell science.

[19]  C. Murphy,et al.  Cell behavior on lithographically defined nanostructured substrates , 2003 .

[20]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[21]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[22]  W. Herzog,et al.  Elastic anisotropy of articular cartilage is associated with the microstructures of collagen fibers and chondrocytes. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  S. Weiner,et al.  Lamellar bone: structure-function relations. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[24]  A. Curtis,et al.  CONTROL OF CELL BEHAVIOR: TOPOLOGICAL FACTORS. , 1964, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Role of the cytoskeleton in the reaction of fibroblasts to multiple grooved substrata. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[26]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[27]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by micropatterned adhesiveness in vitro. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[28]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[29]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[30]  Savio L-Y Woo,et al.  Cell orientation determines the alignment of cell-produced collagenous matrix. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  C. Oakley,et al.  The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[32]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[33]  A. Curtis,et al.  The control of cell division by tension or diffusion , 1978, Nature.

[34]  J. Jansen,et al.  Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[35]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[36]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[37]  J M Huyghe,et al.  Remodelling of continuously distributed collagen fibres in soft connective tissues. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  W. Kern Cleaning solutions based on hydrogen peroxide for use in silicon semiconductor technology , 1970 .

[39]  Jun Hu,et al.  Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[40]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[41]  Shu-tung Li Biologic Biomaterials: Tissue-Derived Biomaterials (Collagen) , 2007 .

[42]  D. Brunette Fibroblasts on micromachined substrata orient hierarchically to grooves of different dimensions. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[43]  H. Kawakami,et al.  Biomedical properties of nanofabricated fluorinated polyimide surface. , 2002, Artificial organs.

[44]  A Curtis,et al.  Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.